UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

SCHEDULE 14A

 

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of

the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No.    )

 

Filed by the Registrant ☒

 

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant ☐

 

Check the appropriate box:

Preliminary Proxy Statement

Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))

Definitive Proxy Statement

Definitive Additional Materials

Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12

Stock Yards Bancorp, Inc.


(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)


(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box)

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

No fee required.

Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.

(1)

Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

(2)

Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

(3)

Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

(4)

Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

(5)

Total fee paid:

Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

Check box if any part of the fee is offset as providedFee computed on table in exhibit required by Item 25(b) per Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2)Rules 14a6(i)(1) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.0-11

(1)

Amount Previously Paid:

(2)

Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

(3)

Filing Party:

(4)

Date Filed:

 

 

 

image01.jpg

a01.jpg

 

NOTICE OF THE

20222023 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

 

March 16, 202217, 2023

 

To our Shareholders:

 

The Annual Meeting of Shareholders of Stock Yards Bancorp, Inc., a Kentucky corporation, will be held on Thursday, April 28, 2022,27, 2023, at 10:00 a.m., Eastern Time, solely by remote communication in a virtual-only format. The meeting will be accessible on the Internet at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/SYBT2022SYBT2023. The items of business to be presented at the Annual Meeting include the following proposals:

 

 

(1)

To elect directors to serve until the next annual meeting of shareholders and until their respective successors are duly elected and qualified;

 

 

(2)

To ratify the selection of BKD,FORVIS, LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm for Stock Yards Bancorp, Inc. for the year ending December 31, 2022;2023;

 

 

(3)

To approve a non-binding resolution to approve the compensation of Stock Yards Bancorp’s named executive officers; and

 

 

(4)

To hold an advisory vote on the frequency of future shareholder votes on executive compensation; and

(5)

To transact such other business as may properly come before the meeting.

 

The record date for the determination of the shareholders entitled to vote at the meeting or at any adjournment thereof is the close of business on March 4, 2022.3, 2023.

 

A list of shareholders of record as of the record date and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting will be made available for inspection by shareholders for any legally valid purpose related to the Annual Meeting (i) at the principal executive offices of Stock Yards Bancorp, beginning five business days prior to the meeting date and (ii) on the virtual shareholder meeting web site on the date of the meeting.

 

Your vote is important.important. Whether or not you plan to virtually attend the Annual Meeting of Shareholders, we hope you will vote as soon as possible. You may vote your shares electronically using your computer, telephone or mobile device, or by completing, signing, dating and returning the enclosed proxy card in the mailing envelope provided. Instructions regarding each of these methods of voting are contained in the accompanying Proxy Statement. I encourage you to take advantage of one of the electronic voting options. Each offers a quick and convenient way to cast votes and assures that your shares are represented at the meeting.

 

Thank you for your support of Stock Yards Bancorp. If your schedule permits, I hope you will join us via the live webcast.

 

 

By Order of the Board of Directors

/s/ James A. Hillebrand

 James A. Hillebrand
Chairman and Chief Executive Officera02.jpg

image02.jpg

 

1

a00.jpg
image21.jpg

 

PROXY STATEMENT

FOR THE 20222023 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

 

This Proxy Statement is being furnished to the shareholders of Stock Yards Bancorp, Inc. in connection with the solicitation by its Board of Directors of proxies to be used at the 2022 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. This Proxy Statement includes information regarding the matters to be acted upon at the 2022 Annual Meeting and certain other information required by the Securities and Exchange Commission, or “SEC”, and the rules of the Nasdaq Stock Market, or “Nasdaq”. This Proxy Statement is first being mailed to shareholders on or about March 16, 2022.

PROXY HIGHLIGHTS

 

This summary highlights information contained elsewhere in this Proxy Statement about the Annual Meeting and is not complete. We encourage you to read the entire Proxy Statement before voting your shares at the meeting. For complete information about our performance and financial results for 2021,2022, please review our Annual Report on Form 10-K which accompanies this Proxy Statement.

 

Annual Meeting Information

 

Date and Time:

Virtual Location:

Record Date:

Thursday, April 28, 202227, 2023

10:00 a.m., Eastern Time

www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/SYBT2022SYBT2023

March 4, 20223, 2023

 

Voting Matters and Board Recommendations

 

 

Proposal

Board

Recommendation

Page

Reference

1:

Election of directors

✔ FOR all nominees

1214

2:

Ratification of our independent auditor for 20222023

✔ FOR 

2025

3:

Advisory vote on executive compensation (“say-on-pay” vote)

✔ FOR 

2026

4:

Advisory vote on the frequency of future say-on-pay votes

✔ 1 YEAR

26

 

How to Vote Your Shares

 

You may vote your shares using one of the following methods:

 

a03.jpg

image03.jpg

a04.jpg

image04.jpg

a05.jpg

image05.jpg

a06.jpg

image06.jpg

a07.jpg

image07.jpg

www.proxyvote.com

Call toll-free
1-800-690-6903

Scan the QR Code on your proxy card

(above QR code is not active)

Complete, sign, date and return the enclosed proxy card

Attend and vote online at:

www.virtualshareholdermeeting/SYBT2022www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/SYBT2023

 

YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT!

Please cast your vote promptly

PLEASE CAST YOUR VOTE PROMPTLY

 

Attending the Virtual Annual Meeting

 

Our 20222023 Annual Meeting will be held in a virtual-only format via a live webcast. You will be able to attend the meeting online, vote your shares electronically and submit questions either before or during the meeting by following the information and instructions provided in this Proxy Statement. To attend the Annual Meeting online, simply visit the virtual meeting website at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/SYBT2022SYBT2023. In order to be admitted to the meeting, you will need to enter the 16-digit control number located on your proxy card, voting instruction form or email notice included with your proxy materials. For more information about joining the online meeting, go to page 6.

 

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Shareholders Meeting to Be Held on April 28, 2022:27, 2023: The Notice and Proxy Statement and Annual Report are available at www.proxyvote.com and on the investor relations page of the Companys website at https://stockyardsbancorp.q4ir.com.

 

2

 

Table of Contents

GENERAL INFORMATION ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING1 Summary Compensation Table51
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE7 Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table52
Corporate Governance Highlights7 Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year End Table 53
Role of the Board of Directors7 SAR Exercises and Stock (RSAs and PSUs) Vesting55
Corporate Governance Guidelines8 Noncontributory Nonqualified Pension Plan56
Board Leadership Structure  8 Contributory Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan 56
Lead Independent Director8 Potential Change in Control Payments57
Committees of the Board 9 CEO Pay Ratio58
Non-management Executive Sessions11 Pay Versus Performance Disclosure59
Board Evaluation Process 11 REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE65
Codes of Conduct and Ethics12 INDEPENDENT AUDITOR FEES 66
Board Oversight of Risk Management12 TRANSACTIONS WITH MANAGEMENT AND OTHERS  66
Board Meetings and Attendance 12 ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K67
Shareholder Communications with the Board of Directors12 OTHER MATTERS68
CORPORATE RESPONSIBILITY13 APPENDIX A: Reconciliation of GAAP and non-GAAP Financial MeasuresA-1
PROPOSAL 1: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS14   
Board Size and Term of Office14   
Nominees for Election14   
Board Composition17   
Board Diversity Factors17   
Director Skills Matrix18   
Additional Information Regarding the Background and Qualifications of Director Nominees 19   
Commonwealth Bancshares Investor Agreement 21   
Director Nomination Process22   
Shareholder Nominations 22   
Director Independence22   
Director Election Standard 23   
Director Stock Ownership23   
Director Retirement Policy23   
Director Compensation23   
PROPOSAL 2: RATIFICATION OF THE SELECTION OF THE INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM 25   
PROPOSAL 3: ADVISORY VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION26   
PROPOSAL 4: ADVISORY VOTE ON THE FREQUENCY OF FUTURE SAY-ON-PAY VOTES26   
STOCK OWNERSHIP INFORMATION 28   
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION AND OTHER INFORMATION31   
Compensation Discussion and Analysis31   
Report of the Compensation Committee50   
Executive Compensation Tables and Narrative Disclosure51   


GENERAL INFORMATION ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING

About This Proxy Statement

This Proxy Statement is being furnished to the shareholders of Stock Yards Bancorp, Inc. in connection with the solicitation by its Board of Directors of proxies to be used at the 2023 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. This Proxy Statement includes information regarding the matters to be acted upon at the 2023 Annual Meeting and certain other information required by the Securities and Exchange Commission, or “SEC”, and the rules of the Nasdaq Stock Market, or “Nasdaq”. This Proxy Statement is first being mailed to shareholders on or about March 17, 2023.

 

Throughout this Proxy Statement, unless the context otherwise requires, the terms Stock Yards Bancorp, Bancorp, the Company, we, us or our all refer to Stock Yards Bancorp, Inc. and its direct and indirect wholly-owned subsidiaries, including Stock Yards Bank & Trust Company, which we refer to in this Proxy Statement as the Bank. Because Stock Yards Bancorp has no significant operations of its own, its business and that of Stock Yards Bank & Trust Company are essentially the same.

 

Proxy Materials

 

Why have I received these materials?

 

We are mailing these proxy materials to you in connection with our 20222023 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, which will be held on Thursday, April 28, 2022,27, 2023, at 10:00 a.m., Eastern Time. As a shareholder, you are invited to participate in the meeting via live webcast and vote on the matters described in this Proxy Statement.

 

What is included in the proxy materials?

 

These proxy materials include:

 

 

The Notice of the 20222023 Annual Meeting of Shareholders;

 

This Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting; and

 

Our 20212022 Annual Report, which includes our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021.2022.

 

What is a proxy?

 

We are soliciting your proxy to vote the shares of the Company’s common stock that you own at the Annual Meeting. A proxy is your designation of another person to vote stock you own. That other person is called a proxy. If you designate someone as your proxy in a written document, that document is also called a proxy or a proxy card. When you designate a proxy, you may also direct the proxy how to vote your shares. James A. Hillebrand, the Company’s Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, and Philip S. Poindexter, the Company’s President, have been designated as the proxies to cast the votes of Bancorp’s shareholders at the Annual Meeting. The proxies will vote your shares according to the instructions you provide on the proxy card or by telephone, mobile device or over the Internet.

 

Voting Information

 

What am I voting on?

 

 

Electing 1213 directors to serve until the next Annual Meeting of Shareholders and until their respective successors are duly elected and qualified;qualified (Proposal 1);

 

Ratifying the selection of BKD,FORVIS, LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm for Stock Yards Bancorp, Inc. for the year ending December 31, 2022; and2023 (Proposal 2);

 

Approving a non-binding resolution to approve the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers.officers, which we refer to as the say-on-pay proposal (Proposal 3); and

Determining shareholders’ preferred frequency for conducting future say-on-pay votes, which we refer to as the say-on-frequency proposal (Proposal 4).

 

Where can I find more information about these voting matters?

 

 

Information about the nominees for election as directors is contained in Proposal 1 beginning on page 12;14;

 

Information about the ratification of the selection of BKD,FORVIS, LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm is contained in Proposal 2 on page 20; and25;

3

 

Information about the non-binding resolution to approve the compensation of Stock Yards Bancorp’s named executive officerssay-on-pay proposal is contained in Proposal 3 beginning on page 20.26; and

Information about the say-on-frequency proposal is contained in Proposal 4 on page 26.

1

 

Who is entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting?

 

Holders of record of Common Stock (“Common Stock”) of Stock Yards Bancorp as of the close of business on March 4, 20223, 2023 will be entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. On March 4, 2022,3, 2023, there were 26,622,69929,287,064 shares of Common Stock outstanding and entitled to one vote on all matters presented for vote at the Annual Meeting.

 

How do I vote my shares without participating in the Annual Meeting?

 

If you are a “record” shareholder of Common Stock (that is, if you hold Common Stock in your own name in Stock Yards Bancorp’s stock records maintained by our transfer agent), you may vote your shares without participating in the Annual Meeting by using one of the following four options:

 

image22.jpg

By Internet - Go to www.proxyvote.com

Use the Internet to transmit your voting instructions. Vote by 11:59 p.m., Eastern Time, on April 26, 2023 for shares held directly and by 11:59 p.m., Eastern Time, on April 24, 2023 for shares held in a Plan. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the web site and follow the respective instructions to create an electronic voting instruction form.

Use the Internet to transmit your voting instructions. Vote by 11:59 p.m., Eastern Time, on April 27, 2022 for shares held directly and by 11:59 p.m., Eastern Time, on April 25, 2022 for shares held in a Plan. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the web site and follow the respective instructions to create an electronic voting instruction form.

iamge24.jpg

By Telephone – Call 1-800-690-6903

Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions. Vote by 11:59 p.m., Eastern Time, on April 26, 2023 for shares held directly and by 11:59 p.m., Eastern Time, on April 24, 2023 for shares held in a Plan. Have your proxy card in hand when you call and then follow the respective instructions.

Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions. Vote by 11:59 p.m., Eastern Time, on April 27, 2022 for shares held directly and by 11:59 p.m., Eastern Time, on April 25, 2022 for shares held in a Plan. Have your proxy card in hand when you call and then follow the respective instructions.

image25.jpg

By Mobile DeviceQR Code

Scan the QR Code that appears on your proxy card or voting instruction card to vote using your mobile device (cell phone or tablet).

Scan the QR Code that appears on your proxy card or voting instruction card to vote using your mobile device (cell phone or tablet).

iamge26.jpg

By Mail

Mark, sign and date your proxy card and either return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717.

 

Can I vote my shares during the meeting?

 

You may vote online during the meeting by logging into the virtual meeting web site with the 16-digit control number located on your proxy card, voting instruction form or email notice included with your proxy materials and following the on-screen instructions. You may also continue to vote your shares by mail, telephone, mobile device or internet prior to the virtual meeting by following the voting instructions included in your proxy materials. If you have already voted using one of these methods you do not need to vote again at the meeting unless you wish to change your vote or revoke a previous proxy.

 

If my shares are held by my broker, will my broker vote my shares for me?

 

If your shares are held in a stock brokerage account or by a bank or other holder of record (that is, in “street name”), you are considered the beneficial owner of those shares. This Notice of Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement and any accompanying documents have been forwarded to you by your broker, bank or other holder of record. As the beneficial owner, you have the right to direct your broker, bank or other holder of record how to vote your shares by using the voting instruction card provided by them or by following their instructions for voting by telephone, mobile device or over the Internet. Beneficial owners who wish to vote their shares electronically during the Annual Meeting may do so by following the instructions from their broker that accompany their proxy materials.

 

4

Who votes the shares held in my Stock Yards KSOP account?

 

If you are a participant in the Stock Yards Bank & Trust Company 401(k) and Employee Stock Ownership Plan (“KSOP”), you have the option of receiving your voting information either electronically or by regular postal mail. Plan participants who have elected to receive their voting information electronically should follow the instructions contained in the electronic communication. If you have not affirmatively elected to receive voting information for your KSOP shares electronically, you will receive a paper version of the proxy card via postal mail that will include the shares you own through your KSOP account. That proxy card will serve as a voting instruction card for the trustee of the plan. If you own shares through the plan and do not vote electronically or by mail, the plan trustee will be instructed by the plan’s administrative committee to vote the plan shares as the Board of Directors recommends.

 

2

What if I return my proxy card but do not provide voting instructions?

 

If you vote by proxy card, your shares will be voted as you instruct. If you return your proxy card but do not mark your voting instructions on your signed card, James A. Hillebrand, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, and Philip S. Poindexter, President, as proxies named on the proxy card, will vote your shares FOR the election of the 1213 director nominees, FOR the ratification of BKD,FORVIS, LLP, and FOR the approval of the compensation ofsay-on-pay proposal and 1 YEAR on the named executive officers.say-on-frequency proposal.

 

Can I change my vote after I have voted?

 

Yes. You may change your vote at any time before the polls close at the Annual Meeting. You may do this by:

 

 

Signing another proxy card with a later date and returning it to us prior to the Annual Meeting;

 

Voting again by telephone, mobile device or through the Internet prior to 11:59 p.m., Eastern Time, on April 27, 2022;26, 2023;

 

Giving written notice of revocation to our Corporate Secretary at 1040 East Main Street, Louisville, Kentucky 40206, prior to the Annual Meeting; or

 

Voting again electronically during the Annual Meeting.

 

Your participation in the Annual Meeting will not have the effect of revoking a proxy unless you notify our Corporate Secretary in writing before the polls close that you wish to revoke a previously submitted proxy.

 

What is a broker non-vote?

 

If you are a beneficial owner whose shares are held of record by a broker, you must instruct the broker how to vote your shares. If you do not provide voting instructions, your shares will not be voted on any proposal on which the broker does not have the discretionary authority to vote. This is called a “broker non-vote.” In these cases the broker can register your shares as being present at the Annual Meeting for purposes of determining the presence of a quorum but will not be able to vote on those matters for which specific authorization is required under the rules of the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) that govern brokers.

 

If you are a beneficial owner whose shares are held of record by a broker, your broker has discretionary voting authority to vote your shares on the ratification of BKD,FORVIS, LLP (Proposal 2) even if the broker does not receive voting instructions from you. However, your broker does not have discretionary authority to vote on the election of directors (Proposal 1), the say-on-pay proposal (Proposal 3) or the approval of executive compensationsay-on-frequency proposal (Proposal 3)4) without instructions from you, in which case a broker non-vote will occur and your shares will not be voted on these matters.

5

 

What constitutes a quorum for purposes of the Annual Meeting?

 

Holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of Common Stock entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting must be present at the Annual Meeting or represented by proxy for the transaction of business. This is called a quorum. Proxies marked as abstaining (including proxies containing broker non-votes) on any matter to be acted upon by shareholders will be treated as present at the meeting for purposes of determining a quorum but will not be counted as votes cast on such matters. If a quorum is not present, we may propose to adjourn the meeting to solicit additional proxies and reconvene the meeting at a later date.

 

3

What vote is required to approve each Proposal?

 

You may vote “FOR” each nominee for director or “AGAINST” each nominee, or “ABSTAIN” from voting on one or more nominees. Unless you mark “AGAINST” or “ABSTAIN” with respect to a particular nominee or nominees or for all nominees, your proxy will be voted “FOR” each ofThe following chart describes the director nominees named in this Proxy Statement. A nominee will be elected as a director if the number of “FOR” votes exceeds the number of “AGAINST” votes.

The selection of the independent registered public accounting firm will be ratified if the votes cast for it exceed the votes cast against it.

The proposal to approve the compensation of our named executive officers disclosed in this Proxy Statement will pass if votes cast for it exceed votes cast against it. Because this vote is advisory, it will not be binding upon Bancorp or the Board of Directors.

Any other proposalproposals to be voted uponconsidered at the Annual Meeting, the vote required to elect directors and to approve each of the other proposals and the manner in which votes will pass if votes cast for it exceed votes cast against it.be counted.

Proposals

Voting Options

Votes

Required

Effect of

Abstentions

Effect of

Broker

Non-Votes

Proposal 1: Election of Directors

For, against or abstain

for each nominee

Majority of

votes cast

No effect

No effect

Proposal 2: Ratification of our independent

accountants for 2023

For, against or

abstain

Majority of

votes cast

No effect

No effect

Proposal 3: Approval of our executive compensation

(say-on-pay)

For, against or

abstain

Majority of

votes cast

No effect

No effect

Proposal 4: A proposal on the frequency of future

say-on-pay votes

1, 2 or 3 years or

abstain

Majority of

votes cast

No effect

No effect

Proposal 1: Election of directors.  Our Bylaws provide that a nominee for director in an uncontested election will be elected to our Board if the number of votes cast for the nominee’s election exceed the number of votes cast against his or her election. If a nominee does not receive the required votes for election at our Annual Meeting, our Board, with the assistance of our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, will consider whether to accept the director’s offer of resignation, which is required to be tendered under our Corporate Governance Guidelines. Our Board will publicly disclose its decision regarding the resignation and the basis for its decision within 90 days after election results are certified.

Other proposals. Approval of Proposals 2 and 3 requires that the votes cast in favor of each such proposal exceed the votes cast against the proposal. Because the say-on-pay vote (Proposal 3) is advisory, it will not be binding on the Company or our Board of Directors. For Proposal 4, there are four choices for shareholders: each year; every two years; every three years; and abstain. The choice that receives the majority of votes cast will be considered shareholders’ preferred frequency for future say-on-pay votes. If none of the choices receives a majority of the votes cast on the proposal, we will consider the choice receiving the highest number of votes as the preferred frequency.

 

What happens if the Annual Meeting is adjourned or postponed?

 

Your proxy will still be effective and will be voted at the rescheduled meeting in the same manner as it would have been voted at the originally scheduled meeting. You will still be able to change or revoke your proxy until it is voted.

 

Who counts the votes?

 

Broadridge Financial Solutions will count votes cast by proxy at the Annual Meeting. They will also certify the results of the voting and will also determine whether a quorum is present at the meeting. Any votes cast electronically during the Annual Meeting will be included in the final voting tally.

 

How are abstentions and broker non-votes treated?

 

You may abstain from voting on one or more nominees for director. You may also abstain from voting on any or all other proposals. Abstentions will be treated as shares that are present and entitled to vote for purposes of determining the presence of a quorum, but will not be counted in the number of votes cast for or against any nominee or with respect to any other matter. If a broker does not receive voting instructions from the beneficial owner of shares on a particular matter and indicates on the proxy that it does not have discretionary authority to vote on that matter, we will treat these shares as present at the meeting for purposes of determining a quorum but the shares will not count as votes cast on the matter. Abstentions and broker non-votes will not affect the outcome of any matters to be voted on at the Annual Meeting.

 

4

How does the Board recommend that I vote my shares?

 

The Board recommends a vote FOR each of the nominees for director set forth in this Proxy Statement, FOR the ratification of the selection of the independent registered accounting firm, and FOR the approval of the compensation ofsay-on-pay proposal and 1 YEAR on the named executive officers.say-on-frequency proposal.

 

With respect to any other matter that properly comes before the Annual Meeting, the proxy holders will vote as recommended by the Board of Directors or, if no recommendation is given, in their own discretion in the best interests of Stock Yards Bancorp. At the date this Proxy Statement went to press, the Board of Directors had no knowledge of any business other than that described herein that would be presented for consideration at the Annual Meeting.

 

6

Is my vote confidential?

Proxy instructions, ballots and voting tabulations that identify individual shareholders are kept confidential from our management and Board of Directors to protect your voting privacy. We will not disclose the proxy voting instructions or ballots of individual shareholders unless disclosure is required by law and in certain other limited circumstances. If you write comments on your proxy card, the card may be forwarded to our management and Board of Directors to review your comments.

 

Who will bear the expense of soliciting proxies?

 

Stock Yards Bancorp will bear the cost of soliciting proxies in the form enclosed. In addition to the solicitation by mail, proxies may be solicited personally or by telephone, facsimile or electronic transmission by our employees. We reimburse brokers holding Common Stock in their names or in the names of their nominees for their expenses in sending proxy materials to the beneficial owners of such Common Stock. The Company has engaged the services of Laurel Hill Advisory Group, LLC, a professional proxy solicitation firm, to aid in the solicitation of proxies from certain brokers, bank nominees and other institutional owners. The Company’s cost for such services will be $8,000$8,500 plus reasonable out of pocket expenses.

 

How can I find the voting results of the Annual Meeting?

 

Preliminary results will be announced at the Annual Meeting. Final results will be published in a Current Report on Form 8-K that we will file with the SEC within four business days after the Annual Meeting.

 

Virtual Meeting Information

Why are you holding a virtual meeting instead of a physical meeting?

The Annual Meeting will be conducted in an online, virtual-only format. This format enables us to leverage technology to communicate more efficiently with our shareholders. We can provide a consistent experience for all our shareholders regardless of geographic location and allow all shareholders with internet access to attend and participate in the meeting without the cost of travel. We have designed the virtual meeting format to provide the same participation opportunities as were provided at our past in-person meetings, including the ability to vote your shares and ask questions during the meeting.

 

How do I participate in the meeting?

 

To participate in the virtual meeting, visit www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/SYBT2022SYBT2023 and enter the 16-digit control number located on your proxy card, voting instruction form or email notice that accompanied your proxy materials. You may log into the meeting platform beginning at 9:45 a.m., Eastern Time, on April 28, 2022.27, 2023. The live audio webcast will begin promptly at 10:00 a.m., Eastern Time. We encourage shareholders to access the virtual meeting web site prior to the start of the meeting and to allow sufficient time to complete the online registration process.

 

What are the technical requirements for accessing the online meeting site?

 

The virtual meeting platform is fully supported across browsers (Microsoft Edge, Firefox, Chrome and Safari) and devices (desktops, laptops, tablets and cell phones) running the most updated version of applicable software and plugins. Participants should ensure that they have a strong Internet connection wherever they intend to participate in the meeting. Participants should also give themselves ample time to log in and ensure that they can hear streaming audio prior to the start of the meeting.

 

5

Will I have an opportunity to submit a question?

 

Yes, shareholders will have the opportunity to submit questions if they choose. If you wish to submit a question, you may do so in two ways. If you want to ask a question before the meeting, you may log into www.proxyvote.com and enter your 16-digit control number. Next, click on “Question for Management,” type in your question and click “Submit.” Alternatively, if you want to submit your question during the meeting, log into the virtual meeting platform at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/SYBT2022SYBT2023, type your question into the box titled “Ask a Question” on the meeting screen and click “Submit.” Shareholders may choose from a list of optional question topics or enter their own live question in the box provided. Questions and answers will be grouped by topic and substantially similar questions will be grouped and answered together.

 

Questions pertinent to meeting matters will be answered during the meeting, subject to time constraints. Shareholders should refer to the Rules of Conduct and Procedures for the meeting that will be posted on the virtual meeting web site for guidelines regarding the submission of questions, including certain topics and subject matter that we will consider inappropriate for purposes of the meeting. Any questions pertinent to meeting matters that cannot be answered during the meeting due to time constraints will be posted online and answered at www.syb.com. The questions and answers will be available as soon as practical after the meeting and will remain available until one week after posting.

 

7

What if I have lost or misplaced my 16-digit control number?

 

If you no longer have your control number or were not a shareholder on March 4, 2022,3, 2023, you may still enter the meeting as a guest in listen-only mode. To access the meeting as a guest, visit www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/SYBT2022SYBT2023 and enter the requested information on the welcome screen. However, if you attend the meeting as a guest, you will not have the ability to vote or submit questions.

 

What if I experience technical difficulties accessing the meeting?

 

If you encounter any technical difficulties with the virtual meeting platform, please use the telephone numbers listed on the meeting web site prior to the start of the meeting and technicians will be available to assist you.

 

What will happen if we experience technical problems during the meeting webcast?

 

In the event of technical difficulties or interruptions with the Annual Meeting, we expect that an announcement will be made on the meeting website, www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/SYBT2022.SYBT2023. If necessary, the announcement will provide updated information regarding the date, time and location of the Annual Meeting. Any updated information regarding the Annual Meeting will also be posted to the investor relations page on our website, www.syb.com.

 

Shareholder Proposals and Director Nominations

 

Is there any information thatCan I should know about future annual meetings?submit a proposal (other than a director nomination) for consideration at the 2024 Annual Meeting?

 

Any shareholder who intends to present a proposal at the 20232024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders must deliver the proposal to the Corporate Secretary at 1040 East Main Street, Louisville, Kentucky 40206the address provided below no later than November 16, 202217, 2023 if the proposal is submitted for inclusion in our proxy materials for that meeting pursuant to Rule 14a-8 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. In addition, our Bylaws impose certain notice requirements onFor a shareholder nominating a director or submitting a proposal that is submitted for presentation directly at the 2024 Annual Meeting but not intended to an Annual Meeting. Noticebe included in our proxy materials under Rule 14a-8, the shareholder must give timely notice to our Corporate Secretary and otherwise comply with the applicable requirements of our Bylaws. Our Bylaws require that notice of a shareholder proposal or director nomination must be submitted to thereceived by our Corporate Secretary of Stock Yards Bancorp no later than January 28, 202326, 2024 and contain the information prescribed by the Bylaws, copies of which are available from the Corporate Secretary. These requirements apply even if

How may I nominate individuals to serve as directors at the 2024 Annual Meeting?

Our Bylaws permit shareholders to nominate directors for consideration at an annual meeting. A shareholder does not desiredesiring to have his or herpresent a director nomination or proposal includeddirectly at an annual meeting must provide the information required by our Bylaws and give timely notice of the nomination to our Corporate Secretary in accordance with our Proxy Statement. Finally,Bylaws. To nominate a director for consideration at the 2024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, the notice must be received by our Corporate Secretary at the address provided below no later than January 26, 2024, and contain the information required by our Bylaws.

6

Further, the deadline for providing notice to the Company under Rule 14a-19, the SEC’s new universal proxy rule, of a shareholder’s intent to solicit proxies on the Company’s proxy card in support of director nominees submitted in accordance with the advance notice provisions of our Bylaws for the 20232024 Annual Meeting of Shareholders is February 25, 2023.27, 2024. This deadline under Rule 14a-19 does not supersede or replace any of the timing requirements for advance notice under our Bylaws. The supplemental notice and information required under Rule 14a-19 is in addition to the advance notice requirements of our Bylaws and does not extend the deadline specified in the Bylaws.

 

CORPORATE GOVERNANCEAll shareholder proposals, director nominations and requests for copies of our Bylaws should be addressed as follows:

 

Stock Yards Bancorp, Inc.

Executive Offices

1040 E. Main Street

Louisville, Kentucky 40206

Attn: Corporate Secretary

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Corporate Governance Highlights

 

Our Board of Directors and management are committed to strong corporate governance practices, which we believe support our dedication to managing the Company’s business in a responsible and ethical manner and promote long-term shareholder value. Highlights of our governance structure and practices include the following:

 

Board Independence

●    Strong Lead Independent Director

●    Substantial majority of independent directors

●    All Board committees are comprised entirely of independent directors

●    Executive sessions of non-management directors at Board and committee meetings

Board Accountability

●    Annual elections for all directors

●    Majority voting in uncontested director elections combined with a director resignation policy

●    Mandatory director retirement policy

8

 

Board focus on strategic planning and direction, including annual reviews of the Company’s strategic objectives and plansStrong Lead Independent Director

 

No poison pillSubstantial majority of independent directors

All Board committees are comprised entirely of independent directors

Executive sessions of non-management directors at Board and committee meetings

 

Board EffectivenessAccountability

●    Annual Board and committee assessments, including one-on-one discussions between the Lead Independent Director and each other non-management director

●    Strong corporate governance guidelines

●    Comprehensive onboarding program for new

Annual elections for all directors

Majority voting in uncontested director elections combined with a director resignation policy

Mandatory director retirement policy

Board focus on strategic planning and direction, including annual reviews of the Company’s strategic objectives and plans

No poison pill

 

Shareholder AlignmentBoard Effectiveness

    Robust stock ownership requirements for directors and executive management

●    Policies that prohibit our directors and executive officers from hedging or pledging Stock Yards stock

Annual Board and committee assessments, including one-on-one discussions between the Lead Independent Director and each other non-management director

Strong corporate governance guidelines

Comprehensive onboarding program for new directors

Ongoing training and educational opportunities for directors

 

Shareholder Alignment

Robust stock ownership requirements for directors and executive management

Policies that prohibit our directors and executive officers from hedging or pledging Stock Yards stock

Role of the Board of Directors

 

The Stock Yards Bancorp’s Board of Directors represents shareholders’ interests in perpetuating a successful business including optimizing shareholder returns. The Directors are responsible for determining that the Company is managed to ensure this result. This is an active responsibility, and the Board monitors the effectiveness of policies and decisions including the execution of the Company’s business strategies. Strong corporate governance guidelines form the foundation for Board practices. As a part of this foundation, the Board believes that high ethical standards in all Company matters are essential to earning the confidence of investors, customers, employees and vendors. Accordingly, Stock Yards Bancorp has established a framework that exercises appropriate measures of oversight at all levels of the Company and clearly communicates that the Board expects all actions be consistent with its fundamental principles of business ethics and other corporate governance guidelines.

 

7

Corporate Governance Guidelines

 

Our Board of Directors has adopted Corporate Governance Guidelines that provide the framework for how the Board conducts its business and fulfills its duties and responsibilities. The Corporate Governance Guidelines address board responsibilities, director independence, the role of the Lead Independent Director, director qualifications, stock ownership requirements and other Board structures and practices intended to enhance the Board’s effectiveness. Under the leadership and oversight of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, the Corporate Governance Guidelines are reviewed annually in light of recent governance trends and developments, best practices and changes in applicable laws and regulations. The Corporate Governance Guidelines are available on the investor relations page of the Company’s website, www.syb.com.

 

Board Leadership Structure

 

The Board of Directors modified the Company’s leadership structure during 2018 in connection with the retirement of David P. Heintzman as Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Heintzman had previously held the positions of Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer. He retired as Chief Executive Officer effective September 30, 2018, and James A. Hillebrand, previously President of the Company, was appointed to succeed Mr. Heintzman as Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Heintzman remained employed in the role of Executive Chairman until his retirement from the Company at the end of 2018. Thereafter, Mr. Heintzman continued to lead the Board as non-executive Chairman until the end of 2020.

During 2020, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, in consultation with Mr. Heintzman, reviewed the leadership structure of the Board and decided that the interests of the Company’s shareholders would be best served by again combining the roles of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. Based upon the recommendation of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, and noting the successful executive management transition process following Mr. Heintzman’s retirement and strong leadership skills demonstrated by Mr. Hillebrand following his promotion to Chief Executive Officer, the Board of Directors voted to appoint Mr. Hillebrand to the additional position of Chairman of the Board effective January 1, 2021.

9

The Board of Directors believes that the most effective leadership structure for the Company at the present time is to combine the roles of Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer. Our current Chief Executive Officer, James A. Hillebrand, was appointed to the additional position of Chairman of the Board effective January 1, 2021. Mr. Hillebrand has a long history of service in various management capacities with the Bank, is very familiar with its business, its customers and the banking industry generally, and the community bank model in particular. The Board believes that he is highly qualified to lead discussions on important strategic and operational issues affecting the Bank and Bancorp. Combining the Chief Executive Officer and Chairman positions creates a firm link between management and the Board and promotes development and implementation of corporate strategy. The Board also believes that the industry knowledge and experience provided by Mr. Hillebrand as our Chief Executive Officer, together with our strong lead independent director, Stephen M. Priebe, and our experienced committee chairs and other directors, will enable the Company to continue to meet the expectations of our shareholders and provide strong independent oversight from our directors.

 

The Board does not have a fixed policy on whether the roles of Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer should be separate or combined. The Company’s corporate governance documents address the leadership structure of the Board and the respective roles of the Chairman of the Board and the Chief Executive Officer. The Board will annually elect one of its members to serve as Chairman of the Board. The Chairman will preside at all meetings of the shareholders and of the Board of Directors, and generally consult with the Board on matters pertaining to the Company’s business and affairs. Both positions may, but need not, be held by the same person. The decision as to whether the offices of Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer should be combined or separated will be made from time to time by the Board of Directors at its discretion. The Board’s decision will be made in its business judgment and based upon its consideration of all relevant factors and circumstances at the time, including the specific needs of the Company’s business, the strengths of the individual or individuals holding those positions and the current composition of the Board. We would notify shareholders promptly of a decision by the Board to separate the roles of Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer.

 

If the individual elected as Chairman of the Board is also the Chief Executive Officer, or if the Chairman of the Board is not an independent director, the Board will elect a lead independent director to help ensure strong independent leadership on the Board.

 

In addition to an independent lead director, five committees of the Board provide independent oversight of management – the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, the Risk Committee and the Trust Committee. Each is composed entirely of independent directors.

 

Lead Independent Director

 

If a lead independent director is called for under the Company’s governance documents, the Chair of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee acts in that role. Stephen M. Priebe currently serves as lead director because Mr. Hillebrand, as the current Chief Executive Officer of the Company, does not qualify as an independent director under the Board’s independence standards. The role and responsibility of the lead director presides at executive sessionsconsists of the following:

preside at executive sessions of the Board, which consist of independent and non-management directors and are held at least two times annually;

call special meetings of the independent directors and committees of the Board;

8

serve as a liaison between the Chief Executive Officer and board members and be available to discuss with any director concerns he or she may have regarding the Board, the Company or the management team;

provide advice and consultation to the Chief Executive Officer and inform him or her of decisions reached and suggestions made during executive sessions of the Board of Directors;

review and approve matters such as agendas and schedules for Board meetings and executive sessions, and information distributed to board members; and

consult and communicate with shareholders where appropriate.

Committees of the Board

Stock Yards Bancorp maintains an Audit Committee, a Compensation Committee, a Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and a Risk Committee of the Board of Directors. The lead directorBank maintains a Trust Committee of the Board of Directors. Each of these committees operates under a written charter approved by the Board of Directors and reviewed annually by the committee. The chair of each committee reports its activities, discussions, recommendations and approvals to the full Board at each regularly scheduled Board meeting. Committee leadership and membership is reviewed annually by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and, upon its recommendations, approved by the Board. The charters are available on the investor relations page of our website, www.syb.com. Current members of each of these committees are identified below.

Director

Audit

Committee

Compensation

Committee

Nominating

And

Corporate

Governance

Committee

Risk

Committee

Trust

Committee

Shannon B. Arvin

Chair

Paul J. Bickel III

J. McCauley Brown

Allison J. Donovan

David P. Heintzman (1)

Chair

Carl G. Herde (1)

Chair

James A. Hillebrand (3)

Richard A. Lechleiter (1)

Chair

Philip S. Poindexter (3)

Stephen M. Priebe (2)

Chair

Edwin S. Saunier

John L. Schutte

Kathy C. Thompson (3)

Laura L.Wells

(1)

Audit Committee Financial Expert

(2)

Lead Independent Director

(3)

Messrs. Hillebrand and Poindexter and Ms. Thompson are management directors and do not serve on any Board committees.

Audit Committee

The Board of Directors of Stock Yards Bancorp maintains an Audit Committee comprised of directors who are not officers of Stock Yards Bancorp. Each member of the Audit Committee meets the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and NASDAQ independence requirements for membership on an audit committee and each is financially literate within the meaning of the NASDAQ listing rules.

9

The Audit Committee oversees the Company’s financial reporting process on behalf of the Board of Directors. Management has primary responsibility for the financial statements and the reporting process including the systems of internal controls. In fulfilling its oversight responsibilities, the Committee, among other matters,

considers the appointment of our external auditors,

reviews with the auditors the plan and scope of the audit and audit fees,

monitors the adequacy of reporting and internal controls,

meets regularly with internal and external auditors,

reviews the independence of the external auditors,

reviews our financial results as reported in SEC filings,

approves all audit and permitted non-audit services performed by our external auditors,

reviews and evaluates identified related party transactions, and

discusses with management the Company’s major financial risk exposures and the steps management has taken to monitor and control those exposures.

The Audit Committee meets with our management at least quarterly to consider the adequacy of our internal controls and the objectivity of our financial reporting. This Committee also meets with the external auditors and with our internal auditors regarding these matters. Both the independent auditors and the internal auditors regularly meet privately with this Committee and have unrestricted access to this Committee.

The Audit Committee held six meetings during 2022.

The Board of Directors has determined that Messrs. Heintzman, Herde and Lechleiter are audit committee financial experts for Stock Yards Bancorp and are independent as described in the paragraph above. We refer you to the section captioned “REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE” on page 65 of this Proxy Statement for more information about the role and responsibility of the Audit Committee in the Company’s financial reporting process.

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

The Board of Directors of Stock Yards Bancorp maintains a Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. Each member of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee meets the NASDAQ independence requirements for membership on a nominating and governance committee. Responsibilities of the Committee are set forth in a written charter satisfying the NASDAQ’s corporate governance standards, requirements of federal securities law and incorporating other best practices.

The Committee’s primary duties and responsibilities consist of:

identifying and evaluating candidates for election to the Board of Directors, including consideration of candidates suggested by shareholders;

developing a Board succession strategy;

assisting the Board in determining the structure, leadership and composition of Board committees;

monitoring the Board’s effectiveness;

developing and implementing the Company’s corporate governance guidelines;

establishing stock ownership guidelines for non-management directors and annually assessing directors’ ownership relative to those guidelines;

developing and overseeing an annual self-evaluation process for the Board and its committees; and

reviewing the Company’s policies, practices and disclosures with respect to environmental, social and governance, or ESG, matters

This Committee held four meetings during 2022.

Compensation Committee

The Board of Directors of Stock Yards Bancorp maintains a Compensation Committee. Each member of the Compensation Committee meets the NASDAQ independence requirements for membership on the Compensation Committee. The responsibilities of this Committee include oversight of executive and Board compensation and related programs. We refer you to the section captioned “REPORT ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION” beginning on page 31 of this Proxy Statement for more information about the role and responsibilities of the Compensation Committee in our executive compensation program and its activities during 2022.

The Compensation Committee held seven meetings during 2022.

10

Risk Committee

The Board of Directors of Stock Yards Bancorp maintains a Risk Committee. This Committee is responsible for overseeing and monitoring management’s implementation and enforcement of the Bank’s framework for risk management throughout the organization. The Committee’s primary duties and responsibilities consist of:

monitoring and advising the Board of matters specific to the Bank’s risk exposures, including credit, cyber/information security and compliance/legal risks;

reviewing reports of examination by regulatory agencies and reviewing and observations or communications by regulatory agencies, and the results of internal and third party testing, analyses and reviews, related to the Bank’s risks, risk management or any other matters within the scope of the Committee’s oversight responsibilities;

reviewing items as mandated by regulatory agencies, which may include annual reviews of information security, physical security and the BSA/AML program; and

assisting the Board in overseeing and supervising all aspects of the Bank’s compliance with the Community Reinvestment Act (“CRA”) and fair lending.

The Committee reviews and approves matters such as agendasdiscusses with management its assessment of asset quality and schedulestrends in asset quality, credit quality administration and underwriting standards and the effectiveness of portfolio risk management systems. The Committee is also responsible for Board meetingsreviewing and executive sessions,approving significant lending and credit policies and compliance with those policies. Additionally, the Risk Committee has oversight responsibility for a wide range of enterprise-related risks within the Bank, including regulatory compliance, information distributed to board members. The lead director will be available to consultsecurity, cybersecurity, insurance and communicate with shareholders where appropriate.physical security.

 

The Risk Committee held six regular meetings in 2022.

Trust Committee

The Board of Directors of Stock Yards Bank maintains a Trust Committee. The Trust Committee oversees the operations of the wealth management and trust department of the Bank to help ensure it operates in accordance with sound fiduciary principles and is in compliance with pertinent laws and regulations. The Committee’s primary duties and responsibilities consist of:

approving written policies to govern the conduct of the Bank’s fiduciary and trust activities;

monitoring the proper implementation of policies, procedures and guidelines established for the activities and operations of the wealth management and trust department;

reviewing business development reports and overseeing the development and growth of new wealth management and trust business;

reviewing regular reports from management concerning investment performance and significant changes in recommended assets for applicable investment accounts; and

reviewing audit and examination reports.

This Committee held five meetings in 2022.

Non-management Executive Sessions

 

The non-management members of the Board of Directors meet in executive session at least twice each year following the regularly scheduled Board meeting, and more frequently if necessary or appropriate. The Lead Independent Director presides over these executive sessions. The executive sessions provide an opportunity for the directors to discuss topics such as business results and performance, executive leadership and succession, critical strategic matters and other matters outside the presence of management. Board committees also have the opportunity to meet in executive session without management if they choose to do so.

 

1011

 

Board Evaluation Process

 

The Board conducts an annual self-assessment to enhance its effectiveness. Through regular evaluation of its policies, practices and procedures, the Board identifies areas for further consideration and improvement. The evaluation process is led by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. Each year, that Committee discusses and decides upon the process to be followed for the upcoming year. Each director may be requested to complete a questionnaire and provide feedback on a range of issues, including his or her assessment of the Board’s overall effectiveness and performance; its committee structure; priorities for future Board discussion and attention; the composition of the Board and the background and skills of its members; the quality, timing and relevance of information received from management; the nature and scope of agenda items; and his or her individual contributions to the Board. The lead director then meets with each director individually either to discuss his or her questionnaire responses or, if directors were not requested to complete a questionnaire, to discuss thoughts and suggestions the director may have regarding the Board’s overall effectiveness or specific Board practices or policies. The lead director prepares a summary of findings drawn from the questionnaire responses and director interviews for presentation to the full Board of Directors. Each of the Committees also conducts their own self-assessments led by the respective committee chairs.

 

Codes of Conduct and Ethics

 

We require all of our officers and employees and, when applicable, our directors to accept and abide by our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, or the “Code of Conduct”. The Code of Conduct reinforces our Company’s commitment to the highest standards of ethical business practices and compliance with all applicable legal requirements, and sets forth expectations for the use and protection of proprietary business and customer information and relationships with our employees, customers, vendors and the public, among other matters. Our Chief Executive Officer, President, Chief Financial Officer, Controller and other financial officers are also subject to a Code of Ethics which supplements our general Code of Conduct. We will promptly disclose any amendment or waiver with respect to the financial Code of Ethics in accordance with the applicable rules of the SEC and Nasdaq.

 

All of our directors, officers and employees are required to annually affirm in writing their continued understanding of and compliance with our Code of Conduct. Employees receive regular quarterly reminders of our “Do the Right Thing” policy and their responsibility to report questionable business practices that could be violations of law or breaches of our Code of Conduct. Employees are encouraged to report their concerns on a confidential basis either directly to a designated company employee or to a representative of an independent third party firm.

 

Board Oversight of Risk Management

 

The Board of Directors has a significant role in the oversight of risk management. The Board receives information regarding risks facing the Company, their relative magnitude and management’s plan for mitigating these risks. Primary risks facing the Company are credit, operational, cybersecurity and informational security, interest rate, liquidity, compliance/legal, strategic and reputational risks. After assessment by management, reports are made to committees of the Board. Credit risk is addressed by the Risk Committee of Bancorp. Operational and compliance/legal risks are addressed by the Audit Committee and the Risk Committee of Bancorp. Cybersecurity and informational security risks are addressed by the Risk Committee of Bancorp. Interest rate and liquidity risks are addressed by the Asset/Liability Committee comprised of Bank management and reports are made to the Board at each of its regular meetings. Strategic and reputational risk is addressed by the above committees in addition to the Compensation Committee of Bancorp along with other executive compensation matters. Oversight of the trust department is addressed by the Trust Committee of the Bank. Corporate governance matters are addressed by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of Bancorp. The full Board receives reports from each of these committees at the Board meeting immediately following the Committee meeting. The Bank’s Director of Internal Audit has a direct reporting line to the Audit Committee of the Board. The Chief Risk Officer, Information Security Officer and Compliance Officer make regular reports to the Audit and Risk Committees and the full Board when appropriate.

 

Board Meetings and Attendance

During 2022, the Board of Directors of Stock Yards Bancorp held eight regularly scheduled meetings and one special meeting. All directors of Stock Yards Bancorp are also directors of the Bank. During 2022, the Bank’s Board of Directors also held eight regularly scheduled meetings and one special meeting.

All directors attended at least 75% of the number of meetings of the Board and committees of the Board on which they served that were held during the period he or she served as a director. All directors are encouraged to attend annual meetings of shareholders, and all attended the 2022 Annual Meeting.

Shareholder Communications with the Board of Directors

 

Shareholders may communicate directly to the Board of Directors in writing by sending a letter to the Board at: Stock Yards Bancorp Board of Directors, P.O. Box 32890, Louisville, KY 40232-2890. Communications directed to the Board of Directors will be received by the Chairman and processed by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee when the communications concern matters related to the duties and responsibilities of the Board of Directors.

 

1112

 

BOARD OF DIRECTORSCORPORATE RESPONSIBILITY MEETINGS AND COMMITTEES

During 2021, the Board of Directors of Stock Yards Bancorp held eight regularly scheduled meetings and two special meetings. All directors of Stock Yards Bancorp are also directors of the Bank. During 2021, the Bank’s Board of Directors also held eight regularly scheduled meetings and two special meetings.

All directors attended at least 75% of the number of meetings of the Board and committees of the Board on which they served that were held during the period he or she served as a director. All directors are encouraged to attend annual meetings of shareholders, and all attended the 2021 Annual Meeting.

 

Stock Yards Bancorp maintains an Audit Committee,Bank is a Compensation Committee,community bank built on strong core values of trust, character, integrity, sound judgment, personal accountability and respect for others. We are committed to serving our customers’ needs and helping them to achieve their financial goals. Likewise, we are committed to being a good neighbor and investing in the communities in which we live and work, and to supporting our fellow team members by cultivating a healthy work environment in which they can grow and succeed together and individually. This means providing the products and services necessary to help our individual customers and their families reach their financial goals, assisting our business customers to grow and expand their businesses and extending access to banking and financial resources to all segments of our communities, including the underbanked. We recognize that environmental, social and governance (“ESG”) principles are important to delivering on those commitments and maintaining our core values.

In 2022, we published our inaugural Corporate Responsibility Report. The report identifies our ongoing practices and recent accomplishments in the areas of environmental risk and impact management, social responsibility, including diversity, equity and inclusion, and governance. It highlights many of the initiatives occurring both within the Bank and in our communities to promote the interests of our various stakeholders – our customers, team members, communities and shareholders. We encourage you to review the entire report, which is available on our website at www.syb.com. Neither our Corporate Responsibility Report nor any other content appearing on our website is deemed to be a part of, or incorporated by reference into, this Proxy Statement.

Highlights of our ESG efforts are summarized below:

Governance and Accountability

All officers and employees are required to adhere to our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics and annually affirm their continued understanding and compliance with its principles and guidelines.

Employees receive regular quarterly reminders of our “Do the Right Thing” policy and their responsibility to report questionable business practices.

We provide a third party hotline for employees to report concerns about questionable business or financial practices anonymously and without fear of retaliation or dismissal.

Responsibility toOur Customers

We supported our customers’ financial needs through the pandemic by completing approximately 5,500 loans under the Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) totaling $918 million.

We extended customer access to financial products and services with online banking, mobile banking, text banking and telebanking in English and Spanish

Our website is ADA accessible and includes financial calculators to improve financial literacy

We provide numerous learning opportunities for customers through in-person educational sessions on topics ranging from cybersecurity and fraud awareness to assisting first-time home buyers and teaching teens financial literacy.

We offer a number of mortgage and financial assistance programs to remove barriers to homeownership, particularly for first-time home buyers, and reduce blight in distressed neighborhoods.

Our employees are expected to communicate with customers in a clear, truthful and complete manner to assure clarity and transparency in all our business relationships.

Responsibility to Our Employees

We offer competitive pay that includes annual performance and merit-based bonuses and generous paid time-off policies, and a comprehensive benefits package that includes a 401(k) and employee stock ownership plan with a substantial company matching contribution

Our commitment to employees’ financial wellness and personal wellbeing includes educational opportunities and guidance for wealth management and estate planning, training and professional development programs and fully-funded wellness programs that reward employees for healthy behaviors.

13

We recognize employees for their extraordinary efforts and innovative ideas with quarterly achievement awards, and their time and investment in reaching the Bank’s goals with service anniversary rewards.

We provide numerous opportunities for career advancement and professional development through online learning libraries, our management training program and general banking schools.

Our commitment to diversity, equity and inclusion is reflected in the overall representation of minorities and women in our workforce, including increasing representation on senior leadership teams – nearly 30% of our senior vice presidents are female and 7% are minorities.

Responsibility to Our Community

We created a new leadership positon, Director of Community Engagement and Outreach, in 2021 to work proactively to establish and maintain strong relationships with community-based charitable and non-profit organizations in support of our community reinvestment and fair lending programs.

Our employees make significant contributions of their time and talent to our communities through volunteer activities – over 4,000 hours were spent on volunteer boards in 2021

Our employees are generous financial supporters of civic, cultural and emergency relief activities with more than $130,000 contributed to nonprofit organizations across our markets in 2021.

Awards and Recognition

As a testament to the strong culture, inclusive environment and numerous benefits we are committed to providing our employees, we were recognized in 2022 by American Banker as one of the “Best Banks to Work For”, which evaluates employee satisfaction, as well as the policies and employee benefits of each institution. We were honored to be one of only 90 institutions in the country to make the list for 2022.

Board Oversight of ESG Matters

As we are early in our ESG journey, we have only begun to establish Board-level oversight for ESG matters. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for monitoring and a Risk Committee of the Board of Directors.overseeing our ESG policies, practices and strategies. The Bank maintains a Trust Committee of the Board of Directors. Each of these committees operates under a written charter approved by the Board of Directors. The charters are available on the investor relations page of our website, www.syb.com. Current members of each of these committees are identified below.

Director

Audit

Committee

Compensation

Committee

Nominating

And

Corporate

Governance

Committee

Risk

Committee

Trust

Committee

Shannon B. Arvin

Paul J. Bickel III

J. McCauley Brown

David P. Heintzman

Chair

Donna L. Heitzman

Chair

Carl G. Herde 1

Chair

James A. Hillebrand 3

Richard A. Lechleiter 1

Chair

Stephen M. Priebe 2

Chair

Edwin S. Saunier

John L. Schutte

Kathy C. Thompson 3

1

Audit Committee Financial Expert

2

Lead Independent Director

3

Mr. Hillebrand and Ms. Thompson are both management directors and do not serve on any Board committees.

Audit Committee

The Board of Directors of Stock Yards Bancorp maintains an Audit Committee comprised of directors who are not officers of Stock Yards Bancorp. Each member of the Audit Committee meets the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and NASDAQ independence requirements for membership on an audit committee and each is financially literate within the meaning of the NASDAQ listing rules.

The Audit Committee oversees Stock Yards Bancorp’s financial reporting process on behalf of the Board of Directors. Management has primary responsibility for the financial statements and the reporting process including the systems of internal controls. In fulfilling its oversight responsibilities, the Committee, among other matters, considers the appointment of the external auditors for Stock Yards Bancorp, reviews with the auditors the plan and scope of the audit and audit fees, monitors the adequacy of reporting and internal controls, meets regularly with internal and external auditors, reviews the independence of the external auditors, reviews Stock Yards Bancorp’s financial results as reported in SEC filings, and approves all audit and permitted non-audit services performed by its external auditors. The Committee reviews and evaluates identified related party transactions and discusses with management the Company’s major financial risk exposures and the steps management has taken to monitor and control those exposures. The Audit Committee meets with our management at least quarterly to consider the adequacy of our internal controls and the objectivity of our financial reporting. This Committee also meets with the external auditors and with our internal auditors regarding these matters. Both the independent auditors and the internal auditors regularly meet privately with this Committee and have unrestricted access to this Committee. The Audit Committee held five meetings during 2021.

12

The Board of Directors has determined that Messrs. Herde and Lechleiter are audit committee financial experts for Stock Yards Bancorp and are independent as described in the paragraph above. We refer you to the section captioned “REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE” on page 55 of this Proxy Statement for more information about the role and responsibility of the Audit Committee in the Company’s financial reporting process.

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

The Board of Directors of Stock Yards Bancorp maintains a Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. Each member of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee meets the NASDAQ independence requirements for membershipexpects to engage with management on a nominatingregular basis on our ESG initiatives and to receive periodic updates on developments related to ESG and associated governance committee. Responsibilities of the Committee are set forth in a written charter satisfying the NASDAQ’s corporate governance standards, requirements of federal securities law and incorporating other best practices.issues.

 

Among the Committee’s primary duties are identifying and evaluating candidates for election to the Board of Directors, including consideration of candidates suggested by shareholders, and developing a Board succession strategy. The Committee also assists the Board in determining the composition of Board committees, assessing the Board’s effectiveness and developing and implementing the Company’s corporate governance guidelines. This Committee held four meetings during 2021.

Compensation Committee

The Board of Directors of Stock Yards Bancorp maintains a Compensation Committee. Each member of the Compensation Committee meets the NASDAQ independence requirements for membership on the Compensation Committee. The responsibilities of this Committee include oversight of executive and Board compensation and related programs. The Compensation Committee held seven meetings during 2021. We refer you to the section captioned “REPORT ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION” beginning on page 24 of this Proxy Statement for more information about the role and responsibilities of the Compensation Committee in our executive compensation program and its activities during 2021.

Risk Committee

The Board of Directors of Stock Yards Bancorp maintains a Risk Committee. This Committee is responsible for monitoring the Bank’s commercial and consumer loan portfolio and the related credit risk. The Committee reviews and discusses with management its assessment of asset quality and trends in asset quality, credit quality administration and underwriting standards and the effectiveness of portfolio risk management systems. The Committee is also responsible for reviewing and approving significant lending and credit policies and compliance with those policies. Additionally, the Risk Committee has oversight responsibility for a wide range of enterprise-related risks within the Bank, including regulatory compliance, information security, cybersecurity, insurance and physical security. The Risk Committee held six regular meetings in 2021.

Trust Committee

The Board of Directors of Stock Yards Bank maintains a Trust Committee. The Trust Committee oversees the operations of the wealth management and trust department of the Bank to help ensure it operates in accordance with sound fiduciary principles and is in compliance with pertinent laws and regulations. This Committee held six meetings in 2021.

PROPOSAL 1: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

 

Board Size and Term of Office

 

Our Bylaws specify that the Board of Directors shall consist of not less than nine nor more than 20 directors. Within this range, the number of directors to be elected at each annual meeting of shareholders may be fixed from time to time by resolution of the Board of Directors adopted prior to the giving of notice of the meeting or by later resolution adopted by the shareholders at the annual meeting. The Board of Directors has fixed the number of directors to be elected at the 20222023 Annual Meeting at 12. As described in the section captioned “Commonwealth Bancshares Investor Agreement” on page 18, we intend to expand the size of the Board following the Annual Meeting to 13 directors and appoint one former director of Commonwealth Bancshares, Inc., which we acquired effective March 7, 2022, to our Board of Directors.13.

13

 

Directors serve a one-year term and hold office until the Annual Meeting following the year of their election and until his or her successor is elected and qualified, subject to his or her death, resignation, retirement, removal or disqualification.

 

All of the Company’s directors also currently serve as directors of the Bank. If elected, all of the nominees for election at the Annual Meeting are expected to serve or continue serving as Bank directors following the meeting.

 

Nominees for Election

 

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of the Board of Directors has presented a slate of 1213 nominees for election as directors at the 20222023 Annual Meeting. If elected, we expect that all of the nominees will serve as directors and hold office until the 20232024 annual meeting of shareholders and until their respective successors have been elected and qualified. However, if for any reason a nominee should become unable or unwilling to serve, proxies may be voted for another person nominated as a substitute by the Board of Directors, or the Board may reduce the number of directors to be elected. The Board has no reason to believe that any nominee will be unable or unwilling to serve as a director if elected.

 

14

The Board of Directors presently consists of 1214 members. One current director, Donna L. Heitzman,J. McCauley Brown, will reach herhis mandatory retirement age before the date of the 20222023 Annual Meeting and will not stand for re-election at the Annual Meeting. All nominees with the exception of Philip S. Poindexter currently serve on our Board of Directors and, other than Shannon B. ArvinAllison J. Donovan and Edwin S. Saunier,Laura L. Wells, were last elected to the Board of Directors by shareholders at the 2021 Annual Meeting. Mr. Poindexter is standing for election for the first time at the 2022 Annual Meeting. Ms. Arvin and Mr. Saunier are each former directors of Kentucky Bancshares, Inc. and wereDonovan was appointed to our Board of Directors in July 2021November 2022. Ms. Wells is a former director of Commonwealth Bancshares, Inc. and was appointed to our Board of Directors in May 2022 following completion of our acquisition of KentuckyCommonwealth Bancshares in May 2021.March 2022.

 

Except for Ms.Mses. Arvin and Wells and Mr. Saunier, there are no arrangements or understandings between or among any of the nominees, directors or executive officers and any other person pursuant to which any of our nominees, directors or executive officers have been selected for their respective positions. We refer you to the section captioned “Commonwealth Bancshares Investor Agreement” on page 1821 of this Proxy Statement for a discussion of our agreement with the principal shareholders of Commonwealth Bancshares to consider and, if acceptable to Stock Yards, nominate a qualified individual designated by the principal shareholders for election to our Board of Directors.

 

There are no family relationships between any of our directors or executive officers and any other directors or executive officers.

 

Unless otherwise directed, shares represented by a properly submitted proxy will be voted for the election of each nominee. Proxies cannot be voted at the Annual Meeting for a greater number of persons than the 1213 nominees named in this Proxy Statement.

 

To be elected in an uncontested election, a director nominee must receive a majority of the total votes cast for his or her election. Because we did not receive advance notice by the deadline established in our Bylaws of any shareholder nominees for director, this election of directors is an uncontested election.


15

 

The following table contains information about the 1213 nominees for election at the Annual Meeting. Each nominee has consented to being named in this Proxy Statement and agreed to serve as a director if elected.

 

Name

Age (1) 

Independent

Director

Since

Principal Occupation (3)

Other Public

Company

Boards

Age (1) 

Independent

Director

Since

Principal Occupation (2)

Other Public

Company
Boards

Shannon B. Arvin

47

2021

President and CEO, Keeneland Association

None

48

2021

President and CEO, Keeneland Association

None

     

Paul J. Bickel III

66

2017

President, U.S. Specialties

None

67

2017

President, U.S. Specialties

None

     

J. McCauley Brown

69

2015

Retired Vice President, Brown-Forman Corporation

None

     
     

Allison J. Donovan

42

2022

Member, Stoll Keenon Ogden PLLC

None

David P. Heintzman

62

1992

Former Chairman of the Boards and Retired Chief Executive Officer, Stock Yards Bancorp, Inc. and Stock Yards Bank & Trust Company

None

63

1992

Former Chairman of the Boards and Retired Chief Executive Officer, Stock Yards Bancorp, Inc. and Stock Yards Bank & Trust Company

None

Carl G. Herde

61

2005

Vice President/Financial Policy,

Kentucky Hospital Association

None

62

2005

Vice President/Financial Policy,

Kentucky Hospital Association

None

     

James A. Hillebrand

53

 

2008

Chairman of the Boards and Chief Executive Officer,

Stock Yards Bancorp, Inc. and Stock Yards Bank & Trust Company

None

54

 

2008

Chairman of the Boards and Chief Executive Officer,

Stock Yards Bancorp, Inc. and Stock Yards Bank & Trust Company

None

     

Richard A. Lechleiter (2)

63

2007

President, Catholic Education Foundation of Louisville

1

     

Richard A. Lechleiter

64

2007

President, Catholic Education Foundation of Louisville

None

Philip S. Poindexter

55

 

-

President, Stock Yards Bancorp, Inc. and Stock Yards Bank & Trust Company

None

56

 

2022

President, Stock Yards Bancorp, Inc. and Stock Yards Bank & Trust Company

None

     

Stephen M. Priebe

58

2012

President, Hall Contracting of Kentucky

None

59

2012

President, Hall Contracting of Kentucky

None

     

Edwin S. Saunier

64

2021

President, Saunier North American, Inc.

None

65

2021

President, Saunier North American, Inc.

None

     

John L. Schutte

58

2018

Chief Executive Officer,

GeriMed, Inc.

None

59

2018

Chief Executive Officer,

GeriMed, Inc.

None

     

Kathy C. Thompson

60

 

1994

Senior Executive Vice President, Stock Yards Bancorp, Inc.

and Stock Yards Bank & Trust Company, Director of

the Bank’s Wealth Management and Trust Department

None

61

 

1994

Senior Executive Vice President, Stock Yards Bank & Trust Company, Director of

the Bank’s Wealth Management and Trust Department

None

Laura L. Wells

48

2022

Freelance Journalist

None

 

(1)

Ages listed are as of December 31, 2022.

(2)

(1)      Ages listed are as of December 31, 2021.

(2)    Mr. Lechleiter is a director of Amedisys, Inc., a publicly-traded healthcare services company.

(3)Each nominee has been engaged in his or her principal occupation or employment for five years or more with the exception of Ms. Arvin and Messrs. Heintzman, Hillebrand and Poindexter.

 

1516

 

Board Composition

 

Our nominees for director represent a balance of skills, experience and perspectives that provide effective leadership and oversight of the Company’s business and are aligned with our business and strategies, particularly our community bank orientation. The following charts present information on the composition of our Board of Directors. Diversity data is based on information self-identified by each nominee to the Company.

 

diversitygraph.jpg

a08.jpg

Board Diversity Factors

 

The following chart provides certain demographic information about the 1213 director nominees. Diversity characteristics are based on information self-identified by each nominee to the Company.

 

Board Diversity Matrix (As of March 10, 2022)

Board Diversity Matrix (As of March 10, 2023)

Board Diversity Matrix (As of March 10, 2023)

Total Number of Directors

12

13

Female

Male

Non-Binary

Did Not
Disclose
Gender

Female

Male

Non-

Binary

Did Not
Disclose
Gender

Part I: Gender Identity

        

Directors

2

8

0

2

4

7

 

2

Part II: Demographic Background

        

African American or Black

0

0

0

0

1

   

Alaskan Native or Native American

0

0

0

0

Alaskan Native or American Indian

    

Asian

0

0

0

0

    

Hispanic or Latino

0

0

0

0

Hispanic or Latinx

    

Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander

0

0

0

0

    

White

2

8

0

0

4

7

  

Two or More Races or Ethnicities

0

0

0

0

1

   

LGBTQ+

0

 

Did Not Disclose Demographic Background

2

2

 

16
17

 

Director Skills Matrix

The matrix shown below identifies certain skills, qualifications and experience that the Board believes are relevant to our business and achievement of our long-term strategy. An individual director may possess other skills, qualifications and experience not indicated in the matrix that may also be relevant and valuable to their service on our Board.

Qualifications and Experience

 Arvin

 Bickel

 Donovan

 Heintzman

 Herde

 Hillebrand

 Lechleiter

 Poindexter

 Priebe

 Saunier

 Schutte

 Thompson

 Wells

  Total

Executive Leadership

x

x

x

x

x

x

9

Accounting/Financial Reporting

x

x

x

6

Commercial Real Estate

x

x

 2

Legal and Regulatory

x

x

x

x

 7

Sales and Marketing

x

x

x

x

8

Community Engagement

x

x

x

x

9

Banking and Financial Services

x

x

x

7

Mergers and Acquisitions

x

x

x

x

x

8

Strategic Planning

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

11

Risk Management

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

8

Corporate Governance

x

x

5

Small Business

x

x

5

Customer Experience

x

x

x

x

x

x

11

Executive Leadership

Experience in an executive leadership position that provides the skill and perspective to understand and direct business operations, manage human capital, analyze risk, manage organizational change and develop and implement strategic plans.

Accounting/Financial Reporting

Knowledge of or experience in accounting, financial reporting or auditing processes that assists the Board in overseeing our financial condition, financial management systems and the effectiveness of our internal controls, and ensuring accuracy and transparency in financial reporting and disclosure.

Commercial Real Estate

Experience as investors, owners and developers in the development operation and financing of commercial real estate projects in our market areas that assists the Board in overseeing and evaluating risk in our commercial real estate loan portfolio.

Legal and Regulatory

Knowledge of and experience in legal and regulatory matters, particularly regulated business, that assists the Board in understanding and analyzing legal regulatory and compliance requirements and related risks and advising management with regard to relationships with our regulators.

Sales and Marketing

Experience in managing sales and marketing activities, particularly for new products and markets and the adoption and use of digital marketing strategies that assists the Board in developing strategies to attract and retain customers and grow market share in each of our markets.

Community Engagement

Leadership experience with civic, charitable or community service organizations or in governmental or public policy roles that positively impact the reputation, image and public profile of our company in our local communities.

18

Banking and Financial Services

Experience in the banking or financial services industry that assists the Board in understanding the key drivers of success in our core lines of business, including the development of innovative financial products and services to meet the changing banking needs of our customers.

Mergers and Acquisitions

Leadership experience with the planning, analysis and execution of mergers and acquisitions transactions and the integration of people, operations and systems that assists the Board in evaluating business development opportunities to complement our core strategy of organic growth.

Strategic Planning

Experience in the development and implementation of operating plans and business strategies.

Risk Management

Knowledge of or experience with oversight of corporate risk and risk management functions that assists the Board in identifying and evaluating the key areas of risk within our company and establishing an appropriate framework for managing and controlling risk.

Corporate Governance

Knowledge of public company governance practices and policies that assists the Board in considering and adopting sound governance practices, adherence to high standards or ethical business conduct and understanding the impact of those policies and practices on our business.

Small Business

Experience in ownership and/or managerial positions with small and medium size businesses that assists the Board in understanding the banking and credit needs of this segment of our customer base and how the Bank interacts with its commercial and business customers.

Customer Experience

Experience in consumer-focused businesses that assists the Board in developing strategies to strengthen brand awareness and customer loyalty, build customer relationships, attract new customers and enhance the overall customer experience.

Additional Information Regarding the Background and Qualifications of Director Nominees

 

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee considers the particular experience, qualifications, attributes and expertise of each nominee for election to the Board. Having directors with different points of view, professional experience, education and skills provides broader perspectives and more diverse considerations valuable to the directors as they fulfill their leadership roles. Potential Board candidates are evaluated based upon various criteria, including:

 

Direct industry knowledge, broad-based business experience, or professional skills that indicate the candidate will make a significant and immediate contribution to the Board’s discussion and decision-making in the array of complex issues facing Bancorp;

Behavior and reputation that indicate he or she is committed to the highest ethical standards and the values of Bancorp;

Special skills, expertise, and background that add to and complement the range of skills, expertise, and background of the existing directors;

The ability to contribute to broad Board responsibilities, including succession planning, management development, and strategic planning; and

Confidence that the candidate will effectively, consistently, and appropriately take into account and balance the legitimate interests and concerns of all Bancorp’s shareholders in reaching decisions.

 

Directors must have time available to devote to Board activities and to enhance their knowledge of Stock Yards Bancorp and the banking industry.

19

 

Below is a summary of the Committee’s consideration and evaluation of each director nominee.

 

Ms. Arvin currently serves as the eighth President and CEO of the Keeneland Association. Prior to this, Ms. Arvin was a member of the Lexington, Kentucky law firm of Stoll Keenon Ogden, and served on the firm’s Board of Directors and Executive Committee. Ms. Arvin also served as corporate counsel to Keeneland since 2008, and as secretary and member of Keeneland’s Board of Directors since 2015. Also, Ms. Arvin currently holds the following positions: Trustee of The Lexington School, and Thoroughbred Owners and Breeders Association, Member of The Jockey Club, Board and Executive Committee Member of the Gluck Equine Foundation, Board Member of Bluegrass Care Navigators, Thoroughbred Racing Associations/Thoroughbred Racing Protective Bureau and the National Thoroughbred Racing Association. In connection with our acquisition of Kentucky Bancshares, Inc. in May 2021, we agreed to expand the size of our Boards of Directors by two directors and fill the resulting vacancies with two Kentucky Bancshares directors. We identified Ms. Arvin as one of the two former Kentucky Bancshares directors to be added to our Boards following completion of the acquisition. Ms. Arvin serves on the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of Bancorp and chairs the Bank’s Trust Committee.

 

Mr. Bickel is founder and President of U.S. Specialties, a commercial building supply company. He has served as the managing member of several real estate development organizations in the Louisville, Kentucky area over the past 30 years. Outside of commercial endeavors, Mr. Bickel has been very active in the Louisville community, serving in a leadership capacity on numerous area non-profit boards. Mr. Bickel serves on the RiskAudit Committee of Bancorp and the Bank’s Trust Committee.

 

Mr. BrownMs. Donovan retired asis a ViceMember in the Lexington, Kentucky office of Stoll Keenon Ogden PLLC, a regional law firm practicing out of five cities in Kentucky and Indiana. Ms. Donovan has been with the firm since 2006 and concentrates primarily on corporate, securities, mergers and acquisitions and banking matters. She is a director and the immediate past President of Brown-Forman Corporation, a Fortune 1,000 company basedthe Kentucky Bar Foundation, and has previously served on other community nonprofit boards, including the American Heart Association and the John W. Rowe Foundation, Inc. Ms. Donovan has previously participated in Louisville,Leadership Central Kentucky in 2015. Hisand the Leadership Council on Legal Diversity Fellows program. Her extensive experience in business, managementbanking and accounting, and his deep ties to the Louisville community, bring valuable local and global perspectivescorporate law, as well as her previous experience as a director of another Kentucky-based banking institution, provide additional expertise to our Board. Additionally, his widespread commitment to community organizations in LouisvilleBoard and beyond gives him a strong sense ofwill complement the needs, prospects and potentialcontributions of our region. Mr. Brownother directors as we continue to develop and execute on our long-term strategies. Ms. Donovan serves on the Risk Committee and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of Bancorp and the Bank’s Trust Committee.Bancorp.

 

Mr. Heintzman retired as Chief Executive Officer of Bancorp and the Bank as of September 30, 2018. From October 1, 2018 through December 31, 2018, he held the position of Executive Chairman and he continued to serve as non-executive Chairman of the Boards of Bancorp and the Bank until January 1, 2021. Mr. Heintzman holds an accounting degree, and prior to joining the Bank, worked as a certified public accountant for an international accounting firm. He joined the Bank in 1985 and, prior to his appointment as Chief Executive Officer, held a series of executive positions, including Chief Financial Officer, Executive Vice President and President. In January 2005, he assumed the position of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Heintzman was instrumental in the Bank’s growth strategies and profitable execution. His commitment to ethical standards set the example for the Bank and its employees, and his tenure and experience in all areas of the business provide a unique perspective of the business and strategic direction of the Company. Mr. Heintzman chairs the Risk Committee of Bancorp and serves on the Bank’s Trust Committee.Audit Committee of Bancorp. He has been designated by the Board of Directors as an audit committee financial expert.

17

 

Mr. Herde holds an accounting degree, is a Certified Public Accountant and joined Baptist Healthcare System, Inc., one of the largest not-for-profit health care systems in Kentucky, in 1984 as controller. He served as the Chief Financial Officer from 1993 until his retirement from Baptist in September 2016. He now serves as the Vice President/Financial Policy for the Kentucky Hospital Association. He has extensive experience in financial reporting and corporate finance. Mr. Herde chairs the Audit Committee of Bancorp and has been designated by the Board of Directors as an audit committee financial expert. He also serves on the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of Bancorp.

 

Mr. Hillebrand was appointed Chief Executive Officer of Bancorp and the Bank effective October 1, 2018, and assumed the additional roles of Chairman of the Boards of each company effective January 1, 2021. He joined Stock Yards Bank in 1996 as director and developer of the private banking group. Prior to joining the Bank, he was with a regional bank and a community bank where he specialized in private banking. He has directed the expansion of the Bank into the Indianapolis, Cincinnati markets and was named President in 2008.

 

Mr. Lechleiter is the President of the Catholic Education Foundation of Louisville. From February 2002 until his retirement in January 2014, he served as the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Kindred Healthcare, Inc., a Fortune 500 healthcare services company based in Louisville. Mr. Lechleiter also served in senior financial positions at other large publicly held healthcare services companies such as Humana Inc. and HCA, Inc. during his professional financial career spanning nearly 35 years. His extensive experience in business leadership, financial reporting, corporate finance, investor relations, mergers and acquisitions and corporate governance is valuable to the Board. Mr. Lechleiter serves on the Audit Committee of Bancorp and has been designated by the Board of Directors as an audit committee financial expert. He also chairs the Compensation Committee of Bancorp. 

20

 

Mr. Poindexter was appointed President of Bancorp and the Bank in October 2018. He previously served as Chief Lending Officer of the Bank from 2008 until October 2018, and as Executive Vice President and Director of Commercial Banking of the Bank. Mr. Poindexter joined the Bank in 2004. Under his leadership as Chief Lending Officer, the Bank achieved record levels of organic loan growth. Mr. Poindexter has also been instrumental in promoting an active sales and service culture across all departments of the Bank with a focus on increased referral activity that has led to record levels of non-interest income for the Bank.

 

Mr. Priebe is President of Hall Contracting of Kentucky, which provides construction services in the areas of heavy construction, asphalt, civil, pipeline, and highway and bridge construction. A registered professional civil engineer, he began his career at Hall in 1986. Mr. Priebe has had extensive involvement with many civic organizations throughout his career. He has worked with the Kentucky Transportation Cabinet Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Training Program and is actively mentoring a local electric contractor. Mr. Priebe’s business acumen and familiarity with the local and regional economic climate bring valuable perspective to the Board. Mr. Priebe serves as our Lead Independent Director, chairs the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of Bancorp and serves as a member of the Compensation Committee of Bancorp.

 

Mr. Saunier currently serves as President of Saunier North American, Inc., a moving and storage company. Mr. Saunier is a member of the Policy Council of Commerce Lexington in Lexington, Kentucky, Past Chairman of the Winchester Clark County Chamber of Commerce in Winchester, Kentucky, founder of Leadership Winchester and Past President of Thoroughbred Club of America. In connection with our acquisition of Kentucky Bancshares, Inc. in 2021, we agreed to expand the size of our Boards of Directors by two directors and fill the resulting vacancies with two Kentucky Bancshares directors. We identified Mr. Saunier as one of the two former Kentucky Bancshares directors to be added to our Boards following completion of the acquisition. Mr. Saunier serves on the Risk Committee and Compensation Committee of Bancorp.

 

18

Mr. Schutte is Chief Executive Officer of GeriMed, Inc., a nationwide group purchasing organization specializing in long-term care pharmacy services for independent pharmacies that serve long-term care providers, such as nursing homes, assisted living facilities, and hospice, as well as prison populations. In February 2017, he founded MainPointe Pharmaceuticals, a national company that markets and distributes pharmaceuticals as well as over-the-counter products and supplements. He also previously served as Chairman of the Board of VistaPharm, for which he was the largest shareholder, until it was sold in December 2015. Mr. Schutte is also involved in numerous commercial real estate development projects in the Louisville area and elsewhere. His entrepreneurial skills and insights and strong reputation in the Louisville business community are beneficial to the Board. He serves on the Audit Committee and Compensation Committee of Bancorp.Bancorp and the Bank’s Trust Committee.

 

Ms. Thompson joinedis the Bank in 1992 as ManagerDirector of the Wealth ManagementBank’s wealth management and Trust Department.trust department. The department managed approximately $4.8$6.6 billion in assets at December 31, 20212022, and is one of the most profitable bank-owned trust companies in the country. Prior to joining the Company in 1992, Ms. Thompson practiced law for a large law firm in the estate planning and tax group and worked in a regional bank trust company where she focused on investment management, estate, trust and financial planning.

 

Ms. Wells has served as a freelance journalist covering the Near and Middle East for various U.S. and international media outlets since September 2009. She previously worked in institutional research and sales for Merrill Lynch & Co. Additionally, Ms. Wells was the co-founder and CEO of the Turkish office of an international online startup company from December 2010 to February 2012. She previously served as a director of Commonwealth Bancshares, Inc. and Commonwealth Bank and Trust Company from 2016 to 2022. She joined our Board of Directors in May 2022, following our acquisition of Commonwealth Bancshares earlier that year. Her nomination is being made pursuant to the terms of an Investor Agreement between us and the principal shareholders of Commonwealth Bancshares. Ms. Wells serves on the Risk Committee of Bancorp and the Bank’s Trust Committee.

21

Commonwealth Bancshares Investor Agreement

 

On March 7, 2022, we completed the acquisition of Commonwealth Bancshares, Inc. In connection with the acquisition, we entered into an Investor Agreement with the principal shareholders of Commonwealth Bancshares, Darrell R. Wells, Margaret C. Wells and the Darrell R. Wells Trust, which, among other matters, gives the principal shareholders the right to designate a qualified individual to serve on the Stock Yardsour Board of Directors, with the agreement of Stock Yards. We refer to this individual as the “mutually acceptable director”. SubjectThe individual designated by the principal shareholders as the mutually acceptable director will be subject to the annual review and nomination process applicable to all members of our Board of Directors, beginning withDirectors. Laura L. Wells is the 2023 Annual Meeting of Shareholders we will includedirector nominee designated as the mutually acceptable director on the slate of nominees to be electedpursuant to the Boardterms of Directors.the Investor Agreement.

 

Laura L. Wells, a former director of Commonwealth Bancshares and its wholly owned banking subsidiary, Commonwealth Bank & Trust Company, will be the initial mutually acceptable director. Pursuant to our obligation under the Investor Agreement, we will expand the size of our Board to 13 directors and appoint Ms. Wells to the Board of Directors in May 2022.

Director Nomination Process

 

Our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for identifying and recommending director candidates to our Board for nomination. The Board, in coordination with the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, also considers Board leadership succession planning and committee membership.

 

When considering a candidate for membership on the Board, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee assesses a candidate’s independence, qualifications, skills and experience, as compared to the areas of qualifications, skills and experience that the Board has identified as important to be reflected on the Board. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee also evaluates the collective contribution of qualifications, skills and experience relevant to the Company for effective oversight. In the case of incumbent directors, the Committee also considers the director’s attendance and participation at meetings of the Board of Directors and committees on which he or she serves.

 

Although the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee does not have a specific policy governing diversity, it considers, in identifying nominees for director, a nominee’s professional experience, education, qualifications and skills with a view towards having a diversity of viewpoints in the broadest sense being represented on the Board. These considerations include, without limitation, the individual’s interest in Stock Yards, independence, integrity, reputation, business experience, education, accounting and financial expertise, age, race, ethnicity, gender, civic and community relationships and knowledge and experience in matters impacting financial institutions.

 

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee engages in regular discussions of board and director succession matters, including plans for identifying potential candidates to fill positions vacated by retiring directors. Several of our existing directors will reach our mandatory retirement age over the course of the next few years. As the Committee seeks to identify qualified individuals to fill those vacancies and considers the overall composition of the Board, the Committee is committed to broadening the diversity of our Board and expects to actively consider race and ethnicity as additional factors in the evaluation of its potential director candidates. During 2022, we expanded the diversity of the Board through the addition of one director from the underrepresented community, Allison J. Donovan.

19

 

With respect to incumbent directors considered for re-election, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee also assesses each director’s performance, contribution, level of engagement, and meeting attendance record. In addition, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee determines whether nominees are in a position to devote an adequate amount of time to the effective performance of director duties.

 

Shareholder Nominations

 

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will consider candidates for nomination as a director submitted by shareholders. The Committee evaluates individuals recommended by shareholders for nomination as directors according to the same criteria discussed above and in accordance with the Company’s bylaws and the procedures describe under “Shareholder Proposals and Director Nominations” on page 76 of this Proxy Statement.

 

Director Independence

 

Our Board of Directors, through a process managed by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, conducts an annual review of director independence. During this review, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee considers transactions and relationships between each director or any member of his or her immediate family and the Company. The purpose of this review is to determine whether any such relationships or transactions are inconsistent with a determination that the director is independent.

 

As a result of this review, and based upon the advice and recommendations of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, the Board of Directors has affirmatively determined that Messrs. Bickel, Brown, Heintzman, Herde, Lechleiter, Priebe, Saunier and Schutte and Ms.Mses. Arvin, Donovan and Wells satisfy the independence requirements of the NASDAQ Stock Market. As current employees of the Bank, Messrs. Hillebrand and Poindexter and Ms. Thompson do not satisfy these requirements. The Board of Directors also previously determined that Ms. HeitzmanMr. Brown satisfied the NASDAQ independence requirements during herhis most recent year of service as a director prior to retirement.

22

 

In performing its independence review, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee noted that the Bank has made charitable donations to the Catholic Education Foundation of Louisville, of which Mr. Lechleiter is the President.President, regularly engages Stoll Keenon Ogden PLLC, of which Ms. Donovan is a member, for legal services and leases warehouse space for storage from Mr. Saunier. However, the Committee determined that this relationship was notnone of these relationships were material to the director or his or her affiliated organization.

 

Director Election Standard

 

Our Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws require majority voting for the election of directors in uncontested elections. This means that the director nominees in an uncontested election for directors must receive a number of votes cast “for” his or her election that exceeds the number of votes cast “against.” The Company’s corporate governance guidelines further provide that any incumbent director who does not receive a majority of “for” votes in an uncontested election must, within five days following the certification of the election results, tender to the Chairman of the Board his or her resignation from the Board. The resignation will specify that it is effective upon the Board’s acceptance of the resignation. The Board will, through a process managed by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and excluding the nominee in question, accept or reject the resignation within 90 days after certification of the shareholder vote. The Board will promptly communicate any action taken on the resignation.

 

Director Stock Ownership

 

All non-management directors are required to own Common Stock equal in value to at least $200,000five times the amount of their annual cash retainer fee within threefive years of joining the Board and to maintain that minimum ownership level for the remainder of their service as a director. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee may exercise its discretion in enforcing the guidelines when the accumulation of Common Stock is affected by the price of Bancorp stock or changes in director compensation. Management directors also have ownership targets described elsewhere in this Proxy Statement.

 

Director Retirement Policy

 

Our Board does not have a term limits policy. Our Corporate Governance Guidelines establish a mandatory retirement age of 70 for all directors. Our retirement age policy is intended to recognize the valuable perspectives, knowledge and experience provided by our longer-tenured directors while also facilitating the Board’s recruitment of new directors with appropriate backgrounds and skills and provide for an orderly transition of leadership on the Board and its committees. In accordance with this policy, one incumbent director, Donna L. Heitzman,J. McCauley Brown, is not standing for re-election at the 20222023 Annual Meeting. The Board has not in the past, nor does it expect in the future to, grant waivers or exemptions from the retirement age policy.

Director Compensation

The Compensation Committee is responsible for reviewing and recommending to the Board the compensation paid to our non-employee directors. The Compensation Committee, with advice and assistance from McLagan, its independent consultant, reviews the compensation of our non-employee directors at least every two years. Their review of director compensation includes surveys of peer data from other institutions and the related form and substance of how directors are compensated, including comparative analyses of the Company’s director compensation program relative to its peer group. The compensation program for our non-employee directors consists of a combination of cash and equity. Directors of the Company who are employees of the Bank receive no additional compensation for their service as directors of the Company or the Bank.

23

The following table outlines the director compensation structure in effect during 2022:

  

Member Cash

Retainer

  

Member

Equity

Retainer

  

Member Per

Meeting Fee

  

Chair

Additional

Cash

Retainer

  

Lead Director

Additional

Cash Retainer

 

Board of Directors

 $18,000  $35,000  $1,625   -  $7,500 
                     

Audit Committee

  -   -   1,200  $11,000   - 
                     

Compensation Committee

  -   -   800   7,500   - 
                     

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

  -   -   800   6,000   - 
                     

Risk Committee

  -   -   900   9,000   - 
                     

Trust Committee

  -   -   800   5,000   - 

Directors may defer all or a portion of their fees pursuant to the Director Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan (the “Director NQ Plan”), and the amounts so deferred then increase or decrease in value based on how the director elects that the account be allocated as among various investment options provided by the Bank. The investment options are currently the same options available under the Executive NQ Plan, except that directors may also direct that their fees be invested in Company stock, which is then actually purchased and held in trust at the Bank. At December 31, 2022, approximately 94 percent of the aggregate amounts owed directors under the Director NQ Plan were invested in the Company’s stock.

In November 2022, the Compensation Committee reviewed a report prepared by McLagan with respect to the Company’s average director compensation for 2022 compared to the average director compensation program for 2021 for the compensation peer group selected by McLagan and approved by the Compensation Committee. The McLagan report noted, amount other findings, that since the last director compensation review performed in 2020, the Company’s recent acquisitions and organic growth have resulted in a significant increase in peer group median revenue, and market median compensation for directors has followed that trend. Given the Company’s significant growth over the past two years and the relatively minor historical increases in director compensation, our average director compensation has moved substantially below the market median. After taking into account the information contained in the McLagan report, the Compensation Committee determined it was appropriate to recommend to the Board changes to the compensation amounts for non-employee directors for the two-year compensation period beginning January 1, 2023, to restore the positioning of our director compensation program relative to our peer group. Acting upon the recommendation of the Compensation Committee, the Board approved the following changes to director compensation amounts effective January 1, 2023:

  

Member Cash

Retainer

  

Member

Equity

Retainer

  

Member Per

Meeting Fee

  

Chair

Additional

Cash

Retainer

  

Lead Director

Additional

Cash Retainer

 

Board of Directors

 $42,000  $50,000  $1,625   -  $20,000 
                     

Audit Committee

  -   -   1,200  $15,000   - 
                     

Compensation Committee

  -   -   800   12,000   - 
                     

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

  -   -   800   3,000   - 
                     

Risk Committee

  -   -   900   9,000   - 
                     

Trust Committee

  -   -   800   4,000   - 

 

2024

2022 Director Compensation

The following table sets forth information regarding the compensation of our non-employee directors for 2022. Messrs. Hillebrand and Poindexter and Ms. Thompson serve as directors for the Company but receive no compensation for their director service.

                  

Change in Pension

         
                  

Value and

         
              

Non-Equity

  

Nonqualified

         
  

Fees Earned

  

Stock

  

Option

  

Incentive Plan

  

Deferred Compensation

  

All Other

     
  

or Paid in Cash

  

Awards

  

Awards

  

Compensation

  

Earnings

  

Compensation

  

Total

 

Name

 ($)  ($)(1)  ($)(2)  ($)  ($)(3)  ($)(4)  ($)(5) 

Ms. Arvin

  38,700   35,000   -   -   -   617   74,317 

Mr. Bickel

  40,400   35,000   -   -   -   617   76,017 

Mr. Brown

  38,200   35,000   -   -   -   617   73,817 

Ms. Donovan

  6,325   -   12,720   -   -   -   19,045 

Mr. Heintzman

  49,400   35,000   -   -   -   617   85,017 

Mr. Herde

  52,400   35,000   -   -   -   617   88,017 

Mr. Lechleiter

  51,300   35,000   -   -   -   617   86,917 

Mr. Priebe

  53,300   35,000   -   -   -   617   88,917 

Mr. Saunier

  42,000   35,000   -   -   -   617   77,617 

Mr. Schutte

  43,800   35,000   -   -   -   617   79,417 

Ms. Wells

  26,125   -   20,260   -   -   -   46,385 

(1)

In January 2022 each non-employee director then serving on the Board of Directors received a restricted stock unit award under the 2015 Omnibus Equity Compensation Plan. The number of shares granted was equal to $35,000 divided by the fair market value per share on the grant date. Based on the closing price of the Common Stock on the grant date, each director received 541 shares. The restricted stock unit awards, together with all dividend equivalents thereon, fully vest one year from the date of grant.

(2)

Represents 1,000 SARs for each director valued using a Black Scholes value of $12.72 (Ms. Donovan) and $20.26 (Ms. Wells), respectively, per right.

(3)

Each director has the option of deferring some or all of their fees. Investment options include Company stock and various mutual funds. Earnings on the non-employee directors' nonqualified deferred compensation balances are not included above. The investment alternatives of the nonqualified plan do not and have not offered above market rates of interest or preferential returns.

(4)

Represents dividends on 2022 restricted stock unit awards. Dividends are held until awards vest. As such, dividends on the shares earned in 2022 were paid in January 2023.

 

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE FOR THE ELECTION OF EACH OF THESE NOMINEES

 

PROPOSAL 2: RATIFICATION OF THE SELECTION OF THE INDEPENDENT

REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

The Audit Committee has selected FORVIS, LLP (formerly BKD, LLPLLP) as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 20222023 and has directed that management submit the selection of the independent registered public accounting firm to shareholders for ratification at the Annual Meeting. The firm of BKD,FORVIS, LLP has served as the Company’s auditors since June 7, 2018. Representatives of BKD,FORVIS, LLP are expected to be present during the meeting, will have an opportunity to make a statement if they so desire and will be available to respond to appropriate questions.

 

25

Shareholder ratification of the selection of BKD,FORVIS, LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm is not required by the Company’s Bylaws or otherwise. However, we are submitting the selection of BKD,FORVIS, LLP to the shareholders for ratification as a matter of sound corporate practice. If the shareholders fail to ratify the selection, the Audit Committee will reconsider whether or not to retain BKD,FORVIS, LLP. Even if the selection is ratified, the Audit Committee in its discretion may direct the appointment of a different independent audit firm at any time during the year if it is determined that such a change would be in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders.

 

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE FOR THE RATIFICATION OF THE SELECTION OF BKD,FORVIS, LLP

 

PROPOSAL 3: ADVISORY VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

 

We are asking our shareholders to provide an advisory vote on the compensation of the named executive officers disclosed in the “REPORT ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION” section of this Proxy Statement. We refer to this item throughout this Proxy Statement as the “say-on-pay” proposal. We have included this proposal among the items to be considered at the Annual Meeting pursuant to the requirements of Section 14A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. While this vote is non-binding on our Company and the Board of Directors, it will provide the Compensation Committee with information regarding investor sentiment regarding our executive compensation philosophy, policies and practices which the Committee will be able to consider when determining future executive compensation arrangements. Our current policy is to hold an advisory vote on executive compensation each year. We expectIn Proposal 4, we are asking our shareholders to hold the nextvote on an advisory vote at our 2023 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.basis for their preferred frequency for conducting future say-on-pay votes. Following is a summary of some of the key points of our 20212022 executive compensation program. SeeYou should refer to the section captioned “REPORT ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION” section beginning on page 2431 of this Proxy Statement for more information about our 20212022 executive compensation.

 

The pay-for-performance compensation philosophy of the Compensation Committee supports Stock Yards Bancorp’s primary objective of creating value for its shareholders. The Committee strives to ensure that compensation of Stock Yards Bancorp’s executive officers is market-competitive to attract and retain talented individuals to lead Stock Yards Bancorp and the Bank to growth and higher profitability while maintaining stability and capital strength. Our executive compensation program has been designed to align managements’ interests with those of our shareholders. In addition, the program seeks to mitigate risks related to compensation. In designing the 20212022 compensation program, the Compensation Committee used key performance measurements to motivate our executive officers to achieve short-term and long-term business goals after reviewing peer and market data and the Company’s business expectations for 2021.2022.

 

We believe that the information provided regarding executive compensation in this Proxy Statement demonstrates that our executive compensation program was designed appropriately and is working to maximize shareholder return while mitigating risk and aligning managements’ interests with our shareholders. Accordingly, the Board of Directors recommends that shareholders approve the following advisory resolution:

 

21

RESOLVED, that the shareholders of Stock Yards Bancorp, Inc. approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation paid to the Company’s named executive officers as disclosed in the Stock Yards Bancorp, Inc. 20222023 Proxy Statement pursuant to the executive compensation disclosure rules of the SEC, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the Summary Compensation Table and the other executive compensation tables and related narratives.

 

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE FOR THE APPROVAL OF THE COMPENSATION OF OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AS DESCRIBED IN THIS PROXY STATEMENTSAY-ON-PAY PROPOSAL

 

SECURITYPROPOSAL 4: ADVISORY VOTE ON THE FREQUENCY OF FUTURE SAY-ON-PAY VOTES

As described in Proposal 3 above, our shareholders have the opportunity to cast an advisory vote to approve the compensation of our named executive officers. This Proposal 4 affords shareholders the additional opportunity to cast an advisory vote on how often we should include a say-on-pay proposal in our proxy materials for future annual shareholder meetings or any special shareholder meeting for which we must include executive compensation information in the proxy statement for that meeting. We refer to this item throughout this Proxy Statement as the “say-on-frequency” vote. We have included this proposal among the items to be considered at the Annual Meeting pursuant to the requirements of Section 14A of the Exchange Act. Under this Proposal 4, shareholders may vote to conduct the say-on-pay vote every year, every two years or every three years. Shareholders that do not have a preference regarding the frequency of future say-on-pay votes may abstain from voting on this proposal.

26

Our shareholders voted on a similar proposal in 2017. At that year’s annual meeting, a majority of our shareholders voted to hold the say-on-pay vote every year, which was the recommendation of our Board of Directors. We continue to believe that say-on-pay votes should be conducted every year so that our shareholders may annually express their views on our executive compensation program.

This vote, like the say-on-pay vote described in Proposal 3 above, is advisory and not binding on the Company or the Board of Directors. Shareholders are not voting to approve or disapprove the Board’s recommendation. However, the Board values the opinions expressed by shareholders in their votes on this proposal and will consider the outcome of the vote when making future decisions regarding the frequency of conducting a say-on-pay vote.

It is expected that the next say-on-frequency vote will occur at the 2029 annual meeting of shareholders.

Shareholders may cast their advisory vote to conduct future say-on-pay votes every “1 Year,” “2 Years” or “3 Years,” or they may abstain from this vote. 

The option of every year, every two years or every three years that receives the highest number of votes cast by shareholders will reflect the shareholders’ preferred frequency for holding future say-on-pay votes. However, because this vote is advisory and not binding on the Board of Directors or the Company, the Board may decide that it is in the best interests of our shareholders and the Company to hold a say-on-pay vote more or less frequently than the option selected by our shareholders.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS THAT YOU SELECT ONE YEAR AS THE PREFERRED FREQUENCY FOR HOLDING FUTURE SAY-ON-PAY VOTES

27

STOCK OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENTINFORMATION

 

Set forth in the following table is the beneficial ownership of our Common Stock as of December 31, 20212022 for each person or entity known by us to beneficially own more than five percent of the outstanding shares of our Common Stock;Stock and for all our directors and executive officers as a group; and directors, executive officers and employees as a group. “Executive officer” means the chairman, president, any vice president in charge of a principal business unit, division or function, or other officer who performs a policy making function or any other person who performs similar policy making functions and is so designated by the Board of Directors. For a description of the voting and investment power with respect to the shares beneficially owned by the current directors, nominees for election as directors and named executive officers of Stock Yards Bancorp and the Bank, see the following tables.

 

  Amount and Nature  Percent of 
  of Beneficial  Stock Yards Bancorp 

Name of Beneficial Owner

 Ownership  Common Stock (1) 
         

BlackRock, Inc.

  1,977,501(2)  6.8%

55 East 52nd Street

        

New York, NY 10055

        
         

The Vanguard Group, Inc.

  1,817,768(3)  6.2%

100 Vanguard Boulevard

        

Malvern, PA 19355

        
         

Darrell R. Wells

  1,691,765(4)  5.8%

Margaret Cowley Wells

        

Darrell R. Wells Trust

        

4350 Brownsboro Road, Suite 310

        

Louisville, KY 40207

        
         

Neuberger Berman Group, LLC

  1,645,416(5)  5.6%

1290 Avenue of the Americas

        

New York, NY 10104

        
         

Kayne Anderson Rudnick Investment Management LLC

  1,534,878(6)  5.3%

2000 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 1110

        

Los Angeles, CA 90067

        
         

Directors and executive officers of Bancorp and the Bank as a group (18 persons)

  1,101,505(7)  3.7%


 

Amount and NaturePercent of

of BeneficialStock Yards Bancorp

Name Ownerof Beneficial

OwnershipCommon Stock(1)

Kayne Anderson Rudnick Investment Management LLC

1,806,045 (2)

6.8%

1800 Avenue of the Stars

Los Angeles, CA 90067

BlackRock, Inc.

1,728,214 (3)

6.5%

55 East 52nd Street

New York, NY 10055

The Vanguard Group, Inc.

1,506,164 (4)

5.7%

100 Vanguard Boulevard

Malvern, PA 19355

Directors and executive officers of Bancorp and

1,125,138 (5)

4.2%

the Bank as a group (15 persons)


(1)

Shares of Stock Yards Bancorp Common Stock subject to outstanding stock appreciation rights (SARs) that are currently exercisable or may become exercisable within the following 60 days under Stock Yards Bancorps Stock Incentive Plans are deemed outstanding for purposes of computing the percentage of Stock Yards Bancorp Common Stock beneficially owned by the person and group holding such SARs but are not deemed outstanding for purposes of computing the percentage of Stock Yards Bancorp Common Stock beneficially owned by any other person or group.

(2)

Based upon Schedule 13G13G/A filed with the SEC on February 11, 2022.1, 2023.

(3)

Based upon Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 1, 2022.9, 2023.

(4)

Based upon Schedule 13D filed jointly on behalf of each of the reporting persons with the SEC on March 1, 2023. Beneficial ownership information for the reporting persons is presented in the Schedule 13D as of the date of filing and is based upon the number of shares of our Common Stock outstanding as of January 31, 2023. Darrell R. and Margaret C. Wells are the parents of our current director and nominee, Laura L. Wells. We refer you to the section captioned Commonwealth Bancshares Investor Agreement on page 21 of this Proxy Statement for additional information regarding their rights to designate a qualified individual to serve on our Board of Directors, with our agreement.

(5)

Based upon Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 10, 2023.

(6)

Based upon Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 10, 2022.14, 2023.

(5)(7)

Includes 372,800328,690 shares held by directors and executive officers subject to outstanding SARs that are currently exercisable or may become exercisable within the following 60 days, 91,157 shares held in the Directors Deferred Compensation Plan and 101,25293,651 shares held in KSOP accounts.

 

2228

 

The following table shows the beneficial ownership of Stock Yards Bancorp, Inc.’s Common Stock as of December 31, 20212022 by each current director, each nominee for election as director and each individual included as a named executive officer.officer in the Summary Compensation Table appearing on page 51 of this Proxy Statement.

 

 

Name

Number of Shares

Beneficially Owned(1) (2) (3) (4)

Percent of Stock Yards

Bancorp Common

Stock

Shannon B. Arvin

6431,384

            

(5)*

Paul J. Bickel III

28,89030,453

(6)

(5)

*

J. McCauley Brown

15,50316,425

(7)(6)

*

Allison J. Donovan

-

 

(5)

William M. Dishman III

65,163

(8)

(5)*

David P. Heintzman

225,199

(9)206,355

 

(5)

Donna L. Heitzman

12,909

(10)

(5)*

Carl G. Herde

52,88748,683

 

(5)*

James A. Hillebrand

225,739213,998

(11)(7)

(5)*

Richard A. Lechleiter

29,79129,778

(12)(8)

(5)*

Philip S. Poindexter

102,092109,917

(13)(9)

(5)*

Stephen M. Priebe

27,08228,623

 

*

Michael V. Rehm

(5)26,511

*

Edwin S. Saunier

5,5796,668

 

(5)*

John L. Schutte

85,66787,205

(14)(10)

(5)*

T. Clay Stinnett

99,967104,425

(15)(11)

(5)*

Kathy C. Thompson

79,39853,052

 

*

Laura L. Wells

16,244

(5)(12)

*

 

* Less than 1% of outstanding shares of Common Stock

(1)

Includes, where noted, shares in which members of the directors, nominees or executive officers immediate family have a beneficial interest. The column does not, however, include the interest of certain of the listed directors, nominees or executive officers in shares held by other non-dependent family members in their own right. In each case, the principal disclaims beneficial ownership of any such shares, and declares that the listing in this Proxy Statement should not be construed as an admission that the principal is the beneficial owner of any such securities.

(2)

Includes shares subject to outstanding SARs that are currently exercisable or may become exercisable within the following 60 days and unvested restricted shares issued under Stock Yards Bancorps Stock Incentive Plan(s) as follows:

Name

 

Number of
SARs

  

Number of
Unvested Restricted
Stock Grants

 

Arvin

  200   541 

Bickel

  1,000   541 

Brown

  1,500   541 

Donovan

�� -   - 

Heintzman

  50,955   541 

Herde

  -   541 

Hillebrand

  102,132   - 

Lechleiter

  -   541 

Poindexter

  54,926   - 

Priebe

  -   541 

Rehm

  13,672   - 

Saunier

  200   541 

Schutte

  800   541 

Stinnett

  42,746   - 

Thompson

  5,959   - 

Wells

  -   - 

29

(3)

Includes shares subject to outstanding SARs that are currently exercisable or may become exercisable within the following 60 days and unvested restricted shares issued under Stock Yards Bancorps Stock Incentive Plan(s) as follows:

Name

 

Number of
SARs

  

Number of
Unvested Restricted
Stock Grants

 

Arvin

  -   - 

Bickel

  800   862 

Brown

  1,500   862 

Dishman

  32,511   - 

Heintzman

  67,465   862 

Heitzman

  1,000   862 

Herde

  -   862 

Hillebrand

  113,087   - 

Lechleiter

  -   862 

Poindexter

  53,254   - 

Priebe

  1,500   862 

Saunier

  -   - 

Schutte

  600   862 

Stinnett

  46,866   - 

Thompson

  20,498   - 

23

(3)

Includes shares held in Directors Deferred Compensation Plan as follows:

 

  

Number

 

Name

 

of Shares

 

Arvin

  - 

Bickel

  6,9738,657 

Brown

  3,6784,058

Donovan

- 

Heintzman

  - 

Heitzman

6,299

Herde

  22,91024,231 

Hillebrand

  475484 

Lechleiter

  23,03924,363

Poindexter

- 

Priebe

  21,93324,108 

Saunier

  190538 

Schutte

  3,9214,718 

Thompson

  - 

Wells

-

 

(4)

(4)Includes shares held in the Companys KSOP as follows:

Includes shares held in the Companys KSOP as follows:

  

Number

 

Name

 

of Shares

 

Dishman

7,034

Hillebrand

  23,53524,095 

Poindexter

  13,58513,951

Rehm

2,226 

Stinnett

  12,37112,714 

Thompson

  34,84925,348 

 

(5)

Less than one percent of outstanding Stock Yards Bancorp Common Stock.

(6)

Includes 10,500 shares held jointly by Mr. Bickel and his wife.spouse.

(7)(6)

Includes 3,987 shares held by Mr. Browns wife.spouse.

(7)

Includes 343 shares held by Mr. Hillebrands adult children.

(8)

Includes 3,300 shares held by Mr.Dishmans wife.

(9)

Includes 59,070 shares held jointly by Mr.Heintzman and his wife.

(10)

Includes 1,000 shares held jointly by Ms. Heitzman and her husband; and 200 shares held by Ms. Heitzmans husband.

(11)

Includes 11,634 shares held by Michelle L. Hillebrand as to which Mr. Hillebrand exercises voting control.

(12)

Includes 2,1002,500 shares held by Mr. Lechleiters adult children.

(13)(9)

Includes 291 shares held as custodian for Mr. Poindexters children.

(14)(10)

Includes 23,073 shares held jointly by Mr. Schutte and his wifespouse and 2,250 shares held by Mr. Schuttes wife.spouse.

(15)(11)

Includes 448 shares held by Mr. Stinnetts wifespouse and 179183 shares held as custodian for their children.

(12)

Includes 2,420 shares held as custodian for Ms. Wells children.

 


30

 

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION AND OTHER INFORMATION

 

REPORT ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

 

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

 

This compensation discussion and analysis (“CD&A”) describes the philosophy, objectives, process, components, and additional aspects of our 20212022 executive compensation program. This CD&A is intended to be read in conjunction with the tables and related narrative disclosure that immediately follow this section, which provide further historical compensation information for the following named executive officers (“NEOs”):

 

Name 

Position 

James A. Hillebrand

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer (“Chairman/CEO”)

Philip S. Poindexter

President

T. Clay Stinnett

Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”)

Kathy C. Thompson

Senior Executive Vice President and Director of Wealth Management & Trust

William M. Dishman IIIMichael V. Rehm

Executive Vice President and Chief RiskLending Officer

 

CD&A Reference Guide

Executive Summary

Section I

Compensation Philosophy and Objectives

SectionII 

Compensation Philosophy and ObjectivesDetermination Process

Section IIIII 

Components of Our Compensation Determination ProcessProgram

Section IIIIV 

Components of OurAdditional Compensation ProgramPolicies and Practices

Section IVV 

Additional Compensation Policies and Practices

SectionV

 

I. 

EXECUTIVE SUMMARYExecutive Summary

 

Despite incurring significant one-time acquisition costs, 2021 represented the strongest year in our history. Highlights for the year ended December 31, 2021 follow:

Despite incurring significant one-time acquisition costs, 2022 represented the strongest year in our history. Highlights for the year ended December 31, 2022 follow:

 

Completion of the KentuckyCommonwealth Bancshares acquisition, which expanded our presence in Louisville and expansion into Central/Easternneighboring Shelby County and Northern Kentucky significantly

SBA Paycheck Protection Program (“PPP) loan forgiveness activity

 

Record organic loan production

 

Substantial legacy loan and deposit growth (excluding the acquisition and PPP) across all markets

 

ReductionThe Federal Reserve raised interest rates by 425 basis points, which coupled with our loan growth expanded net interest income and net interest margin

Increase in both the allowance for credit loss on loans associated with loan growth and off-balance sheet exposuresdeterioration within the Federal Reserve’s future unemployment rate forecast

 

Record levels of non-interest income

 

Operating expenses remaining well-controlled

 

Pristine credit quality

Publication of our inaugural Environmental, Social and Governance (“ESG”) Corporate Responsibility Report

 

20212022 Select Business Results

 

We have a long-term track record of performing at the top of our peer group on key profitability measures such as return on average assets (“ROAA”) and return on average equity (“ROAE”)., which are common metrics within the banking industry and which allow us to directly compare our performance against similarly-sized and situated banking institutions. In 2022 and 2021, our profitability results were negatively impacted by $18.5 million and $20.7 million of tax effected one-time acquisition costs, respectively, which led to a decline in our performance metrics relative to our compensation peer group. However, calculation methodologies for both short-term and long-term performance metrics exclude one-time acquisition costs.

 

 

Our ROAA for 20212022 totaled 1.33%1.25%, representing a decline from 1.40%1.33% reported in 2020.2021. Compared to the compensation peer compensation group, we ranked slightly above the 50th percentile. However, when adjusted to exclude one-time acquisition costs, ROAA equated to 1.69%1.50%* and well exceeded1.69%* in 2022 and 2021, respectively, and was at or above the 90th percentile for 2021.both periods.

 

Our ROAE of 13.02%12.58% for 2021 ranked in line with2022 was slightly below the 7550th percentile of the compensation peer group and represented a decline from 14.01%13.02% in 2020.2021. When adjusted to exclude one-time acquisition costs, ROAE was significantly in excess of the 9075th percentile for 2021.2022.

 

 

ROAA

  

ROAE

  

ROAA

  

ROAE

 

25th percentile

  1.16

%

  10.56

%

 1.01

%

 10.37

%

50th percentile

  1.32

%

  12.67

%

 1.22

%

 12.70

%

75th percentile

  1.49

%

  13.31

%

 1.38

%

 13.75

%

90th percentile

  1.59

%

  14.45

%

 1.50

%

 16.14

%

Stock Yards Bancorp – Actual

  1.33

%

  13.02

%

  1.25

%

  12.58

%

Stock Yards Bancorp – Adjusted*

  1.69

%

  16.63

%

  1.50

%

  15.09

%

 

Financial Results

 

Net income increased 27%25% to $93.0 million, or $3.21 per diluted share, in 2022 compared to $74.6 million, or $2.97 per diluted share, in 2021 compared to $58.9 million, or $2.59 per diluted share, in the prior year. Despite incurring $20.7$18.5 million in tax effected one-time acquisition costs, 20212022 represented the strongest year in our history. Excluding one-time acquisition costs, net income would have increased 62%17% to $95.3$111.5 million*, or $3.79*$3.86* per diluted share year over year. Our reported annual diluted EPS has trended as follows over the past five years.

 

a09.jpg

image09.jpg

 

* Adjusted for one-time acquisition costs. This result represents a non-GAAP financial measure. See Appendix A for a reconciliation of GAAP and non-GAAP financial measures.

 

Operating Results

 

● 

Record loan production excluding PPP loans,(excluding PPP) drove $291$529 million of legacy portfolio growth and, combined with expansion into the Central Kentucky market,new markets, led to record total loans of $4.17$5.21 billion at December 31, 20212022

● 

● Asset and credit quality remained strong, among the highest relative to our peers

Asset and credit quality remained strong, among the highest relative to our peers

26

● 

Total revenue, comprising fully tax equivalenttax-equivalent net interest income and non-interest income, of $237.4$323.4 million, surpassed the previous record of $188.0$237.4 million in 20202021

 

image10.jpg

 

20212022 Shareholder Return

 

1-year total shareholder return (“TSR”): 61%4%; 3-year TSR: 111%70%; and 5-year TSR: 55%95%

Substantial and sustained dividend payout ratio; rate raised 1415 times since 20132012

● 

In early 2021, announced the pending acquisition of Kentucky Bancshares, Inc., which closed in 2021.

In August 2021, announcedCompleted the pending acquisition of Commonwealth Bancshares Inc., which closed onin March 7, 2022.2022

 

a11.jpg

image11.jpg

 


 

Performance Orientation of 20212022 Compensation

 

Chairman/CEO Compensation Majority Performance-Based (Equity and Total). The Compensation Committee (the “Committee”) of our Board of Directors is responsible for the design and administration of our executive compensation program. The Committee’s philosophy is to place at risk a significant portion of executive officers’ total compensation, making it contingent on Company performance while remaining consistent with our risk management policies. As such, the Committee has structured the majority of the compensation of the Chairman/CEO as variable, at-risk and subject to the achievement of performance goals in order to be earned. Approximately 52% of the Chairman/CEO’s grant date target total direct compensation, consisting of base salary, short-term incentive opportunity and long-term incentive opportunity, was variable, at-risk and performance-based. Seventy-five percent of the long-term incentive equity grants were performance-based and were in the form of performance share units (“PSUs”). These PSUs are subject to three-year performance metrics tied to our key operating goals and will vest at the end of a three-year performance period, subject to a mandatory one-year post-vesting holding period. The other 25% were in the form of time-based stock appreciation rights (“SARs”) that vest over five years.

 

Long-Term Incentives: 75% PSUs, 25% SARs; Three-Year Performance Period; High ThresholdTarget Performance Level. For the long-term incentive equity grants to executive officers, the Committee utilized PSUs to motivate operational achievement and link pay to performance, and SARs to motivate stock price appreciation over the long term, because they deliver value only if the stock price increases. For the grants in the form of PSUs, the Committee maintained three-year goals at the outset of the performance period for relative ROAA (85th percentile is target performance, representing a rigorous and challenging level of achievement) and cumulative EPS, the target for which reflects a solid growth rate.

 

Key 20212022 Executive Compensation Decisions and Outcomes

 

In connection with determining 20212022 executive compensation, the Committee reviewed its criteria, in part because of pending acquisitions by the Company’s having fallen to the 41st percentile by revenue of the existing peer group.Company. As part of this review, the Committee determined to maintain its key criteria but change some of the size ranges, which led to the removal of fourseven companies and the addition of ten companies. As a result, the Company moved closer to the median for annual revenue and assets. In 2021,2022, we had strong fundamental performance, outperformed our peers, and took prudent compensation action to balance shareholder experience, GAAP performance, core performance, future expectations and executive interests.

 

Base Salaries. The Committee reviewed our NEO’sNEOs’ base salaries, determined that those salaries remained appropriatelagged the peer median in part because of its decision not to increase NEOs’ base salaries for 2021, and thus did not make any adjustments toapproved base salary for 2021 after an assessment of economic conditions present at the time when base salaries are normally reviewed by the Committee.   increases as discussed further on page 42.

 

Annual Cash Incentives. The Committee returned to using pre-pandemic performance metrics and undertook a rigorous process to set the performance targets for 2021.2022. Annual cash incentive opportunities for fourthree of our NEOs, Messrs. Hillebrand, Poindexter Stinnett and Dishman,Stinnett, are tied exclusively to corporate profitability, as measured by EPS. Ms. Thompson’s and Mr. Rehm’s short-term incentive plan incorporatesplans incorporate goals related to hertheir line of business responsibilities as well as Company-wide profitability.

 

Messrs. Hillebrand, Poindexter, Stinnett and DishmanStinnett

 

The primary performance metric utilized for Messrs. Hillebrand, Poindexter, and Stinnett and Dishman was budgetdiluted EPS. The target performance goal for 20212022 was set 6.2%25% higher than the 2020 actual EPS.2021 EPS target.

 

The EPS metric hadmaintained a performance threshold of 94% of target and a performance maximum of 107% of target. The Committee uses EPS because it believes EPS drives long-term shareholder return, as it represents the culmination of executive officers’ efforts regarding profitability, revenue growth, expense control, risk profile and other elements.

 

The target annual incentive plan opportunities of each of Messrs. Hillebrand, Poindexter, Stinnett and DishmanStinnett were denominated as a percentage of base salary and ranged from 30%35% to 50% of base salary. Payouts were capped at 200% of the target payout.

28

 

Company-wide performance accounted for 100% of the annual incentive plan opportunity for Messrs. Hillebrand, Poindexter, Stinnett and Dishman;Stinnett; there was no allocation to individual performance goals. All of our eligible NEOs participate in the annual incentive plan on the same terms, other than the target percentage of base salary, andsalary. Ms. Thompson hasand Mr. Rehm have additional components relating to her areatheir respective areas of responsibility.

 

As described above, GAAP EPS increased 15%8% to $2.97$3.21 per diluted share, driven by the Kentucky BancsharesCommonwealth acquisition, PPP loan forgiveness activity, reduction in both the allowance for credit loss on loans and off-balance sheet exposures, substantial organic loangrowth and deposit growth (excluding acquisition and PPP) and historic levels of excess liquidity. Excluding one-time acquisition costs, net income would have increased 62% to $95.3 million*, or $3.79* per diluted share year over year.record non-interest income. This EPS result led to short-term incentive payouts to Messrs. Hillebrand, Poindexter, Stinnett and DishmanStinnett at 200% of target.

* Adjusted for one-time acquisition costs. This result represents a non-GAAP financial measure. See Appendix A for a reconciliation of GAAP and non-GAAP financial measures.

 

Ms. Thompson

 

Ms. Thompson’s short-term incentive includes three components: income before overhead allocations and taxes, consolidated EPS of the Company, and net new business. Ms. Thompson’s incentive is weighted 75% for her line of business and 25% for overall Company performance, and the Committee considers her line of business goals to be appropriately challenging to attain. Financial results drove theMs. Thompson’s short-term incentive payout for 2022 was 125% of target.

Mr. Rehm

Mr. Rehm’s short-term incentive includes two components: production (& other) goals and consolidated EPS of the Company. Mr. Rehm’s incentive is weighted 75% for his line of business and 25% for overall Company performance, and the Committee considers his line of business goals to Ms. Thompson at 200%be appropriately challenging to attain. Mr. Rehm’s short-term incentive payout for 2022 was 191% of target.

 

Long-Term Incentive Equity. As in 2020,2021, the Company’s 20212022 long-term incentives consisted of 75% PSUs (by grant date value) that vest based on performance over a three-year measurement period, and 25% SARs that vest over five years. No pandemic-related changes were implemented to our long-term incentive awards granted in 20212022 or prior years.

 

The performance metrics for the PSUs, which are weighted 50% each, are three-year relative ROAA, with the target set at the 85th percentile and the threshold set at the 80th percentile of the peer group, a very challenging relative level of performance; and three-year cumulative EPS, a true long-term performance period using a metric viewed as central to increasing long-term shareholder value.

 

PSUs granted in 20192020 vested as of December 31, 20212022, and will be certified and distributed by March 31, 2022.2023. Based on our aggregate EPS for the three-year performance period 2019-20212020-2022 and preliminary data indicating that our average adjusted ROAA for the three-year performance period of 1.53%* exceeded the 90th percentile of the comparator group, we expect that recipients will be awarded grants on the EPS and ROAA portionsportion at the maximum performance levels.level and the ROAA portion at the maximum performance level.

 

* Adjusted for one-time acquisition costs. This result represents a non-GAAP financial measure. See Appendix A for a reconciliation of GAAP and non-GAAP financial measures.

Connecting Pay and Performance

 

Our record of consistently higher long-term financial performance has in turn driven our long-term shareholder returns and key financial metrics to impressive levels relative to our peers. Consistent with our pay-for-performance philosophy, a substantial portion of annual target total direct compensation is variable, at-risk pay. We consider compensation to be “at risk” and performance-based if it is subject to operating performance or if its value depends on stock price appreciation.

 

The following charts demonstrate the positioning of our ROAA and ROAE compared to the peer group described on page 3339 over each of the last five years. As shown below, our ROAAROAE and ROAEROAA have consistently ranked in the top 10%25% of our peer group until 20202020. Our 2021 and 2021. In 2021, our2022 profitability results were negatively impacted by $20.7one-time expenses related to the acquisitions of Kentucky Bancshares ($20.7 million net of tax effected one-time acquisition costs, which led to a decline in our performance metrics relative to our compensation peer group. However, calculation methodologies for both short-termtax) and long-term performance metrics exclude one-time acquisition costs.

Commonwealth Bancshares ($18.5 million net of tax). Even with that slight decline in profitability, our average ROAA over that five-year period was inat the 9390rdth percentile of our peer group, and our average ROAE over that period was higher than that of anyat the 96th percentile of our peers.peer group.

image12.jpg

 

a12.jpg

 

The following chart compares our five-year total shareholder return (TSR) to the median TSR of our compensation peer group and an additional industry peer group.

 

a13.jpg

image13.jpg

 

Source: S&P Global Market Intelligence. Market pricing data as of December 31, 2021.2022.

 

(1)

TSR equals the return of a security over a period, including price appreciation and the reinvestment of dividends. Dividends are assumed to be reinvested at the closing price of the security on the ex-date of the dividend.

(2) 

TSR equals the return ofSee page 39 for a security over a period, including price appreciation and the reinvestment of dividends. Dividends are assumed to be reinvested at the closing pricelisting of the security on the ex-date of the dividend.compensation peer group. 

(2)(3)

Nationwide peers representing 16270 major exchange-traded banks (NASDAQ, NYSE and NYSEAM) headquartered in the U.S. with total assets between $1.5$6 and $7$16 billion.

(3)

See page 33 for a listing of the compensation peer group. Excludes two banks in the original peer group that were acquired.

 

The Committee believes stock price closely mirrors earnings growth over the long-term, and management should be incentedincentivized with respect to performance measures related to the operations of the Company. Over the short term, stock price is not controllable by management and should not be a tool to judge management’s performance. We believe our EPS growth aligns management’s interests with shareholders and thus having EPS as a common focus in the Company’s annual and long-term incentive programs is in the best interest of shareholders. While the annual and long-term incentive programs use different EPS goals, together the programs drive shareholder value creation over time.

 

30

Additionally, the Committee believes that it uses appropriately challenging targets in setting goals for both short-term and long-term incentives, and that the Company’s financial results must significantly exceed peer median performance in order to achieve target-level awards. For example,Payouts for the EPS component under our short-term incentive programs require a minimum threshold of diluted EPS in order for bonuses to be earned. Under the Company’s performance share goals, executives do not achieve target award vesting for the ROAA component of our PSU program unless our ROAA exceeds the 85th percentile of our comparator group (which is comprised of all publicly-tradedpublicly traded banks with $1.5$6.0 to $7.0$16.0 billion in assets), and no awards are earned if our ROAA does not exceed the 80th percentile of our comparator group.

 

Say-on-Pay Results

 

At the 20212022 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, 98.2%98% of the votes were cast in favor of the advisory vote to approve executive compensation, commonly known as “say-on-pay.” This vote is consistent with recent vote results. The Committee believes its compensation practices are properly aligned with the interests of shareholders, and that the high level of shareholder support of our 20212022 say-on-pay proposal indicates that most shareholders share the Committee’s view.

 

Compensation Program Governance

 

The Committee continually reviews its policies and procedures to ensure they are consistent with strong corporate governance guidelines. This also includes education around governance best practices and their bearing on the Company and its executive compensation program.

 

What We Do: 

 

What We Dont Do: 

Align pay and performance

 

No guaranteed bonuses – incentive compensation may be reduced to zero if financial metrics are not met

Engage an independent third-party compensation consultant for advice in making compensation decisions

 

No highly leveraged incentive plans that encourage excessive risk taking

Review compensation data from peers whose industry, revenues, and footprint share similarities with the Company

 

No uncapped incentive award payouts

Conduct an annual shareholder say-on-pay vote

 

No excessive perquisites for our directors and executive officers

Maintain additional holding requirements of one year once equity awards vest

 

No payment of dividends on unvested equity awards

Maintain stock ownership guidelines for executive officers and directors

 

No repricing of options or SARs without prior shareholder approval

Maintain a claw backclawback policy

 

No excise tax gross ups

 

II. 

Compensation Philosophy and Objectives

 

Our compensation philosophy guides the design and decisions of our compensation program to achieve the following objectives:

 

 

● 

To attract, retain, and motivate top executive talent;

 

● 

To link overall compensation to company performance;

 

● 

To align executive interests with shareholder interests;

31

 

● 

To place a significant portion of total compensation “atat risk, making it contingent on Company performance while remaining consistent with our risk management policies; and

 

● 

To support the Company’s objective of creating shareholder value without taking unnecessary risks.

 

The Committee believes that the Company’s pay policies and practices do not create risks reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company.

 

III.

Compensation Determination Process

 

Role of the Compensation Committee

 

The Committee assists our Board in establishing our compensation philosophy and determining the compensation of our executive officers. The Committee is also responsible for determining the structure and components of our programs, as well as reviewing and approving the compensation of the NEOs, or recommending it for approval by the Board of Directors. The Committee is responsible for annually assessing the performance of the executive officers, including the NEOs, and for determining their annual salary, incentive (short- and long-term) compensation goals and payout/grant levels. Each of the four members of our Committee is independent as is defined under NASDAQ listing standards.

 

The Committee held seven meetings during 2021,2022, and its actions included finalizing all aspects of 20212022 executive compensation. The Committee in 2021,2022, among other items:

 

 

● 

Reviewed its compensation philosophy

● 

Conducted an annual performance evaluation of our CEO

 

● 

Conducted an annual performance evaluation of our CEO

 

 

● 

Reviewed the Committee charter

 

● 

Reviewed the Company’s 20212022 operating budget and its effect on incentive compensation programs for 20212022 (including setting the EPS benchmarks for short-term compensation payouts excluding one-time acquisition costs)merger expenses)

 

● 

Established the performance-based metrics and targets for the annual incentive plans

 

● 

Established the design, award mix and performance goals for the long-term incentive plan

 

● 

Evaluated achievement relative to performance targets, and determined and certified corresponding incentive payouts

 

Reviewed and approved a peer group for use in compensation studies

 

● 

Reviewed the stock ownership guidelines for our executive officers

 

● 

Discussed executive succession planning

 

● 

Reviewed the Company-wide retirement plan programs, and

 

● 

Received education on compensation trends, compliance issues and best practices from the Committee’s compensation consultants, Aon.McLagan.

 

Ultimately, the Committee’s decisions are based on a variety of factors, including short- and long-term Company performance, the officer’s level of responsibility, an assessment of individual performance, and competitive market data.

 

32

Role of Executives in Compensation Committee Deliberations

 

The Committee works closely with the CEO, and the CEO attends Committee meetings to discuss the Company’s compensation and performance matters, particularly as it relates to the other executive officers. For each executive officer other than himself, the CEO presents annual evaluations of such officers and makes recommendations to the Committee regarding their compensation. This assessment considers such factors as our achievement of goals related to corporate, division, function, and individual performance. Our CEO does not play any role with respect to any matter affecting his own compensation and is not present when the Committee discusses and formulates its compensation recommendation for the CEO. The Committee reviews recommendations made by its CEO and information from the executive compensation consultant review. The Committee sets the compensation for our CEO and each of our NEOs at its meetings in the first quarter of each year and subsequently reports its compensation decisions to the full Board of Directors.

 

The general counsel of the Company works with the Committee Chair to provide administrative support and, along with other executives, provide pertinent financial, tax, accounting, or operational information. Other executives, such as those from human resources or finance, may attend meetings from time-to-time to provide their insights and suggestions on pertinent topics. Only Committee members may vote on decisions regarding executive compensation. The Committee regularly conducts a portion of its business in executive session.

 

Role of the Compensation Consultant

 

The Committee views it as important to obtain objective, independent expertise and advice in carrying out its responsibilities, and has the power to retain an independent compensation consultant to assist it in the performance of its duties and responsibilities. The Committee has retained an independent executive compensation consultant to assist in evaluating the compensation practices at the Company and to provide advice and ongoing recommendations regarding executive compensation consistent with our business goals and pay philosophy.

 

In 2021,2022, the Committee continued to engage Aon’sMcLagan, which is part of the Human Capital Solutions practice (also known as McLagan), a division ofat Aon plc, to provide executive compensation consulting services regarding our compensation programs and pay levels. The scope of Aon’sMcLagan’s executive compensation consulting assignment included the ongoing evaluation of the appropriateness of our peer group of banks as well as a comparison of management’s base salaries, annual cash incentive awards and equity-based compensation to those paid by the banks in the peer bank group. The Committee used data developed by AonMcLagan among the various factors that informed its determination of executive officer pay. While the Committee takes into consideration the review and recommendations of AonMcLagan when making decisions about our executive compensation program, ultimately, the Committee makes its own independent decisions about compensation matters.

 

Aon

McLagan reports directly to and performed services solely on behalf of the Committee and has no other relationship with the Company or its management. The Committee has assessed the independence of AonMcLagan consistent with SEC rules and NASDAQ listing standards and has concluded that Aon’sMcLagan’s work did not involve any conflicts of interest.

 

Peer Selection Process

 

Each year, the Committee re-evaluates and updates the peer group, with the consultant’s guidance, to ensure ongoing relevance. The Committee uses this information for making compensation decisions, such as changes to base salaries, annual cash incentive awards, and long-term equity awards.

 

For 20212022 compensation, the Committee worked with the consultant in 20202021 to select peer banks using the following criteria as of March 31, 2020.2021. The chosen criteria were essentially consistent with the prior year and taketook into consideration the Company’s size given the possibility of future acquisitions and growth in certain criteria:

 

 

● 

LocatedNon-thrift institutions located in the continental United States excluding California;

 

● 

Total revenue from $110$190 to $500$550 million;

33

 

● 

Total assets less than $10$16 billion;

 

● 

Insider ownership less than 35% with no single holder owning more than 15%;

 

Publicly traded for at least one calendar year;

 

● 

Non-interest income greater than 15% of total revenue;

 

● 

Market capitalization greater than $275 million;

 

Located in markets with populations greater than 100,000;

 

● 

Non-performing assets / total assets less than 3.0%; and

 

● 

Return on average assets greater than 0.5%.

 

Based on these criteria as well as acquisitions, the Committee removed fourseven companies from the peer group used for 20212022 compensation decisions: CarolinaBoston Private Financial, Corporation, HomeTrust Bancshares Inc.Bryn Mawr Bank Corp., Old SecondCambridge Bancorp, Farmers National Banc Corp., First Financial Corp., Hills Bancorp, and United Community Financial. TenMercantile Bank Corp. Eleven new companies met the criteria and were added to the peer group.


 

The table below lists the peer banks approved by the Compensation Committee for 20212022 compensation decisions, with the newly added peer companies shown in italics:

Boston Private Financial

Mercantile Bank Corporation

Bryn Mawr Bank Corporation

MidWestOne Financial Group Inc.

CambridgeAmerant Bancorp

National Bank Holdings Corporation

Capital City Bank Group Inc.

Nicolet Bankshares Inc.

Capital City Bank Group Inc.

Park National Corp.

City Holding CompanyCo.

Park National CorporationPeapack-Gladstone Financial

Enterprise Financial Services Corporation

Peapack-Gladstone Financial Corporation

Farmers National Banc Corporation

QCR Holdings Inc

First Busey Corp.

Sandy Spring Bancorp Inc.

First Financial Bankshares

Seacoast Banking Corp. of FL

First Busey CorporationMerchants Corp.

Seacoast Banking Corporation of FloridaSouth Plains Financial Inc.

First Financial BanksharesGreat Southern Bancorp Inc.

Southside Bancshares Inc.

First Financial CorporationHomeStreet Inc.

Univest Corporation of PennsylvaniaThe First Bancshares

HillsHorizon Bancorp Inc.

Tompkins Financial Corp.

Independent Bank Corp.

Univest Financial Corp.

International Bancshares Corp.

Veritex Holdings Inc.

MidWestOne Financial Group Inc.

Washington Trust Bancorp Inc.

IndependentNational Bank CorporationHoldings Corp.

 

            Our total revenue, asset size, net income and market capitalization and that of the peer group established for 2021 compensation decisions, using the March 31st, 2020 data considered by the Committee when establishing the peer group, are set forth in the following table:   

Peer Bank Name, Ticker, State

 

Total

Revenue

  

Total Assets

  

Net Income

  

Market

Capitalization

 
  

Dollars in millions

 

Boston Private Financial (BPFH) MA

 $325  $8,746  $97  $585 

Bryn Mawr Bank Corporation (BMTC) PA

  227   4,923   81   565 

Cambridge Bancorp (CATC) MA

  122   2,853   37   282 

Capital City Bank Group Inc. (CCBG) FL

  160   3,087   56   338 

City Holding Company (CHCO) WV

  248   5,088   68   1,074 

Enterprise Financial Services Corporation (EFSC) MO

  303   7,501   53   730 

Farmers National Banc Corporation (FMNB) OH

  115   2,668   30   327 

First Busey Corporation (BUSE) IL

  406   9,721   116   931 

First Financial Bankshares (FFIN) TX

  413   9,701   110   3,820 

First Financial Corporation (THFF) IN

  179   4,062   40   462 

Hills Bancorp (HBIA) IA

  124   3,366   26   609 

Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) MI

  171   3,632   49   282 

Mercantile Bank Corporation (MBWM) MI

  151   3,657   25   343 

MidWestOne Financial Group Inc. (MOFG) IA

  191   4,764   35   337 

National Bank Holdings Corporation (NBHC) CO

  294   6,028   89   731 

Nicolet Bankshares, Inc. (NCBS) WI

  174   3,733   46   569 

Park National Corporation (PRK) OH

  405   8,719   96   1,265 

Peapack-Gladstone Financial Corporation (PGC) NJ

  179   5,831   57   338 

QCR Holdings, Inc. (QCRH) IL

  238   5,232   70   427 

Seacoast Banking Corporation of Florida (SBCF) FL

  305   7,353   56   965 

Southside Bancshares, Inc. (SBSI) TX

  222   7,274   42   1,003 

Univest Corporation of Pennsylvania (UVSP) PA

  238   5,465   66   476 

Washington Trust Bancorp, Inc. (WASH) RI

  203   5,621   72   632 

Median

 $222  $5,232  $56  $569 

Stock Yards Bancorp, Inc.

 $179  $3,785  $51  $656 

 

Our total revenue, asset size, net income and market capitalization and that of the peer group established for 2022 compensation decisions, using the March 31, 2021 data considered by the Committee when establishing the peer group, are set forth in the following table:

Peer Bank Name (Ticker) State

 

Total

Revenue

  

Total Assets

  

Market

Capitalization

 
  

Dollars in Millions

 

Amerant Bancorp Inc. (AMTB) FL

  254   7,751   704 

Capital City Bank Group Inc. (CCBG) FL

  226   3,930   438 

City Holding Company (CHCO) WV

  218   5,894   1,286 

Enterprise Financial Services Corp. (EFSC) MO

  338   10,191   1,545 

First Busey Corp. (BUSE) IL

  401   10,760   1,394 

First Financial Bankshares (FFIN) TX

  504   12,103   6,649 

First Merchants Corp. (FRME) IN

  493   14,629   2,509 

Great Southern Bancorp Inc. (GSBC) MO

  214   5,604   776 

HomeStreet Inc. (HMST) WA

  373   7,265   941 

Horizon Bancorp Inc. (HNBC) IN

  234   6,056   817 

Independent Bank Corp. (IBCP) MI

  220   4,426   515 

International Bancshares Corp. (IBOC) TX

  528   14,922   2,941 

MidWestOne Financial Group Inc. (MOFG) IA

  194   5,737   495 

National Bank Holdings Corp. (NBHC) CO

  338   6,950   1,225 

Nicolet Bankshares, Inc. (NCBS) WI

  202   4,544   835 

Park National Corp. (PRK) OH

  468   9,914   2,112 

Peapack-Gladstone Financial Corporation (PGC) NJ

  193   5,970   588 

QCR Holdings, Inc. (QCRH) IL

  293   5,645   748 

Sandy Spring Bancorp (SASR) MD

  517   12,873   2,049 

Seacoast Banking Corp. of Florida (SBCF) FL

  331   8,812   2,004 

South Plains Financial Inc. (SPFI) TX

  231   3,733   410 

Southside Bancshares, Inc. (SBSI) TX

  237   6,999   1,258 

The First Bancshares (FBMS) MS

  203   5,443   769 

Tompkins Financial Corp. (TMP) NY

  302   8,095   1,233 

Univest Corp. of Pennsylvania (UVSP) PA

  261   6,417   840 

Veritex Holdings Inc. (VBTX) TX

  318   9,238   1,617 

Washington Trust Bancorp, Inc. (WASH) RI

  233   5,719   894 

Median

  261   6,950   941 

Stock Yards Bancorp, Inc.

  247   5,995   1,163 

 

Referencing the Competitive Market in Determining 20212022 Compensation

 

The Committee considers a number ofseveral factors in determining appropriate pay levels and plan designs for our NEOs. These factors include competitive compensation data from peer companies and the banking market in general. The Committee does not view competitive market prescriptively or tie the compensation levels of our executives to specific market percentiles. Instead, the Committee applies judgment and discretion in establishing targeted pay levels, considering not only competitive market data, but also factors such as company, business unit and individual performance, scope of responsibility, internal pay equity, skill sets, leadership potential and succession planning.

 

Mix of Pay

 

We believe that our executive compensation program strikes an appropriate balance between fixed and variable pay as well as between short and long-term pay. The following charts for our CEO and our other NEOs illustrate the target compensation established in early 2021,2022, consisting of base salary, annual incentive awards, and long-term equity-based compensation granted in 2021.2022.

 

a14.jpg

 

Name

 

Salary

  

Target Bonus %

  

Target Bonus

  

PSUs

  

SARs

  

Total

 

Hillebrand

 $560,000   50% $280,000  $252,000  $84,000  $1,176,000 

Poindexter

  396,000   40%  158,400   142,560   47,520   744,480 

Thompson

  364,000   35%  127,400   114,660   38,220   644,280 

Stinnett

  317,000   35%  110,950   99,855   33,285   561,090 

Dishman

  289,000   30%  86,700   78,030   26,010   479,740 

image14.jpg

Name

 

Salary

  

Target Bonus

%

  

Target

Bonus

  

PSUs

  

SARs

  

Total

 

Hillebrand

 $710,000   50% $355,000  $319,500  $106,500  $1,491,000 

Poindexter

  465,000   40%  186,000   167,400   55,800   874,200 

Stinnett

  400,000   35%  140,000   126,000   42,000   708,000 

Thompson

  385,000   35%  134,750   121,275   40,425   681,450 

Rehm

  335,000   35%  117,250   105,525   35,175   592,950 

 

As demonstrated above, variable pay at target for the CEO represents 52% of direct compensation. However, when the BankCompany performs at maximum, payouts for variable pay significantly increase commensurate with that outperformance.

 

Each compensation element is discussed in more detail below and outlined in more detail in the 20212022 Summary Compensation Table and 20212022 Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table appearing on pages 4351 and 4552 of this Proxy Statement.proxy statement.

 


 

IV. 

Components of Our Compensation Program

Compensation

Component

 

Purpose

 

Link to Performance

 

Fixed or

Performance


Based

 

Short

or


Long-term

Base Salarysalary

 

Provide stable compensation and attract and retain executives through market competitive payments

 

Based on each executive's performance and responsibilities. Used as a basis for short and long-term incentive award goals

 

Fixed

 

Short-term

 Compensation

Component

 

Purpose

 

Link to Performance

 

Fixed or
Performance
Based

 

Short
or
Long-term

Cash Incentivesincentives

 

Incentivize and reward executives for achievement of certain annual financial goals

 

Incentives are 100% quantitative to goals important for near term financial success. Includes a measurement of our corporate performance for all executives, as well as business line performance for certain executives

 

Performance

 

Short-term

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Performance Stock Unitsstock units

 

Reward executives for sustained long-term performance while aligning the value of awards with the success of our shareholders

 

Awards vest based on achievement of three-year goals on EPS growth and ROAA versus peers. Three-year performance period plus an additional one-year mandatory holding period on vested awards

 

Performance

 

Long-term

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Stock Appreciation Rightsappreciation rights

 

Align interests of executives with shareholders by rewarding increases in our stock price

 

Awards only have value if stock price increases. Awards vest ratably over five years

 

Performance

 

Long-term

 

Base Salary

 

We provide a base salary as the fundamental element of executive compensation. In addition, salaries are the basis from which incentives and other select benefits are derived.

 

In support of our focus to attract and retain top talent, our philosophy is to pay base salaries that are within a competitive range of market practice. Individual pay will vary within the range depending on each executive’s position, performance, experience, and contribution. After reviewing the growth in the Company’s size, the competitive marketplace, current economic conditions and the individual pay factors, the Committee determined that our executives’ base salaries remained appropriate,were below market, in part because of the Committee’s decision not to increase base salaries for any NEOs in 2021. Accordingly, the Committee determined that, to bring our executives’ base salaries closer to range of market median for their roles, base salaries for our NEOs would be increased as follows for 2022. Mr. Rehm was not an NEO in 2021 and therefore none of our executives received an increasebecame one in base salary for 2021.2022.

 

Executive

 

2021

Base Salary

  

2020

Base Salary

  

Increase/Decrease

  

2022

Base Salary

 

2021

Base Salary

 

Increase

 

Hillebrand

 $560,000  $560,000   0% $710,000  $560,000  27%

Poindexter

  396,000   396,000   0% 465,000  396,000  17%

Stinnett

 400,000  317,000  26%

Thompson

  364,000   364,000   0% 385,000  364,000  6%

Stinnett

  317,000   317,000   0%

Dishman

  289,000   289,000   0%

Rehm

 335,000  277,000  21%

 

 

Short-Term Cash Incentives

 

The objective of annual cash incentive compensation is to deliver variable compensation that is conditioned on the attainment of certain financial, departmental and/or operating results of the Company. Therefore, the Committee established an incentive program based upon the achievement of certainan EPS goalsgoal as well as line of business goals applicable to specific officers’ duties and employs a rigorous process to set the performance targets.

 

As anticipated, theThe Committee returned to using the EPS measurement of budgetused diluted EPS in 2021. This change was made after we temporarily changed from our historical design2022, as it had done in 2020 in response to the pandemic.2021.

 

Messrs. Hillebrand, Poindexter Stinnett and DishmanStinnett

 

For 2021,2022, the determination as to whether cash incentives would be paid to Messrs. Hillebrand, Poindexter Stinnett and DishmanStinnett was based solely upon the achievement of diluted EPS objectives as set forth below.

 

The Committee strongly supports the use of EPS exclusively in determining short-term cash incentives for certain executives without specific line of business oversight. The Committee believes that EPS, over the long-term, drives TSR as it represents the culmination of executive officers’ efforts regarding profitability, revenue growth, expense control, risk profile and other elements. Oftentimes, boards use several goals to focus management on specific operational objectives while also balancing credit quality and other risks. With virtually all areas of the Company operating at high performance levels and operating ratios at superior levels, growth in EPS should be, and is, the primary focus of the management team. Establishing the appropriate mix of revenue growth, expense control measures, risk profile and other tactics are areas that management has control over and that should result in higher EPS over time. Therefore, the Committee believes aligning pay with EPS growthperformance gives management the appropriate incentive to make the best decisions.

 

The annual cash incentive formula includes increasingly higher payout percentages for corresponding higher adjusteddiluted EPS levels, further reinforcing the Committee’s pay-for-performance philosophy. For purposes of the short-term cash incentive plan, “EPS” is defined as diluted earnings per share of the Company as determined for financial reporting purposes, excluding any acquisition costs and restructuring adjustments made to EPS as a result of a business combination that occurs during the performance period. EPS targets year-over-year EPS growth rates and corresponding bonus percentages for 20212022 were as follows:

 

      

Bonus as a Percentage of Base Salary

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Bonus as a Percentage of Base Salary

      
 

Budget EPS ($)

 

EPS
Growth
2021/2020

 

Mr.

Hillebrand

 

Mr.
Poindexter

 

Mr.

Stinnett

 

Mr.
Dishman

 

EPS ($)

 

Mr.

Hillebrand

 

Mr.
Poindexter

 

Mr.

Stinnett

 

Threshold

 

2.59

 

 

0.0

%

 

10

%

 

8

%

 

7

%

 

6

%

 3.24   10

%

 8

%

 7

%

Target

 

2.75

 

 

6.2

%

 

50

%

 

40

%

 

35

%

 

30

%

 3.44   50

%

 40

%

 35

%

Maximum

 

2.95

or greater

 

13.9

%

 

100

%

 

80

%

 

70

%

 

60

%

 3.69 

or greater

 100

%

 80

%

 70

%

Actual Results

 

3.79

 *

 

46.3

% *

 

100

%

 

80

%

 

70

%

 

60

 3.86*  100

%

 80

%

 70

%

 

* Adjusted for one-time acquisition costs. This result represents a non-GAAP financial measure. See Appendix A for a reconciliation of GAAP and non-GAAP financial measures.

 

The Committee set the target at a level that it considered rigorous and challenging and took into accountconsidered the relevant risks and opportunities. More specifically, the Committee reviewed the relevant financial objectives set as a resultbecause of the detailed budgeting process, and assessed various factors related to the achievability of these budget targets, including the risks associated with various macroeconomic factors and the risks of achieving specific actions that underlie the targets and the implied performance relative to prior years. Considering these factors, the Committee set the 20212022 target performance level for the budgetdiluted EPS goal at $2.75,$3.44, which is 6.2%below the 2021 actual adjusted EPS of $3.79. The 2022 target was set 25% above the 20202021 target of $2.75. The Committee determined that setting the 2022 target above 2021 was not practical, as the 2021 actual adjusted EPS was significantly impacted by one-time factors including the acquisition of $2.59.Kentucky Bancshares, SBA Paycheck Protection Program forgiveness activity, reductions in both the allowance for credit losses on loans and the allowance for credit losses on off-balance sheet exposures, and historic levels of excess liquidity.

 

 

Ms. Thompson

 

Ms. Thompson’s short-term incentive includes three components: net new business, income before overhead allocations and taxes, and consolidated EPS of the Company. The Committee believes it is important for Ms. Thompson to have both line of business and overall bank performance components to her short-term incentive plan as growth in departmental profitability directly affects the profitability of the Company and significantly enhances shareholder value. As a result, the Committee believes Ms. Thompson should be partly measured on the overall success of the Company. Ms. Thompson’s incentive is weighted 75% for her line of business and 25% for overall Company performance, and the Compensation Committee considers her line of business goals to be appropriately challenging to attain. The matrix used to compute the incentive award, shown below, is structured such that achievement of target performance in all categories results in a cash incentive equal to 35% of base salary. The Committee established a hurdle for adjusted EPS of $3.23 for Ms. Thompson to receive any short-term incentive award, including from her line of business component. Ms. Thompson would not have received any short-term incentive award had adjusted EPS been $3.22 or lower. Because the Company’s actual adjusted EPS in 2022 exceeded this hurdle, Ms. Thompson was eligible to receive a short-term incentive award. Respective targets and corresponding bonus percentages for Ms. Thompson’s equally weighted line of business components are as follows:

 

Line of Business Component

 

 

Net New Business

 

Income Before Overhead Allocation and Taxes

 

Net New Business

  

Income Before Overhead Allocation and Taxes

 

 

Net New

Business ($)

 

Bonus as

Percentage

of

Base Salary

 

Percentage

Increase over

Prior Year

 

Bonus as

Percentage

of Base

Salary

 

Net New

Business ($)

  

Bonus as

Percentage

of

Base Salary

  

Percentage

Increase over

Prior Year

  

Bonus as

Percentage

of Base

Salary

 

Threshold

 

700,000

 

 

2.625

%

 

7.7

%

 

2.625

%

 975,000  2.625

%

 5.0

%

 2.625

%

Target

 

900,000

 

 

13.125

%

 

12.2

%

 

13.125

%

 1,175,000  13.125

%

 8.0

%

 13.125

%

Maximum

 

1,150,000

 

 

26.25

%

 

16.7

%

 

26.25

%

 1,425,000  26.25

%

 11.75

%

 26.25

%

Actual Results

 

1,937,000

 

 

26.25 

% 

 

24.2

%

 

26.25 

% 

 1,590,000  26.25

%

 -10.72

%

 0

%

 

EPS Component

 

EPS ($)

 

EPS

Growth

2021/2020

 

Bonus as

Percentage of

Base Salary

 

EPS ($)

 

Bonus as

Percentage

of

Base Salary

 

Threshold

 

2.59

 

 

0.0

%

 

1.75

%

 3.24   1.75

%

Target

 

2.75

 

 

6.2

%

 

8.75

%

 3.44   8.75

%

Maximum

 

2.95

or greater

 

13.9

%

 

17.50

%

 3.69 

or greater

 17.50

%

Actual Results

 

3.79

  * 

 

46.3

% *

 

17.50

%

 3.86 *  17.50

%

 

* Adjusted for one-time acquisition costs. This result represents a non-GAAP financial measure. See Appendix A for a reconciliation of GAAP and non-GAAP financial measures.

 

Mr. Rehm

Mr. Rehm’s short-term incentive includes two components: a line of business component and consolidated EPS of the Company. The Committee believes it is important for Mr. Rehm to have both line of business and overall bank performance components to his short-term incentive plan as growth in departmental profitability directly affects the profitability of the Company and significantly enhances shareholder value. As a result, the Committee believes Mr. Rehm should be partly measured on the overall success of the Company. Mr. Rehm’s incentive is weighted 75% for his line of business and 25% for overall Company performance, and the Compensation Committee considers his line of business goals to be appropriately challenging to attain. The matrix used to compute the incentive award, shown below, is structured such that achievement of target performance in all categories results in a cash incentive equal to 35% of base salary. The Committee established a hurdle for adjusted EPS of $3.23 for Mr. Rehm to receive any short-term incentive award, including from his line of business component; Mr. Rehm would not have received any short-term incentive award had adjusted EPS been $3.22 or lower. Because the Company’s actual adjusted EPS in 2022 exceeded this hurdle, Mr. Rehm was eligible to receive a short-term incentive award.

Line of Business Component

Mr. Rehm’s line of business bonus consists of a matrix of all areas of his responsibility including:  Commercial Banking, Private Banking, Corporate Cash Management, International, and Correspondent Banking.  The Commercial Banking areas are the source of significant loan and deposit growth.  Net interest income comprises approximately two-thirds of the Company’s consolidated revenues.  Growth in these areas significantly impacts the profitably of the Company.  Mr. Rehm’s matrix assigns various weights to several categories including: net loan and deposit growth, related fee income, credit quality and overall management.  The program requires attainment of a minimum of 20 points in aggregate for any incentive bonus to be paid.  Additionally, certain point deductions are considered to promote asset quality including deductions for higher than expected loan provisioning and non-compliance with established customer service standards.  Conversely, better than expected credit quality provides additional points.  The matrix used to compute the incentive award, shown below, is structured such that achievement of target performance in all categories results in a cash incentive for his line of business component equal to 26.25% of base salary.  Goals are considered appropriately challenging and difficult to achieve.

The loan growth component of Mr. Rehm’s incentive plan is weighted the highest.  This goal is based on growth of loans outstanding rather than gross loan production.  More specifically, loan growth is measured as average loans outstanding year over year.  Total loans increased $1.04 billion, or 25%, from December 31, 2021 to December 31, 2022, driven by the addition of $632 million in loans related to the Commonwealth Bancshares acquisition and strong organic loan growth, which more than offset a $122 million decline in the Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) loan portfolio. Excluding the loans acquired through the Commonwealth Bancshares acquisition and the PPP portfolio, record loan growth of $529 million, or 13%, was experienced between December 31, 2021 and December 31, 2022, driven by solid organic growth across virtually every loan portfolio segment.

The following is a summary of Mr. Rehm’s performance under the line of business component.

Line of Business Component

Specific

Components

Component Weight at

Target Performance

 

Departmental

Points Earned

Loan growth

 50%

 

97.68

Non-interest deposit growth

 10%

 

20.00

Interest bearing deposit growth

10%

 

20.00

Loan fees

 5%

 

10.00

Deposit service charge revenue

 5%

 

6.45

Corporate treasury management revenue

 5%

 

6.40

Credit card revenue

 5%

 

7.91

Credit quality

 10%

 

20.00

Total

 100%

 

188.44

The following summarizes the line of business component of Mr. Rehm’s parameter of the plan.

Bonus as a Percentage of Salary

Threshold

Target

Maximum

Actual

50

100

200

188.44

13.125%

26.25%

52.50%

49.46%

EPS Component

  

EPS ($)

 

Bonus as

Percentage

of

Base Salary

 

Threshold

  3.24    1.75

%

Target

  3.44    8.75

%

Maximum

  3.69 

or greater

  17.50

%

Actual Results

  3.86   17.50

%

* Adjusted for one-time acquisition costs. This result represents a non-GAAP financial measure. See Appendix A for a reconciliation of GAAP and non-GAAP financial measures.

Short-Term Cash Payouts

 

Having determined the total 20212022 annual incentive plan payouts for each eligible NEO, the Committee then approved the annual incentive plan payout amounts as summarized below:

 

 

Salary ($)

 

Target Bonus

(%)

 

Target Bonus

($)

 

Actual Earned

%

 

Actual

Earned ($)

Hillebrand

 

   560,000

 

50%

 280,000 

200%

  

560,000

Poindexter

       396,000

 

40%

 

158,400

 

200%

 

316,800

Thompson

       364,000

 

35%

 

127,400

 

200%

 

254,800

Stinnett

       317,000

 

35%

 

110,950

 

200%

 

221,900

Dishman

       289,000

 

30%

 

86,700

 

200%

 

173,400

39

Executive

 

Salary ($)

  

Target Bonus (%)

  

Target Bonus ($)

  

Actual Earned %

  

Actual

Earned ($)

 

Hillebrand

  710,000   50%  355,000   200%  710,000 

Poindexter

  465,000   40%  186,000   200%  372,000 

Stinnett

  400,000   35%  140,000   200%  280,000 

Thompson

  385,000   35%  134,750   125%  168,438 

Rehm

  335,000   35%  117,250   191%  224,316 

 

Long-Term Incentives

 

The Committee believes that long-term incentive stock awards effectively align executives with interests of shareholders by providing individuals who have responsibility for management and growth of the Company with an opportunity to increase their ownership of the Company's Common Stock and to have a meaningful interest in the future of the Company and sustained shareholder value creation.  In making determination about the mix of vehicles in the long-term incentive equity grants, the Compensation Committee allocates a higher than median portion to performance-based equity, and a lower portion to time-based equity.

 

20212022 Equity Awards

 

In 2021,2022, the Committee continued its historical practice of having PSUs at target constitute 75% of the grant date value of the total long-term award and SARs represent 25% of the total long-term award. The value of the long-term incentive award was determined as a percentage of the participant’s 20212022 base salary and is subsequently expressed as a number of shares of Company Common Stock valued on the date of grant. The following table summarizes the equity awards made to NEOs in 2021.2022.

 

2021The Compensation Committee generally makes grants of stock awards to our NEOs at the second Compensation Committee meeting of our fiscal year, which typically occurs in mid-February. Awards are neither timed to relate to the price of our stock nor to correspond with the release of material non-public information, although grants are generally made when our trading window is open. Grants to current employees are generally effective on the date of the Compensation Committee meeting approving such grants. Grants to new employees, including potential NEOs, are typically made at the next regularly scheduled Compensation Committee meeting following the employee’s start date. The standard vesting schedule for our equity grants is 100% after the third year for performance stock units and 20% per year over five years for stock appreciation rights.

2022 Grant Summary

 

 

 

 

 

PSUs at Target (1) 

 

SARs (2)

     

PSUs at Target (1)

  

SARs (2)

 

 

% of Base

Salary

 

Number
Granted

 

Fair Value ($)

 

Number
Granted

 

Fair Value ($)

 

% of Base

Salary

  

Number
Granted

  

Fair Value

  

Number
Granted

  

Fair Value

 

Hillebrand

 

45

%

 

5,670

 

 

252,000

 

 

8,615

 

 

84,000

 

 60

%

 6,590  $319,483  10,142  $106,491 

Poindexter

 

36

%

 

3,207

 

 

142,560

 

 

4,873

 

 

47,520

 

 48

%

 3,452  167,353  5,314  55,797 

Stinnett

 42

%

 2,599  126,000  4,000  42,000 

Thompson

 

32

%

 

2,580

 

 

114,660

 

 

3,920

 

 

38,220

 

 42

%

 2,501  121,248  3,850  40,425 

Stinnett

 

32

%

 

2,246

 

 

99,855

 

 

3,413

 

 

33,285

 

Dishman

 

27

%

 

1,755

 

 

78,030

 

 

2,667

 

 

26,010

 

Rehm

 42

%

 2,176  105,492  3,350  35,175 

 

(1)

Because grantees are not entitled to dividend payments during the performance period and have a mandatory one-year post-vesting holding period, the fair value of these PSUs is estimated based upon the fair value of the underlying shares on the date of the grant.

(2) 

Because granteesSARs are not entitled to dividend payments during the performance period and have a mandatory one-year post-vesting holding period, the fair valuevalued using Black-Scholes option pricing model as of these PSUs is estimated based upon the fair value of the underlying shares on the date of the grant.

(2)

SARs are valued using Black-Scholes option pricing model as of the date of grant. 

 

 

Performance Stock Units

 

In 2021,2022, the Committee granted PSUs to each of the NEOs. PSUs were awarded under the following terms:

 

Performance period:  

Three years, beginning January 1, 20212022 through December 31, 2023.2024.

 

 

Performance goals at

 

50% weighting each:

1. Cumulative EPS over the three-year performance period, excluding any acquisition costs and restructuring adjustments made to EPS as a result of a business combination that occurs during the performance period.

   

2. ROAA over the three-year performance period compared to all publicly traded banks with total assets between $1.5$6.0 and $7.0$16.0 billion as calculated by S&P Global Market Intelligence. Performance will be measured by calculating the simple average of the Company’s ROAA for the three years in the performance period and determining the percentile ranking as compared to peers. The Company’s net income is to be determined in a manner consistent with the definition of EPS above.

Performance ranges:

Performance ranges:

The PSUs provide for threshold, target and maximum performance goals as follows:

 

 

Threshold

 

Target

 

Maximum

 

 

Threshold

 

Target

 

Maximum

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Three-year cumulative EPS

 

 

 

See Below

 

 

 

 

 

 

See below

 

 

 

Peer bank ROAA performance percentile

 

80%

 

85%

 

90%

 

 

80%

 

85%

 

90%

 

 

Three-year EPS performance goals have been established by the Committee and consider the Company’s strategic plan as well as projected growth targets in order to maintain our standard as a top-performing community bank. The three-year EPS goal has defined threshold, target and maximum performance levels. We have elected not to disclose these performance levels for competitive reasons, but we note that the levels for 20212022 PSUs were set higher than those for the grants of PSUs made in 2020.2021, and are substantially above our EPS performance in 2021 and prior years.

 

The table below summarizes the design of the PSU portion of the 20212022 long-term incentive plan (all percentages relate to each executive’s 20212022 base salary in effect at January 1, 2021)2022):

 

 

EPS

 

ROAA vs. Peers

 

Total Value of PSUs that may be

Earned, Based on Grant-Date

Value, as a % of Base Salary

 

EPS

  

ROAA vs. Peers

  

Total Value of PSUs that may be

Earned, Based on Grant-Date

Value, as a % of Base Salary

 

 

Threshold

 

Target

 

Maximum

 

Threshold

 

Target

 

Maximum

 

Threshold

 

Target

 

Maximum

 

Threshold

 

Target

 

Maximum

  

Threshold

 

Target

 

Maximum

  

Threshold

 

Target

 

Maximum

 

Hillebrand

 

9.0

%

 

22.5

%

 

56.25

%

 

9.0

%

 

22.5

%

 

56.25

%

 

18.0

%

 

45.0

%

 

112.5

%

 9.00

%

 22.50

%

 56.25

%

 9.00

%

 22.50

%

 56.25

%

 18.00

%

 45.00

%

 112.50

%

Poindexter

 

7.2

%

 

18.0

%

 

45.0

%

 

7.2

%

 

18.0

%

 

45.0

%

 

14.4

%

 

36.0

%

 

90.0

%

 7.20

%

 18.00

%

 45.00

%

 7.20

%

 18.00

%

 45.00

%

 14.40

%

 36.00

%

 90.00

%

Stinnett

 

6.3

%

 

15.75

%

 

39.375

%

 

6.3

%

 

15.75

%

 

39.375

%

 

12.6

%

 

31.5

%

 

78.75

%

 6.30

%

 15.75

%

 39.38

%

 6.30

%

 15.75

%

 39.38

%

 12.60

%

 31.50

%

 78.75

%

Thompson

 

6.3

%

 

15.75

%

 

39.375

%

 

6.3

%

 

15.75

%

 

39.375

%

 

12.6

%

 

31.5

%

 

78.75

%

 6.30

%

 15.75

%

 39.38

%

 6.30

%

 15.75

%

 39.38

%

 12.60

%

 31.50

%

 78.75

%

Dishman

 

5.4

%

 

13.5

%

 

33.75

%

 

5.4

%

 

13.5

%

 

33.75

%

 

10.8

%

 

27.0

%

 

67.50

%

Rehm

 6.30

%

 15.75

%

 39.38

%

 6.30

%

 15.75

%

 39.38

%

 12.60

%

 31.50

%

 78.75

%

 

PSUs certified as earned by the Committee at the end of the performance period will be distributed to participants by March 31st of the year following the performance period. All payouts of PSUs will be made in shares of Company Common Stock based on the percentage earned of the target number of shares per participant determined at the beginning of the performance period.

 

41

PSUs generally require the executive to remain employed or serve on the Board of Directors until the end of a performance cycle in order to vest and be paid in shares of Common Stock, with prorated awards still distributed after the end of the performance cycle to those who leave the Company mid-cycle due to death, disability or retirement (age 60).  PSUs also vest at the target level if a change in control occurs before a performance cycle ends. Executives do not receive the benefit of any dividends or other distributions paid on stock related to PSUs until after the stock is actually issued. In addition, executives are required to observe a one-year holding period after vesting, net of any shares sold to pay taxes.

 

No pandemic-related changes were implemented to our long-term incentive awards granted in 20212022 or prior years.

 

PSUs granted in 20192020 vested as of December 31, 20212022 and will be certified and distributed by March 31, 2022.2023. Based on our aggregate EPS for the three-year performance period 2019-20212020-2022 and preliminary data indicating that our average adjusted ROAA for the three-year performance period of 1.53%* exceeded the 90th percentile of the comparator group, we expect that recipients will be awarded grants on the EPS portion at maximum and the ROAA portionsportion at the maximum performance levels.

 

* Adjusted for one-time acquisition costs. This result represents a non-GAAP financial measure. See Appendix A for a reconciliation of GAAP and non-GAAP financial measures.

Stock Appreciation Rights

 

The Committee favors continuing the use of SARs because they directly align the interests of executives with shareholders’ interests as value is only realized through a rising stock price. SARs provide a NEOthe recipient with the right to receive Company Common Stock equal in value to the appreciation in Company stock, if any, over the stock price as of the grant date as compared with the stock price during the exercise period. SARs granted to executives in 20212022 vest ratably over five years and the exercise period is ten years from the grant date.

 

V. 

Additional Compensation Policies and Practices

Other Executive Benefits

 

Post-Employment Compensation and Benefits. To enhance the objective of retaining key executives, the Company established Change in Control Severance (“CICS”) Agreements, concluding it to be in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders to take reasonable steps to compensate key executives, including all NEOs, in the event of a change in control or similar event. With these agreements in place, if the Company should receive takeover or acquisition proposals from third parties, the Company will be able to call upon these key executives for their advice and assessment of whether such proposals are in the best interests of shareholders, free of the influences of their personal employment situations. The CICS Agreements require both a significant change in the Company’s ownership and termination of employment before executives would receive any payment under the agreements. This approach is commonly referred to as a double-trigger.double trigger.

 

Supplemental Retirement Benefits. The Bank has a nonqualified deferred compensation plan that allows executives to defer a portion of their cash compensation, and the Bank credits those deferrals with contributions that the executives do not receive under the KSOP because of limits under the KSOP or the Internal Revenue Code. The Committee believes that the nonqualified deferred compensation plan provides the Company with the ability to attract and retain key employees. Further details about the nonqualified deferred compensation plan may be found in the narrative preceding the Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Table.

 

In the 1980's,1980s, the Bank created a plan (called the Senior Officer Security Plan (“SOSP”)) to enhance the retirement security of certain NEOs by granting them a fixed annual benefit per year after retirement. This fixed amount was originally designed to supplement broader-based retirement programs and bring the executives' retirement income from combined sources of the tax-qualified employer retirement programs, Social Security and the SOSP to a level of approximately 70% of their pre-retirement income. Once implemented, the benefit amounts were never adjusted and therefore the SOSP is not expected to yield the level of income replacement contemplated. The SOSP still covers one current executive officer, Ms. Thompson, and there are no intentions to adjust her payment or add additional participants.

 


Stock Ownership Guidelines

 

The Committee believes that our executive officers should maintain meaningful equity interests in the Company to ensure that their interests are aligned with those of our shareholders. We adopted stock ownership guidelines that require our executive officers to own directly or indirectly a minimum level of the Company’s Common Stock, depending upon the executive’s position. Shares held by the executive, the executive’s spouse, or minor children, including, without limitation, shares held for the account of the executive in the Dividend Reinvestment Plan, the Company’s KSOP plan or an IRA are deemed owned by the executive under the guidelines. New or newly promoted officers to an executive level are required to reach the guidelines within five years of attaining executive status. The valuation is based on the closing price on the last trading day of the preceding calendar year. The Committee regularly reviews these guidelines in light of changing market trends, governance best practices and policies of our peer banks. In November 20202021 this review led us to increasemaintain the multiple for our CEO from 5x toat 6x, in order to remainremaining in a leadership position with respect to our ownership guidelines.

 

Position 

Multiple of Base Salary 

Chief Executive Officer

6x

President

4x

All Other Named Executive Officers

3x

 

All NEOs are currently exceed his or herin compliance with their applicable stock ownership guidelines.

 

Claw backs

Clawbacks

 

The Committee maintains a general claw backclawback policy to give the Company the flexibility to require the return of paid compensation in certain circumstances.

 

The policy allows the Company to recover some or all of the amounts paid with respect to awards that were based on achievement of performance criteria, at any time in the three calendar years following payment, if and to the extent that the Committee concludes that (i) federal or state law or the listing requirements of the exchange on which the Company’s stock is listed for trading so require, (ii) the performance criteria required for the award were not met, or not met to the extent necessary to support the amount of the award that was paid, or (iii) as required by Section 304 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, after a restatement of the Company’s financial results as reported to the Securities and Exchange Commission.

 

Anti-Hedging and Anti-Pledging Policy

 

Under our insider trading policy, no director, officer (including our NEOs) or employee is permitted to engage in securities transactions that would allow them either to insulate themselves from, or profit from, a decline in the Company’s stock price. Similarly, no director, officer (including our NEOs) or employee may enter into hedging transactions in the Company stock. Such transactions include (without limitation) short sales as well as any hedging transactions in derivative securities (e.g. puts, calls, swaps or collars) or other speculative transactions related to the Company’s stock. Holding Company stock in a margin account or pledging Company stock is also generally prohibited.

 

Income Tax Considerations

 

Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code generally limits the deductibility of compensation in excess of $1 million paid by a public company to its named executive officers. The Committee believes that tax deductibility is one of many factors to be considered in developing an appropriate compensation package for executives, and that shareholder interests are not best served if the Committee’s flexibility and discretion is limited by restricting executive compensation to deductible compensation. The Committee has in the past approved compensation that may not be fully deductible because of Section 162(m). Similarly, the Committee may exercise its judgment in this area and award compensation in the future that is not fully deductible under Section 162(m) if the Committee believes that such compensation will help the Company achieve its business objectives and serve the best interests of its shareholders.

 

 

REPORT OF THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE

 

The Committee has reviewed and discussed with management the Compensation Discussion and Analysis and based on such review and discussions the Committee has recommended to the Board that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in Stock Yards Bancorp, Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K and the Proxy Statement.

 

The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of Stock Yards Bancorp, Inc.

 

 

Richard A. Lechleiter, Chairman

Stephen M. Priebe

Edwin S. Saunier

John L. Schutte

 

 

The report of the Compensation Committee shall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section, nor shall it be deemed soliciting material or subject to Regulation 14A of the Exchange Act or incorporated by reference in any filing under the Exchange Act or the Securities Act of 1933, except as shall be expressly set forth by specific reference in such filing.

 

 

Executive Compensation Tables and Narrative Disclosure

 

The following table sets forth information concerning the compensation of our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, and the three most highly compensated executive officers other than the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer. Throughout this section, we refer to executives named in this table individually as the “executive” and collectively as the “executives”. Each executive holds those same offices at the Bank, as well.

 

Compensation is presented for all years in which the executives were also named executive officers.

 

Summary Compensation Table

Summary Compensation Table

                                        

Name and

 

Salary

Bonus

Stock
Awards

Option
Awards

Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation

Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings

All Other Compensation

Total

  

Salary

 

Bonus

 

Stock
Awards

 

Option
Awards

 

Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation

 

Change in

Pension Value

and

Nonqualified

Deferred

Compensation

Earnings

 

All Other Compensation

 

Total

 

Principal Position

Year

($)

($)

($) (1)

($) (2)

($) (3)

($) (4)

($) (5) (6)

($)

Year

 ($)  ($)  ($)(1)  ($)(2)  ($)(3)  ($)(4)  ($)(5)  ($) 
                           

James A. Hillebrand

2021

560,000

-

251,975

83,996

560,000

-

92,843

1,548,814

2022

 710,000  -  319,483  106,491  710,000  -  116,390  1, 962,364 

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

2020

560,000

-

251,996

83,996

280,000

-

92,326

1,268,318

2019

540,000

-

242,980

80,999

540,000

-

89,155

1,493,134

Chairman and Chief Executive

2021

 560,000  -  251,975  83,996  560,000  -  92,843  1,548,814 

Officer

2020

 560,000  -  251,996  83,996  280,000  -  92,326  1,268,318 
                           

Philip S. Poindexter

2021

396,000

-

142,519

47,512

316,800

-

67,144

969,975

2022

 465,000  -  167,353  55,797  372,000  -  78,211  1,138,361 

President

2020

396,000

-

142,537

47,519

158,400

-

66,544

811,000

2021

 396,000  -  142,519  47,512  316,800  -  67,144  969,975 

2019

385,000

-

138,594

46,197

308,000

-

65,111

942,902

2020

 396,000  -  142,537  47,519  158,400  -  66,544  811,000 
                           

T. Clay Stinnett

2021

317,000

-

99,812

33,277

221,900

-

53,265

725,254

2022

 400,000  -  126,000  42,000  280,000  -  66,693  914,693 

Chief Financial Officer

2020

317,000

-

99,843

33,280

110,950

-

53,682

614,755

2021

 317,000  -  99,812  33,277  221,900  -  53,265  725,254 

2019

301,000

-

81,260

89,933

180,600

-

50,816

703,609

2020

 317,000  -  99,843  33,280  110,950  -  53,682  614,755 
                  

Kathy C. Thompson

2021

364,000

-

114,655

38,220

254,800

-

64,343

836,018

2022

 385,000  -  121,248  40,425  168,438  -  68,503  783,614 

Senior EVP and Director of

2020

364,000

-

114,655

38,216

168,022

100,368

63,914

849,175

2021

 364,000  -  114,655  38,220  254,800  -  64,343  836,018 

Wealth Management and Trust

2019

364,000

-

114,635

38,219

159,250

127,233

63,809

867,146

2020

 364,000  -  114,655  38,216  168,022  100,368  63,914  849,175 
                           

William M. Dishman III

2021

289,000

-

77,992

26,003

173,400

-

49,818

616,213

EVP and Chief Risk Officer

2020

289,000

-

78,029

26,007

86,700

-

49,817

529,553

Michael Rehm

2022

 335,000  -  105,492  35,175  224,316  -  58,438  758,421 

Chief Lending Officer

                                 

2019

286,000

-

77,192

25,739

171,600

-

49,540

610,071

                  
         

 

(1)

Stock awards include PSUs entitling executives to the issuance of one share of Common Stock for each vested PSU after the expiration of a three-year performance period. The value of the PSU grants measured at the grant date value was $48.48 in 2022, $44.44 in 2021 and $32.27 in 2020 and $32.03 in 2019.2020. The amount of related compensation included in the table above is that associated with the most probable performance outcome at the time of the grant. The table below reflects first the amount of compensation included in the table above is that associated withSummary Compensation Table and second, the most probable performance outcome at the time of the grant. The table below reflects first themaximum amount of compensation included in the Summary Compensation Table and second, the maximum amount achievable under these grants.

 

2021

  

2020

  

2019

  

2022

  

2021

  

2020

 
 

Most

Probable on

Date of Grant

  

Maximum

  

Most Probable on

Date of Grant

  

Maximum

  

Most Probable on

Date of Grant

  

Maximum

  

Most

Probable on

Date of

Grant ($)

  

Maximum ($)

  

Most

Probable on

Date of

Grant ($)

  

Maximum ($)

  

Most

Probable on

Date of

Grant ($)

  

Maximum ($)

 

Hillebrand

 $251,975  $629,981  $251,996  $629,975  $242,980  $607,481  319,483  798,708  251,975  629,981  251,996  629,975 

Poindexter

  142,519   356,364   142,537   356,390   138,594   346,469  167,353  418,479  142,519  356,364  142,537  356,390 

Stinnett

  99,812   249,619   99,843   249,608   81,260   203,166  126,000  314,975  99,812  249,619  99,843  249,608 

Thompson

  114,655   286,638   114,655   286,622   114,635   286,636  121,248  303,145  114,655  286,638  114,655  286,622 

Dishman

  77,992   195,047   78,029   195,072   77,192   193,045 

Rehm

 105,492  263,780  -  -  -  - 

 

(2)

Customary SARs were granted with an exercise price equal to the closing price of the Common Stock on the applicable grant date, or $50.71,$54.91,$50.71 and $37.30 in 2022, 2021 and $36.65 in 2021, 2020, and 2019, respectively. The fair value of each SAR was $10.50, $9.75 and $5.80, and $6.61 respectively. SARs granted to Mr. Stinnett in conjunction with his May 1, 2019 promotion were granted with an exercise price of 10% higher than the closing price of the Common Stock on the grant date or $34.71, and the fair value of each of these SARs was $5.03. For assumptions used in valuation of SARs and other information regarding stock-based compensation, refer to Note 1719 to the 20212022 consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC.

 

 

(3)

In the earlier section of this proxy statementProxy Statement captionedCompensation Discussion and Analysis, we refer to Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation as Compensation Discussion and Analysisshort-term cash incentives, we refer to Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation as or short-term cash incentivesincentives. or cash incentives.

(4)

Assumptions used in calculating the change in actuarial value of the defined benefit above include a discount rate of 5.10% for December 31, 2022, 2.84% for December 31, 2021 and 2.43% for December 31, 2020, and 3.16% for December 31, 2019, retirement age of 65, and payments occurring for 15 years, with no pre- or post-retirement mortality. Earnings on the executives' nonqualified deferred compensation balances are not included above. The investment alternatives of the nonqualified plan do not and have not offered above-market rates of interest or preferential returns.

Earnings on the executives' nonqualified deferred compensation balances are not included above. The investment alternatives of the nonqualified plan do not and have not offered above-market rates of interest or preferential returns.

(5)

All Other Compensation in 20212022 consists of the following:

 

  

Hillebrand

  

Poindexter

  

Stinnett

  

Thompson

  

Dishman

 

Matching contribution to 401(k)

 $17,400  $17,400  $17,400  $17,400  $17,340 

Contribution to ESOP

  5,800   5,800   5,800   5,800   5,780 

Contribution to nonqualified plan *

  66,400   40,160   27,520   35,040   23,120 

Other

  3,243   3,784   2,545   6,103   3,578 

* This is a Bank contribution to supplement the contributions that the executive does not receive under the Bank’s tax- qualified KSOP because of plan limits or Internal Revenue Code limits.

  

Hillebrand

  

Poindexter

  

Stinnett

  

Thompson

  

Rehm

 

Matching contribution to 401(k)

 $18,300  $18,300  $18,300  $18,300  $18,300 

Contribution to ESOP

  6,100   6,100   6,100   6,100   6,100 

Contribution to nonqualified plan *

  89,200   50,000   39,600   37,200   29,200 

Other

  2,790   3,811   2,693   6,903   4,838 

 

(6)*

Perquisites totaled less than $10,000 for eachThis is a Bank contribution to supplement the contributions that the executive withdoes not receive under the exception of Mr. Hillebrand, and are therefore not included in the table. Detail related to Mr. HillebrandBanks perquisites follows:tax- qualified KSOP because of plan limits or Internal Revenue Code limits.

  

Hillebrand

 

Club membership initiation fee and dues

 $10,500 

Excess liability insurance premium

 $2,295 

Cell phone reimbursement

 $1,500 
  $14,295 


 

The following table sets forth information concerning plan-based awards made to the executives during the last fiscal year.

 

Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table

                                     
   

Payouts

under non-equity

incentive plan awards (1)

  

Estimated future payouts

under equity

incentive plan awards (2)

  

All other

stock awards:

number of

shares of

stock or

  

All other
option awards:

number of

securities

underlying

  

Exercise

or base

price of

option

  

Grant
date fair

value of

stock and

option

 
 

Grant

 

Threshold

  

Target

  

Maximum

  

Threshold

  

Target

  

Maximum

  units  options  awards  awards 

Name

date

 

($)

  

($)

  

($)

  

(#)

  

(#)

  

(#)

  (#)  (#)(3)  ($/Sh)  ($) 

Hillebrand

2/25/21

  56,000   280,000   560,000   -   -   -   -   -   -   - 
 

2/25/21

  -   -   -   2,268   5,670   14,176   -   -   -   251,975 
 

2/25/21

  -   -   -   -   -   -   -   8,615   50.71   83,996 

Poindexter

2/25/21

  31,680   158,400   316,800   -   -   -   -   -   -   - 
 

2/25/21

  -   -   -   1,283   3,207   8,019   -   -   -   142,519 
 

2/25/21

  -   -   -   -   -   -   -   4,873   50.71   47,512 

Stinnett

2/25/21

  22,190   110,950   221,900   -   -   -   -   -   -   - 
 

2/25/21

  -   -   -   898   2,246   5,617   -   -   -   99,812 
 

2/25/21

  -   -   -   -   -   -   -   3,413   50.71   33,277 

Thompson

2/25/21

  25,480   127,400   254,800   -   -   -   -   -   -   - 
 

2/25/21

  -   -   -   1,032   2,580   6,450   -   -   -   114,655 
 

2/25/21

  -   -   -   -   -   -   -   3,920   50.71   38,220 

Dishman

2/25/21

  17,340   86,700   173,400   -   -   -   -   -   -   - 
 

2/25/21

  -   -   -   702   1,755   4,389   -   -   -   77,992 
 

2/25/21

  -   -   -   -   -   -   -   2,667   50.71   26,003 

Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table

                     All other  All other       
                     stock  option     Grant 
                     awards:  awards:  Exercise  date fair 
   Payouts  Estimated future payouts  number of  number of  or base  value of 
   under non-equity  under equity  shares of  securities  price of  stock and 
   incentive plan awards (1)  incentive plan awards (2)  stock or  underlying  option  option 
 Grant Threshold  Target  Maximum  Threshold  Target  Maximum  units  options  awards  awards 

Name

date

 ($)  ($)  ($)  ($)  ($)  ($)  (#)    (#)(3)   ($/Sh)  ($)  

Hillebrand

2/14/22

 71,000  355,000  710,000  -  -  -  -  -  -  - 
 

2/14/22

 -  -  -  2,636  6,590  16,475  -  -  -  319,483 
 

2/14/22

 -  -  -  -  -  -  -  10,142  54.91  106,491 

Poindexter

2/14/22

 37,200  186,000  372,000  -  -  -  -  -  -  - 
 

2/14/22

 -  -  -  1,381  3,452  8,632  -  -  -  167,353 
 

2/14/22

 -  -  -  -  -  -  -  5,314  54.91  55,797 

Stinnett

2/14/22

 28,000  140,000  280,000  -  -  -  -  -  -  - 
 

2/14/22

 -  -  -  1,039  2,599  6,497  -  -  -  126,000 
 

2/14/22

 -  -  -  -  -  -  -  4,000  54.91  42,000 

Thompson

2/14/22

 26,950  134,750  269,500  -  -  -  -  -  -  - 
 

2/14/22

 -  -  -  1,000  2,501  6,253  -  -  -  121,248 
 

2/14/22

 -  -  -  -  -  -  -  3,850  54.91  40,425 

Rehm

2/14/22

 23,450  117,250  234,500  -  -  -  -  -  -  - 
 

2/14/22

 -  -  -  870  2,176  5,441  -  -  -  105,492 
 

2/14/22

 -  -  -  -  -  -  -  3,350  54.91  35,175 

 

All material terms and conditions of grants are described in the section of this Proxy Statement captioned “Compensation Discussion and Analysis”. All equity grants were made under our 2015 Omnibus Equity Compensation Plan. Grants consisted of:

 

(1)

Cash incentives

(2)

Cash incentivesPSUs

(2)(3)

PSUs

(3)

SARs

 

 

The following table sets forth information concerning SARs, RSAs and PSUs held by the executives as of the end of the last fiscal year.

 

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year End Table

 

 

Option Awards

 

Stock Awards

  

Option Awards

 

Stock Awards

 

Name

 

Number of

securities

underlying

unexercised

options

(#)

Exercisable

  

Number of

securities

underlying

unexercised

options

(#) (1)

Unexercisable

  

Option

exercise

price

($)

 

Option

expiration

date

 

Number of

shares or

units of stock

that have not

vested

(#)

  

Market value

of shares or

units of stock

that have not

vested

($)

  

Equity

incentive plan

awards:

number of

unearned

shares, units or

other rights

that have not

vested

(#) (2)

  

Equity

incentive plan

awards:

market or

payout value

of unearned

shares, units or

other rights

that have not

vested

($)

  

Number of securities underlying unexercised options

(#)

Exercisable

 

Number of securities underlying unexercised options

(#) (1)

Unexercisable

 

Option

exercise price

($)

 

Option

expiration

date

 

Number of

shares or

units of

stock that

have not

vested

(#) (2)

 

Market

value of

shares or

units of

stock that

have not

vested

($)

 

Equity incentive plan awards: number of unearned shares, units or other rights that have not vested

(#) (2)

 

Equity incentive plan awards:

market or payout value of unearned shares, units or other rights that have not vested

($)

 

Hillebrand

                              
  28,054   -   15.26 

2/19/2023

  -   -   -   -  16,425  -  19.37 

2/18/2024

 -  -  -  - 
  16,425   -   19.37 

2/18/2024

  -   -   -   -  12,319  -  22.96 

3/17/2025

 -  -  -  - 
  12,319   -   22.96 

3/17/2025

  -   -   -   -  14,428  -  25.76 

3/15/2026

 -  -  -  - 
  14,428   -   25.76 

3/15/2026

  -   -   -   -  7,571  -  40.00 

3/21/2027

 -  -  -  - 
  6,056   1,515   40.00 

3/21/2027

  -   -   -   -  5,938  1,485  35.90 

2/20/2028

 -  -  -  - 
  4,453   2,970   35.90 

2/20/2028

  -   -   -   -  20,000  5,000  39.32 

10/1/2028

 -  -  -  - 
  15,000   10,000   39.32 

10/1/2028

  -   -   -   -  7,352  4,902  36.65 

2/19/2029

 -  -  -  - 
  4,901   7,353   36.65 

10/1/2028

  -   -   -   -  5,793  8,689  37.30 

2/25/2030

 -  -  -  - 
  2,896   11,586   37.30 

2/25/2030

  -   -   19,522   1,247,065  1,723  6,892  50.71 

2/25/2031

 -  -  14,176  921,156 
  -   8,615   50.71 

2/25/2031

  -   -   14,176   905,563   -  10,142  54.91 

2/14/2032

  -  -  16,475  1,070,546 
  104,532   42,039        -   -   33,698   2,152,628   91,549  37,110      -  -  30,651  1,991,702 
                              

Poindexter

                              
  8,872   -   19.37 

2/18/2024

  -   -   -   -  8,098  -  22.96 

3/17/2025

 -  -  -  - 
  8,098   -   22.96 

3/17/2025

  -   -   -   -  9,469  -  25.76 

3/15/2026

 -  -  -  - 
  9,469   -   25.76 

3/15/2026

  -   -   -   -  4,968  -  40.00 

3/21/2027

 -  -  -  - 
  3,974   994   40.00 

3/21/2027

 

‐-

   -   -   -  3,897  975  35.90 

2/20/2028

 

‐-

  -  -  - 
  2,923   1,949   35.90 

2/20/2028

  -   -   -   -  14,000  3,500  39.32 

10/1/2028

 -  -  -  - 
  10,500   7,000   39.32 

10/1/2028

  -   -   -   -  4,193  2,796  36.65 

2/19/2029

 -  -  -  - 
  2,795   4,194   36.65 

2/19/2029

  -   -   -   -  3,277  4,916  37.30 

2/25/2030

 -  -  -  - 
  1,638   6,555   37.30 

2/25/2030

  -   -   11,044   705,491  975  3,898  50.71 

2/25/2031

 -  -  8,019  521,075 
  -   4,873   50.71 

2/25/2031

  -   -   8,019   512,254   -  5,314  54.91 

2/14/2032

  -  -   8,632   560,907 
  48,269   25,565        -   -   19,063   1,217,744   48,877  21,399      -  -  16,651  1,081,982 
                              

Stinnett

                              
  11,502   -   15.26 

2/19/2023

  -   -   -   -  6,861  -  19.37 

2/18/2024

 -  -  -  - 
  6,861   -   19.37 

2/18/2024

  -   -   -   -  5,481  -  22.96 

3/17/2025

 -  -  -  - 
  5,481   -   22.96 

3/17/2025

  -   -   -   -  6,871  -  25.76 

3/15/2026

 -  -  -  - 
  6,871   -   25.76 

3/15/2026

  -   -   -   -  3,606  -  40.00 

3/21/2027

 -  -  -  - 
  2,884   722   40.00 

3/21/2027

  -   -   -   -  2,832  709  35.90 

2/20/2028

 -  -  -  - 
  2,124   1,417   35.90 

2/20/2028

  -   -   -   -  2,458  1,640  36.65 

2/19/2029

 -  -  -  - 
  1,639   2,459   36.65 

2/19/2029

  -   -   -   -  7,500  5,000  38.18 

5/1/2029

 -  -  -  - 
  5,000   7,500   38.18 

5/1/2029

  -   -   -   -  2,295  3,443  37.30 

2/25/2030

 -  -  -  - 
  1,147   4,591   37.30 

2/25/2030

  -   -   7,735   494,112  683  2,730  50.71 

2/25/2031

 -  -  5,617  364,993 
  -   3,413   50.71 

2/25/2031

  -   -   5,617   358,814   -  4,000  54.91 

2/14/2032

  -  -  6,497  422,175 
  43,509   20,102                13,352   852,926   38,587  17,522          12,114  787,168 

 

(continued)


 

 

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year End Table (continued)

 

 

Option Awards

 

Stock Awards

  

Option Awards

 

Stock Awards

 

Name

 

Number of

securities

underlying

unexercised

options

(#)

Exercisable

  

Number of

securities

underlying

unexercised

options

(#) (1)

Unexercisable

  

Option

exercise

price

($)

 

Option

expiration

date

 

Number of

shares or

units of stock

that have not

vested

(#)

  

Market value

of shares or

units of stock

that have not

vested

($)

  

Equity

incentive plan

awards:

number of

unearned

shares, units or

other rights

that have not

vested

(#) (2)

  

Equity

incentive plan

awards:

market or

payout value

of unearned

shares, units or

other rights

that have not

vested

($)

  

Number of securities underlying unexercised options

(#)

Exercisable

 

Number of securities underlying unexercised options

(#) (1)

Unexercisable

 

Option

exercise price

($)

 

Option

expiration

date

 

Number of shares or units of stock that have not vested

(#)(2)

 

Market value of shares or units of stock that have not vested

($)

 

Equity incentive plan awards: number of unearned shares, units or other rights that have not vested

(#) (2)

 

Equity incentive plan awards:

market or payout value of unearned shares, units or other rights that have not vested

($)

 

Thompson

                              
  1,977   -   22.96 

3/17/2025

  -   -   -   -  -  1,148  35.90 

2/20/2028

 -  -  -  - 
  2,273   -   25.76 

3/15/2026

  -   -   -   -  -  2,313  36.65 

2/19/2029

 -  -  -  - 
  4,769   1,193   40.00 

3/21/2027

  -   -   -   -  -  3,953  37.30 

2/25/2030

 -  -  -  - 
  3,443   2,296   35.90 

2/20/2028

  -   -   -   -  784  3,136  50.71 

2/25/2031

 -  -  6,450  419,121 
  2,312   3,470   36.65 

2/19/2029

  -   -   -   -   -  3,850  54.91 

2/14/2032

  -  -  6,253  406,320 
  1,317   5,272   37.30 

2/25/2030

  -   -   8,882   567,382   784  14,400      -  -  12,703  825,441 
  -   3,920   50.71 

2/25/2031

  -   -   6,450   412,026  
  16,091   16,151        -   -   15,332   979,408 
                             

Dishman

                             

Rehm

 
  8,298   -   19.37 

2/18/2024

  -   -   -   -  -  -  - 

2/2/2023

 147  36.00  -  - 
  6,343   -   22.96 

3/17/2025

  -   -   -   -  8,000  2,000  39.32 

10/1/2028

 -  -  -  - 
  7,170   -   25.76 

3/15/2026

  -   -   -   -  -  1,602  36.65 

2/19/2029

 -  -  -  - 
  3,066   767   40.00 

3/21/2027

 

‐-

   -   -   -  2,006  3,008  37.30 

2/25/2030

 

‐-

  -  -  - 
  2,229   1,487   35.90 

2/20/2028

  -   -   -   -  597  2,386  50.71 

2/25/2031

 -  -  4,908  318,922 
  1,557   2,337   36.65 

2/19/2029

  -   -   -   -   -  3,350  54.91 

2/14/2032

 -  -  5,441  353,556 
  896   3,588   37.30 

2/25/2030

  -   -   6,045   386,155   10,603  12,346     147  -  10,349  672,478 
  -   2,667   50.71 

2/25/2031

  -   -   4,389   280,369 
  29,559   10,846        -   -   10,434   666,524 

 

 

(1)

SARs vest 20% each year beginning one year after the grant date and each anniversary thereafter. The vesting schedule for SARs for each named executive officer is as follows (in number of shares).

 

Vesting Date

 

Hillebrand

  

Poindexter

  

Stinnett

  

Thompson

  

Dishman

  

Hillebrand

  

Poindexter

  

Stinnett

  

Thompson

  

Rehm

 

3/21/2022

  1,515   994   722   1,193   767 

2/19/2022

  2,451   1,398   819   1,157   779 

2/20/2022

  1,485   974   708   1,148   743 

2/25/2022

  4,619   2,613   1,830   2,102   1,430 

5/1/2022

  -   -   2,500   -   - 

10/1/2022

  5,000   3,500   -   -   - 

2/14/2023

 2,028  1,063  800  770  670 

2/19/2023

  2,451   1,398   820   1,156   779  2,451  1,398  820  1,156  801 

2/20/2023

  1,485   975   709   1,148   744  1,485  975  709  1,148  - 

2/25/2023

  4,620   2,613   1,830   2,102   1,430  4,619  2,613  1,830  2,102  1,598 

5/1/2023

  -   -   2,500   -   -  -  -  2,500  -  - 

10/1/2023

  5,000   3,500   -   -   -  5,000  3,500  -  -  2,000 

2/14/2024

 2,029  1,063  800  770  670 

2/19/2024

  2,451   1,398   820   1,157   779  2,451  1,398  820  1,157  801 

2/25/2024

  4,619   2,613   1,830   2,102   1,431  4,620  2,613  1,830  2,102  1,600 

5/1/2024

  -   -   2,500   -   -  -  -  2,500  -  - 

2/14/2025

 2,028  1,062  800  770  670 

2/25/2025

  4,620   2,614   1,831   2,102   1,430  4,620  2,613  1,830  2,101  1,599 

2/14/2026

 2,028  1,063  800  770  670 

2/25/2026

  1,723   975   683   784   534  1,723  975  683  784  597 

2/14/2027

  2,028  1,063  800  770  670 
  42,039   25,565   20,102   16,151   10,846   37,110  21,399  17,522  14,400  12,346 

 

(2)

RSAs (Mr. Rehm only) vest 20% each year beginning one year after the grant date. All RSAs have vested with the exception of 147 shares that will vest on February 2, 2023. PSUs are earned over three year performance periods ending December 31, 20232024 and 20222023 based on EPS and ROAA goals. The vesting schedule for PSUs for each named executive officer is as follows (in number of shares) and represents managements estimate of most likely performance outcomes as of December 31, 2021. For PSUs vesting on December 31, 2022, most likely represents achievement of EPS goals at threshold and ROAA goals at maximum.2022. For PSUs vesting on December 31, 2023, most likely represents achievement of EPS goals at targetmaximum and ROAA goals at target. For PSUs vesting on December 31, 2024, most likely represents achievement of EPS goals at maximum and ROAA goals at maximum.

 

Vesting Date

 

Hillebrand

  

Poindexter

  

Stinnett

  

Thompson

  

Dishman

 

12/31/2022

  19,522   11,044   7,735   8,882   6,045 

12/31/2023

  14,176   8,019   5,617   6,450   4,389 
   33,698   19,063   13,352   15,332   10,434 


Vesting Date

 

Hillebrand

  

Poindexter

  

Stinnett

  

Thompson

  

Rehm

 

12/31/2023

  14,176   8,019   5,617   6,450   4,908 

12/31/2024

  16,475   8,632   6,497   6,253   5,441 
   30,651   16,651   12,114   12,703   10,349 

 

The following table sets forth SARs exercised by or stock awards vested for the executives during the last fiscal year. Stock awards include PSUs that vested on December 31, 2021.2022. Final determination as to the amounts of these awards will be calculated in March 2022.2023. Therefore, the awards in this table are the most probable amount as of December 31, 2021.2022.

 

SAR Exercises and PSU Vesting

             

SAR Exercises and Stock (RSAs and PSUs) Vesting

SAR Exercises and Stock (RSAs and PSUs) Vesting

 
                         
 

SAR Awards

  

Stock Awards

  

SAR Awards

  

Stock Awards

 
 

Number of Shares

  

Value Realized

  

Number of Shares

  

Value Realized

  

Number of Shares

 

Value Realized

 

Number of Shares

 

Value Realized

 
 

Acquired on Exercise

  

on Exercise

  

Acquired on Vesting

  

on Vesting

  

Acquired on Exercise

 

on Exercise

 

Acquired on Vesting

 

on Vesting

 

Name

 

(#)

  

($)

  

(#)

  

($)

  

(#)

  ($)  

(#)

  ($)  

Hillebrand

  19,600   774,200   18,966   1,211,548  28,054  1,106,730  19,522  1,268,540 

Poindexter

  7,575   301,409   10,817   690,990  8,872  363,575  11,044  717,639 

Stinnett

  -   -   6,343   405,191  11,502  521,271  7,735  502,620 

Thompson

  -   -   8,949   571,662  20,908  903,841  8,882  577,152 

Dishman

  5,005   198,148   6,027   385,005 

Rehm

 2,401  55,031  7,008  454,289 

 

Noncontributory Nonqualified Pension Plan

 

The purpose of the 2005 Restated Senior Officer Security Plan (the “SOSP”) was to provide benefits, beginning at age 65, of $82,000 per year for 15 years for Ms. Thompson, as a means to supplement her retirement income, after also considering expected Social Security benefits and the broad-based retirement plan applicable to Bank employees generally. The total potential benefit vests at 4% per year of service so that it is fully vested if the executive works for the Bank for a total of 25 years. At December 31, 2021,2022, Ms. Thompson was fully vested under the plan. There are no intentions to adjust the benefit payments or add additional participants to the SOSP.

 

If the executive terminates employment before age 55, SOSP benefit payments can begin as early as age 55 (or such later age as the executive has elected), but the annual payment amount will be lowered to an actuarially equivalent value.

 

Death benefits are provided in lieu of these retirement payments if the participant dies while in the employ of the Bank before age 65 or after leaving the Bank due to disability. The death benefits are provided by the Bank endorsing over to the executive, via a split dollar agreement, a right to payment of a portion of the death benefits due under several insurance policies purchased by the Bank on the executives. At December 31, 2021,2022, the SOSP provided for a $1,037,885$1,182,272 death benefit for Ms. Thompson.

 

If an executive dies after employment termination (other than on account of disability) but before retirement payments begin, the executive’s selected beneficiary is paid a death benefit equal to the retirement payments to which the executive would have been entitled, at the same time and in the same amounts those payments would have been paid to the executive. The following table illustrates these pension benefits.

 

Pension Benefit Table

    
  

Number of Years

of Credited Service

 

Present Value of
Accumulated

Benefit

 

Payments
During Last

Fiscal Year

Name

Plan Name

(#) ($) ($)

Thompson

Senior Officers’ Security Plan

29

 

898,952

 

 -

51

Pension Benefit Table

            
   

Number of Years

of Credited Service

  

Present Value of
Accumulated

Benefit

  

Payments
During Last

Fiscal Year

 

Name

Plan Name

 (#)  ($)  ($) 

Thompson

Senior Officers’

Security Plan

  30   748,179   - 

 

Contributory Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan

 

The Executive Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan (the “NQ Plan”) allows the executive to defer receipt of and income taxes on up to 10% of base salary and 50% of annual incentive compensation. In addition, based on those deferrals, executives are credited with any match or basic ESOP contribution that they do not receive under the Bank’s KSOP applicable to employees generally, because of plan and Internal Revenue Code limits on pay that can be taken into account in calculating the qualified plan benefits. This Bank credit to the Executive’s Plan accounts is vested in accordance with the same vesting schedule as applies in the KSOP, but all executives in the Summary Compensation Table have sufficient tenure with the Bank to be 100% vested in all contributions to the NQ Plan.

 

As amounts are credited to the NQ Plan, the value of the plan will increase or decrease based on the actual investment performance of certain investment funds selected by the Company, from which the executives can designate (and re-designate as often as they wish) how their account balances should be allocated.

 

The executives have elected between a lump sum distribution or annual installments over no more than 10 years from the NQ Plan, but that election applies only if they leave the Bank's employ due to death or after age 55. If the executive's termination of employment occurs other than on account of death and prior to age 55, benefits are automatically paid in a lump sum. The NQ Plan was amended in 2014 to give executives an opportunity to designate a different payment option on future credits to that plan than applies to previous contributions.

 

The executive also may elect (prior to the year in which credits are to be made) to have some or all of their own deferrals paid to them in a lump sum or installments over up to six years, while still employed by the Bank, provided they timely designate the amount and time for that payment, and subject to Internal Revenue Code restrictions on later accelerating the payment or delaying it. Executives may also apply to receive a distribution in the event of an unforeseeable emergency.

 

Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Table

   
   

Registrant

Aggregate

Aggregate

Aggregate

  

Executive Contributions

 Contributions

 Earnings

 Withdrawals/

 Balance

  

in Last Fiscal Year

in Last Fiscal Year

in Last Fiscal Year

Distributions

at Last Fiscal Year

Name

 

($)

($) (2)

($)

($)

End ($)

       

Hillebrand (1)

 

56,000

66,400

-

-

1,471,549

  

-

-

-

-

30,367

Poindexter

 

25,344

40,160

-

-

1,086,162

Stinnett

 

47,550

27,520

-

-

760,478

Thompson

 

31,921

35,040

-

250,365

746,209

Dishman

 

13,872

23,120

-

-

495,619

Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Table

      

Registrant

  

Aggregate

  

Aggregate

  

Aggregate

 
  

Executive Contributions

  

Contributions

  

Earnings

  

Withdrawals/

  

Balance

 
Name 

in Last Fiscal Year

($)

  

in Last Fiscal Year

($) (2)

  

in Last Fiscal Year

($)

  

Distributions

($)

  

at Last Fiscal Year

End ($)

 
                     

Hillebrand (1)

  -   -   -   -   31,466 
   91,500   89,200   -   -   1,331,501 

Poindexter

  37,608   50,000   -   -   854,458 

Stinnett

  87,475   39,600   -   -   728,551 

Thompson

  38,388   37,200   -   -   688,765 

Rehm

  22,028   29,200   -   -   66,673 

 

(1)

Includes first an employee account, then a director fee deferral account accumulated from periods when theyMr. Hillebrand received directors' fees.

(2)

This is a Bank contribution to supplement the contributions that the executive does not receive under the Banks tax-qualified KSOP because of plan limits or Internal Revenue Code limits.

 

Potential Change in Control Payments

 

The Company has no employment agreement and/or severance agreement for any named executive officer for any reason other than change in control. Various benefit plans of the Bank have special terms that apply if a change in control occurs.

 

Awards made under the terms of the 2015 Omnibus Equity Compensation Plan vest if there is both a change in control and the executive's employment ends within 24 months thereafter; and

 

Awards made under the terms of the 2015 Omnibus Equity Compensation Plan vest if there is bothIf a change in control and the executive's employment ends within 24 months thereafter; and

occurs, PSUs are paid in shares of stock as if target performance was achieved.

If a change in control occurs, PSUs are paid in shares of stock as if target performance was achieved.

52

 

Each of the executives (except Mr. Rehm) had Change in Control Severance Agreements as of the end of 2021.2022. The following summarizes those agreements.

In the event Mr. Hillebrand, Mr. Poindexter or Ms. Thompson is terminated without “cause”"cause" or resign for “good reason”"good reason" (as those terms are defined in the Change in Control Severance Agreements) during negotiations or within two years following a change in control of the Bank or Stock Yards Bancorp, the Bank will pay the executive a severance payment equal to three times the sum of their highest monthly base salary during the six months prior to termination or resignation, plus the highest annual cash bonus paid to them for the current and preceding two fiscal years before their termination or resignation. For Mr. Dishman and Mr. Stinnett, the same terms apply but the multiple of base salary and historical bonus will be two times.

 

Each executive with a Change in Control Severance Agreement also has a right to participate in the Bank's health plans at their cost for three (two in the case of Mr. Dishman and Mr. Stinnett) years following a covered severance, in addition to any existing rights under COBRA. Mr. Hillebrand, Mr. Poindexter, and Ms. Thompson are subject to an 18 month prohibition on competing with the Bank in any way within a 50 mile radius of any Bank office after a covered severance. All of the executives are required to maintain the confidentiality of all information regarding the business of the Bank and Bancorp and prohibited from soliciting customers or employees of the Bank for a period of 18 months (12 months for Mr. Dishman and Mr. Stinnett) months following the receipt of any severance payment.

 

Mr. Dishman’s and Mr. Stinnett’s agreements capagreement caps the total payment plus other payments that are triggered by or enhanced due to a change in control if the full payment would cause the Bank to forfeit a tax deduction for some of the severance payment. In that event, the severance payment is reduced to an amount no less than $1.00 below the amount which the Bank can pay without a limitation on its deduction under Section 280G of the Internal Revenue Code and which Mr. Dishman and Mr. Stinnett can receive without subjecting the executive to an excise tax. Section 280G, in general, denies a tax deduction for part of the compensation received in connection with a change in control, and imposes an excise tax on the recipient of such a payment, if the total paid exceeds three times an executive's five-year average W-2 reported income. For Mr. Hillebrand, Mr. Poindexter and Ms. Thompson, rather than capping the amount paid based on Section 280G of the Internal Revenue Code, these agreements allow each executive to be paid the described severance amount, or an amount that is just below the Section 280G threshold, if the net amount they would receive after reduction for any excise tax they might owe, would be higher than the full amount after excise taxes are paid. None of the agreements provide for the Company to gross up amounts for taxes owed.

 

Payment under each of the Change in Control Severance Agreements is made only if the executive fully releases all claims against Stock Yards Bancorp and the Bank.

 

The following table estimates the amount that would have been payable under the Change in Control Severance Agreements if their terms had been triggered as of December 31, 20212022 and other amounts that vest or accelerate if there had been a termination on that date related to a change in control.

 

Officer

 

Change in Control

Severance Agreement (1)

  

Value Realized if Unvested

Options and Stock Awards

were Vested and Exercised (2)

  

Total Potential

Value

  

Change in Control

Severance Agreement

 

Value Realized if Unvested

Options and Stock Awards

were Vested and Exercised (1)

 

Total Potential

Value

 

Hillebrand

 $3,037,372  $1,847,499  $4,884,871  $4,260,000  $1,548,029  $5,808,029 

Poindexter

  1,991,565   1,089,852   3,081,417  $2,511,000  $875,378  $3,386,378 

Stinnett

  1,077,800   824,689   1,902,489  $1,360,000  $690,485  $2,050,485 

Thompson

  1,856,400   719,043   2,575,443  $1,919,400  $622,027  $2,541,427 

Dishman

  924,800   520,598   1,445,398 

Rehm

 $0  $526,292  $526,292 

(1)

This is the total value as of December 31, 2022 of (i) PSUs that would become vested at the target award level (40% of maximum awards) as a result of change in control, (ii) the difference between the base price and the current fair market value as of December 31, 2022 on unvested SARs which would have vested had a change in control occurred as of that date and the executive terminated employment, and (iii) for Mr. Rehm only, the total value of his remaining unvested restricted stock if it was vested and issued upon a change in control and Mr. Rehms employment is terminated. The values above do not take into account the amounts executives who leave employment after age 60 with 10 or more years of service (retirement) might receive at the end of performance cycles for awards made before retirement, based on actual performance, then prorated for the portion of the performance period worked before retirement. If, for example, performance is at or above maximum, and an executive worked 2/3rds of the performance period, the total value paid would then be more than the target values listed above which are payable if a change in control occurs. Each executive also has unexercised SARs which were vested before December 31, 2022, which would remain exercisable for a period beyond termination, the potential value of which is not included in the above chart.

 

(1)These are the amounts that would be paid under these agreements assuming, in the case of Messrs. Hillebrand and Poindexter, their payments are reduced for the fact that their total severance plus the additional values from equity award vesting for purposes of Code section 280G exceed the 280G cap on what can be paid without loss of a deduction or excise taxes applying. Their severance included above is $1 below such cap, because the excise tax cost to them if the higher amount is paid is projected to be higher than the reduction in severance. However, these estimates assume no reduction in parachute payment values as determined under Code Section 280G is appropriate to account for the reasonable fair value of their restrictive covenants. If their restrictive covenants are determined to have a reasonable value that is not part of the parachute payment included for Code Section 280G purposes, they could be paid severance of up to $3,360,000 and $2,138,400, respectively.

53

(2)This is the total value as of December 31, 2021 of PSUs that would become vested at the target award level (40% of maximum awards) as a result of change in control, and the difference between the base price and the current fair market value as of December 31, 2021 on unvested SARs which would have vested had a change in control occurred as of that date and the executive terminated employment. The values above do not take into account the amounts executives who leave employment after age 60 with 10 or more years of service (retirement) might receive at the end of performance cycles for awards made before retirement, based on actual performance, then prorated for the portion of the performance period worked before retirement. If, for example, performance is at or above maximum, and an executive worked two thirds of the performance period, the total value paid would then be more than the target values listed above which are payable if a change in control occurs. Each executive also has unexercised SARs which were vested before December 31, 2021, which would remain exercisable for a period beyond termination, the potential value of which is not included in the above chart.

CEO Pay Ratio

 

As required by Section 953(b) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and related SEC rules, we are providing the following information about the relationship of the annual total compensation of our employees and the annual total compensation of James A. Hillebrand, the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer (the “CEO”) of our company:

 

For 2021,2022, our last completed fiscal year:

 

 

The median of the annual total compensation of all employees of our company (other than Mr. Hillebrand) was $60,103;$57,221; and

 

The annual total compensation of our CEO was $1,548,814.$1,962,364.

 

Based on this information, for 2021,2022, the ratio of the annual total compensation of Mr. Hillebrand, our Chief Executive Officer, to the median of the annual total compensation of all employees was 2634 to 1.

 

 

We calculated this pay ratio in a manner consistent with SEC rules based on our payroll and employment records and the methodology described below. The SEC rules for identifying the median compensated employee and calculating the pay ratio based on that employee’s annual total compensation allow companies to adopt a variety of methodologies, to apply certain exclusions, and to make reasonable estimates and assumptions that reflect their compensation practices. As such, the pay ratio reported by other companies may not be comparable to the pay ratio reported above, as other companies may have different employment and compensation practices and may utilize different methodologies, exclusions, estimates and assumptions in calculating their own pay ratios.

 

As allowed by SEC rules,

For 2022, we are using the sameidentified a new median employee for our 2021 pay ratio disclosure as we used for our 2020 pay ratio disclosure because there has been no change in our employee population or employee compensation arrangements that we believe would significantly impact the pay ratio disclosure. In reaching this determination, we considered and accounted for the effect on 2021 total employee compensation from the former employees of Kentucky Bank (approximately 190), that became our employees as of our acquisition of Kentucky Bank as of May 31, 2021. The median employee had been first identified using our employee population as of December 31, 2019,2022, based on annual compensation information from our payroll records for 2019.2022. Specifically, we collected annual base salaries and wages, bonuses, commissions, incentives and overtime paid during this 12-month period.

 

We determined the annual total compensation of our median-compensated employee by adding together all of the elements of that employee’s compensation for 20212022 in accordance with the requirements of the Summary Compensation Table appearing on page 4351 of this Proxy Statement. That calculation included, in addition to wages, overtime and incentive payments, company contributions to the Bank’s retirement plan (including ESOP) and the taxable portion of long-term disability and group term life insurance premiums for the median employee.

54

 

This information is being provided to comply with the disclosure requirements of the Dodd-Frank Act. Neither the Compensation Committee nor our management used the pay ratio measure in making compensation decisions for our CEO or any of our other employees.

 

Director CompensationPay Versus Performance Disclosure

 

TheIn accordance with rules adopted by the SEC pursuant to the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010, we provide the following table sets forth informationdisclosure regarding theexecutive compensation offor our non-employee directors for 2021. Mr. Hillebrandprincipal executive officer (“PEO”) and Ms. Thompson serve as directorsnon-PEO named executive officers (“NEOs”) and Company performance for the Company but receive no compensationfiscal years listed below. The Compensation Committee did not consider the pay versus performance disclosure below in making its pay decisions for their director service.any of the years shown.

 

Director Compensation Table

                  

Change in Pension

         
                  

Value and

         
              

Non-Equity

  

Nonqualified

         
  

Fees Earned

  

Stock

  

Option

  

Incentive Plan

  

Deferred Compensation

  

All Other

     
  

or Paid in Cash

  

Awards

  

Awards

  

Compensation

  

Earnings

  

Compensation

  

Total

 

Name

 

($)

  

($) (1)

  

($) (1)(2)

  

($)

  

($) (3)

  

($) (4)

  

($)

 
                             

Ms. Arvin

  17,100   -   8,785   -   -   -   25,885 

Mr. Bickel

  44,450   35,000   -   -   -   948   80,398 

Mr. Brown

  41,450   35,000   -   -   -   948   77,398 

Mr. Heintzman

  50,400   35,000   -   -   -   948   86,348 

Ms. Heitzman

  48,650   35,000   -   -   -   948   84,598 

Mr. Herde

  52,025   35,000   -   -   -   948   87,973 

Mr. Lechleiter

  51,725   35,000   -   -   -   948   87,673 

Mr. Priebe

  55,750   35,000   -   -   -   948   91,698 

Mr. Saunier

  21,425   -   8,785   -   -   -   30,210 

Mr. Schutte

  44,225   35,000   -   -   -   948   80,173 
         

Value of Initial

Fixed $100

Investment based

on:4

     
Year

Summary

Compensation

Table Total for

James A. Hillebrand¹
($)

 

Compensation

Actually Paid

to James A.

Hillebrand¹˒²˒³
($)

 

Average

Summary

Compensation Table Total for

Non-PEO

NEOs1
($)

 

Average

Compensation

Actually Paid

to Non-PEO

NEOs1,2,3
($)

 TSR
($)
 Peer Group TSR
($)
 Net Income
($ Millions)
 

Adjusted Diluted Earnings Per Share5

($)

 

(a)

(b)

 

(c)

 

(d)

 

(e)

 

(f)

 

(g)

 

(h)

 

(i)

 

2022

1,962,364 2,312,092 898,772 1,033,291 169.80 88.96 93.3 3.86 

2021

1,548,814 3,364,352 786,865 1,575,947 163.84 116.64 74.6 3.79 

2020

1,268,318 1,122,055 701,121 634,328 101.76 86.37 58.9 3.17 

 

(1)

In January 2021James A. Hillebrand was our PEO for each non-employee director then serving onyear presented. The individuals comprising the Board of Directors received a restricted stock award under the 2015 Omnibus Equity Compensation Plan. The number of shares granted was equal to $35,000 divided by the fair market value per share on the grant date. Based on the closing price on the grant date,non-PEO NEOs for each director received 862 shares. The restricted stock awards, together with all dividend equivalents thereon, fully vest one year from the date of grant.presented are listed below.

2020

2021

2022

Philip S. Poindexter

Philip S. Poindexter

Philip S. Poindexter

T. Clay Stinnett

T. Clay Stinnett

T. Clay Stinnett

Kathy C. Thompson

Kathy C. Thompson

Kathy C. Thompson

William M. Dishman III

William M. Dishman III

Michael V. Rehm

(2)

Represents 1,000 SARsThe amounts shown for each respective director valued using a Black Scholes valueCompensation Actually Paid have been calculated in accordance with Item 402(v) of $8.79 per right.Regulation S-K and do not reflect compensation actually earned, realized or received by the Companys NEOs. These amounts reflect the Summary Compensation Table total with certain adjustments as described in footnote 3 below.

(3)

Each director hasCompensation Actually Paid reflects the optionexclusions and inclusions of deferring some or allcertain amounts for the PEO and the non-PEO NEOs as set forth below. Equity values are calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. Amounts in the Exclusion of their fees. Investment options include Company stockStock Awards and various mutual funds. EarningsOption Awards column are the totals from the Stock Awards and Option Awards columns set forth in the Summary Compensation Table. Amounts in the Exclusion of Change in Pension Value column reflect the amounts attributable to the Change in Pension Value reported in the Summary Compensation Table. Amounts in the Inclusion of Pension Service Cost are based on the non-employee directors' nonqualified deferred compensation balances are not included above. The investment alternatives ofservice cost for services rendered during the nonqualified plan do not and have not offered above market rates of interest or preferential returns.listed year.

59

Year

 

Summary

Compensation

Table Total for

James A.

Hillebrand
($)

  

Exclusion of

Change in

Pension Value

for James A.

Hillebrand
($)

  

Exclusion of

Stock Awards

and Option

Awards for

James A.

Hillebrand
($)

  

Inclusion of

Pension Service

Cost for James

A. Hillebrand
($)

  

Inclusion of

Equity Values for James

A. Hillebrand
($)

  

Compensation Actually Paid to James A. Hillebrand
($)

 

2022

 1,962,364    (425,974)    775,702  2,312,092 

2021

 1,548,814    (335,971)    2,151,509  3,364,352 

2020

 1,268,318    (335,992)    189,729  1,122,055 

Year

 

Average Summary Compensation Table Total for Non-PEO NEOs
($)

  

Average Exclusion of Change in Pension Value for Non-PEO NEOs
($)

  

Average Exclusion of Stock Awards and Option Awards for Non-PEO NEOs
($)

  

Average Inclusion of Pension Service Cost for Non-PEO NEOs
($)

  

Average Inclusion of Equity Values for Non-PEO NEOs
($)

  

Average Compensation Actually Paid to Non-PEO NEOs
($)

 

2022

 898,772    (173,373)    307,892  1,033,291 

2021

 786,865    (144,998)    934,080  1,575,947 

2020

 701,121  25,092  (145,022)    53,137  634,328 

Ms. Thompson was the only NEO who had a pension benefit in 2020; however, the company did not incur any service cost that year related to her pension benefit.

The amounts in the Inclusion of Equity Values in the tables above are derived from the amounts set forth in the following tables:

Year

 

Year-End Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted During Year That Remained Unvested as of Last Day of Year for James A. Hillebrand
($)

  

Change in Fair Value from Last Day of Prior Year to Last Day of Year of Unvested Equity Awards for James A. Hillebrand
($)

  

Vesting-Date Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted During Year that Vested During Year for James A. Hillebrand
($)

  

Change in Fair Value from Last Day of Prior Year to Vesting Date of Unvested Equity Awards that Vested During Year for James A. Hillebrand
($)

  

Fair Value at Last Day of Prior Year of Equity Awards Forfeited During Year for James A. Hillebrand
($)

  

Value of Dividends or Other Earnings Paid on Equity Awards Not Otherwise Included for James A. Hillebrand
($)

  

Total - Inclusion of
Equity Values for James A. Hillebrand
($)

 

2022

  771,361   173,137      (168,796)        775,702 

2021

  616,247   1,321,359      213,903         2,151,509 

2020

  448,012   (134,559)     (123,724)        189,729 

60

Year

 

Average Year-End Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted During Year That Remained Unvested as of Last Day of Year for Non-PEO NEOs
($)

  

Average Change in Fair Value from Last Day of Prior Year to Last Day of Year of Unvested Equity Awards for Non-PEO NEOs
($)

  

Average Vesting-Date Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted During Year that Vested During Year for Non-PEO NEOs
($)

  

Average Change in Fair Value from Last Day of Prior Year to Vesting Date of Unvested Equity Awards that Vested During Year for Non-PEO NEOs
($)

  

Average Fair Value at Last Day of Prior Year of Equity Awards Forfeited During Year for Non-PEO NEOs
($)

  

Average Value of Dividends or Other Earnings Paid on Equity Awards Not Otherwise Included for Non-PEO NEOs
($)

  

Total - Average Inclusion of
Equity Values for Non-PEO NEOs
($)

 

2022

  313,948   77,332      (83,388)        307,892 

2021

  265,959   569,898      98,223         934,080 

2020

  193,372   (68,969)     (71,266)        53,137 

(4)

Represents dividendsThe Peer Group TSR set forth in this table utilizes the KBW NASDAQ Bank Index, which we also utilize in the stock performance graph required by Item 201(e) of Regulation S-K included in our Annual Report on 2021 restrictedForm 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2022. The comparison assumes $100 was invested for the period starting December 31, 2019, through the end of the listed year in the Company and in the KBW NASDAQ Bank Index, respectively. Historical stock awards. Dividends are held until awards vest. As such, dividends on the shares earned in 2021 were paid in January 2022.performance is not necessarily indicative of future stock performance.

(5)

We determined adjusted diluted earnings per share to be the most important financial performance measure used to link Company performance to Compensation Actually Paid to our PEO and non-PEO NEOs in 2022. This figure is adjusted for one-time acquisition costs. See Appendix A for a reconciliation of adjusted diluted earnings per share to our GAAP financial measures. This performance measure may not have been the most important financial performance measure for years 2021 and 2020 and we may determine a different financial performance measure to be the most important financial performance measure in future years.

61

Relationship Between Compensation Actually Paid and Company Total Shareholder Return (TSR)

 

The following chart sets forth the relationship between Compensation Committee, with advice and assistance from McLagan, its independent consultant, reviews Board compensation at least every two years. Their reviewActually Paid to our PEO, the average of director compensation includes surveys of benchmark institutionsCompensation Actually Paid to our non-PEO NEOs, and the related form and substance of how directors are compensated, including comparative analyses ofCompany’s cumulative TSR over the Company’s director compensation program relative to its peer group. For 2021, non-employee directors received an annual retainer of $18,000 ($9,000 for Ms. Arvin and Ms. Saunier). Stock Yards Bancorp’s directors are also directors of the Bank, and received $1,625 for each Bank board meeting attended and $1,625 for each meeting of Stock Yards Bancorp’s Board of Directors he or she attended, if the meeting was not held immediately before or after a meeting of the Board of Directors of the Bank.three most recently completed fiscal years.

 

For 2021, non-employee directors

image15.jpg

Relationship Between Compensation Actually Paid and Net Income

The following chart sets forth the relationship between Compensation Actually Paid to our PEO, the average of Stock Yards BancorpCompensation Actually Paid to our non-PEO NEOs, and our net income during the Bank who are members of the various standing committees of the Board of Directors received $1,200 per meeting of Bancorp’s Audit Committee, $1,600 per meeting of Bancorp’s Compensation Committee, $800 per meeting of Bancorp’s Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, $900 per meeting of Bancorp’s Risk Committee and $800 per meeting of the Bank’s Trust Committee.three most recently completed fiscal years.

image16.jpg

 


62

Relationship Between Compensation Actually Paid and Adjusted Diluted Earnings Per Share

The following chart sets forth the relationship between compensation Actually Paid to our PEO, the average of Compensation Actually Paid to our non-PEO NEOs, and our Adjusted Diluted Earnings Per Share during the three most recently completed fiscal years.

image17.jpg

*

Adjusted for one-time acquisition costs. This result represents a non-GAAP financial measure. See Appendix A for a reconciliation of GAAP and non-GAAP financial measures.

Relationship Between Company TSR and Peer Group TSR

The following chart compares our cumulative TSR over the three most recently completed fiscal years to that of the KBW NASDAQ Bank Index over the same period.

image18.jpg

63

Tabular List of Most Important Financial Performance Measures

The following table presents the financial performance measures that the Company considers to have been the most important in linking Compensation Actually Paid to our PEO and each of the non-PEO NEOs for 2022 to Company performance. The measures in this table are not ranked. We refer you to the section captioned “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” beginning on page 31 of this Proxy Statement for a discussion of each of these measures and how they are used in our executive compensation program.

James A. Hillebrand

Philip S. Poindexter

T. Clay Stinnett

Kathy C. Thompson

Michael V. Rehm

Adjusted Diluted Earnings Per Share

Adjusted Diluted Earnings Per Share

Adjusted Diluted Earnings Per Share

Adjusted Diluted Earnings Per Share

Adjusted Diluted Earnings Per Share

Return on Average Assets

Return on Average Assets

Return on Average Assets

Return on Average Assets

Return on Average Assets

Net New Business*

Income Before Overhead Allocation and Taxes*

Loan Growth

*

Two of Ms. Thompsons financial measures, net new business and income before overhead allocation and taxes, relate strictly to her line of business, wealth management and trust.

64

 

In addition, the Chairman of the Audit Committee received an annual retainer of $11,000, the Chairman of the Compensation Committee received an annual retainer of $7,500, the Chairman of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee received an annual retainer of $6,000, the Chairman of the Risk Committee received an annual retainer of $9,000, the Chairman of the Trust Committee received an annual retainer of $5,000 and the Lead Independent Director received an annual retainer of $7,500. Annual retainers are prorated if a director serves in a position for a portion of the year.

Directors may defer all or a portion of their fees pursuant to the Director Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan (the “Director NQ Plan”), and the amounts so deferred then increase or decrease in value based on how the director elects that the account be allocated as among various investment options provided by the Bank. The investment options are currently the same options available under the Executive NQ Plan, except that directors may also direct that their fees be invested in Company stock, which is then actually purchased and held in trust at the Bank. At December 31, 2021, approximately 93 percent of the aggregate amounts owed directors under the Director NQ Plan were invested in the Company’s stock.


REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE

 

The Audit Committee’s role includes assisting the Board of Directors in monitoring the integrity of the Company’s financial statements and related reporting process, compliance by the Company with legal and regulatory requirements, the independent auditor’s qualifications, independence and performance, performance of the Company’s internal audit function and the business practices and ethical standards of the Company. The Audit Committee operates under a written charter approved by the Board of Directors. Messrs. Herde, LechleiterBickel, Heintzman and SchutteLechleiter serve on the Committee and Messrs. Heintzman, Herde and Lechleiter serve as audit committee financial experts.

 

The Audit Committee reviews Stock Yards Bancorp’s financial reporting process on behalf of the Board of Directors. Management is responsible for the Company’s internal controls and financial reporting process. The Company’s independent auditor is responsible for performing an independent audit of the Company’s consolidated financial statements and its internal controls over financial reporting in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”) and to express its opinions on the Company’s financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (US GAAP) and the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. The Audit Committee’s responsibility is to monitor and oversee these processes. In addition, the Audit Committee is directly responsible for the appointment, compensation, retention and oversight of the independent auditor, including review of their qualifications, independence and performance.

 

The Committee discussed with management, the internal auditors and the independent auditors the quality and adequacy of Stock Yards Bancorp’s internal controls and the internal audit function’s organization, responsibilities, budget and staffing. The Committee reviewed the audit plans of both the independent and internal auditors, including audit scope and identification and evaluation of financial and related audit risks. The Committee also discussed the results of the internal audit examinations.

 

Management represented to the Audit Committee that Stock Yards Bancorp’s consolidated financial statements were prepared in accordance with US GAAP and the Audit Committee reviewed and discussed the quarterly and year end consolidated financial statements contained in filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) with management and the independent auditors. The Audit Committee discussed with the independent auditors matters required to be discussed by the applicable requirements of the PCAOB and the SEC.

 

In addition, the Audit Committee discussed with the independent auditors the auditors’ independence from Stock Yards Bancorp and its management, including the matters in the written disclosures required by the applicable requirements of the PCAOB. The Audit Committee also considered whether the independent auditors’ provision of non-audit services to Stock Yards Bancorp is compatible with the auditors’ independence.

 

In reliance on the reviews and discussions referred to above, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the audited consolidated financial statements be included in Stock Yards Bancorp’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021,2022, for filing with the SEC.

 

The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors of Stock Yards Bancorp, Inc.

 

Carl G. Herde, Chairman

Richard A. Lechleiter

John L. Schutte

Carl G. Herde, Chairman
Paul J. Bickel III
David P. Heintzman
Richard A. Lechleiter

 


65

 

INDEPENDENT AUDITOR FEES

 

The following table presents fees for professional services rendered by the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, BKD,FORVIS, LLP, for the 20212022 and 20202021 financial statement audits and audit-related services provided during 20212022 and 2020.2021.

 

 

  

2021

  

2020

 

Audit fees, excluding audit-related

 $453,500  $417,000 

Audit-related fees

  -   - 

All other fees

  -   - 

Total fees

 $453,500  $417,000 

  2022  2021 
Audit fees, excluding audit-related $565,000  $470,000 
Audit-related fees  -   - 
All other fees  -   - 
Total fees $565,000  $470,000 

 

Audit fees include fees for the consolidated audit and review of Form 10-K as well as fees for reviews of quarterly financial information filed with the SEC on Form 10-Q, FDICIA and U.S Housing and Urban Development assisted programs reporting.

 

The Audit Committee is responsible for pre-approving all auditing services and permitted non-audit services to be performed by its independent auditors. For both 20212022 and 2020,2021, the Audit Committee pre-approved the performance of unspecified audit-related services for which fees may total up to $20,000 annually. No fees were incurred under this pre-approval authority in either 20212022 or 2020.2021.

 

TRANSACTIONS WITH MANAGEMENT AND OTHERS

 

Banking Transactions with Directors, Officers and Others

 

The Bank has had, and expects to have in the future, banking transactions in the ordinary course of business with certain directors and officers of Stock Yards Bancorp and the Bank and their associates, as well as with corporations or organizations with which they are connected as directors, officers, shareholders or partners. These banking transactions are made on substantially the same terms including interest rates and collateral as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with persons not related to the Bank or Stock Yards Bancorp. In the opinion of management of Stock Yards Bancorp and the Bank, such transactions do not involve more than the normal risk of collectability or present other unfavorable features. Loans made to directors and executive officers are in compliance with federal banking regulations and are thereby exempt from insider loan prohibitions included in the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

 

At December 31, 2021,2022, loans to directors and officers of Stock Yards Bancorp and the Bank and their associates totaled $53.2$79 million equaling 7.9%10.4% of Bancorp’s consolidated stockholders’ equity.

 

Review and Approval of Related Person Transactions

 

Bancorp has written procedures for reviewing transactions between Bancorp and its directors and executive officers, their immediate family members and entities with which they have a position or relationship. These procedures are intended to determine whether any such related person transactions impair the independence of a director or present a conflict of interest on the part of a director or executive officer. Quarterly we require each of our directors and executive officers to complete a questionnaire listing any related person transactions. These are compiled by the internal audit department, and results are reported to the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors. Annually we require each director and executive officer to complete a directors’ and officers’ questionnaire that elicits information about related person transactions. Any related person transactions identified are discussed with the Audit Committee, and subsequently the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of the Board of Directors, and evaluated to determine whether any likelihood exists that the transaction could impair the director’s independence or present a conflict of interest for that director. Any such conclusion would be considered by the Board of Directors. Should it be determined a director is no longer independent, he/she would be removed from the Audit, Compensation or Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee(s) as applicable. If the transaction were to present a conflict of interest, the Board would determine the appropriate response. Upon receiving notice of any transaction on the part of an executive officer that may present a conflict of interest, the Director of Internal Audit will discuss the transaction with the Chief Executive Officer or if the transaction involves the Chief Executive Officer, the Chair of the Audit Committee, to determine whether the transaction presents a conflict of interest. In a case involving a conflict of interest, the Chief Executive Officer, or Chair of the Audit Committee, along with the director of Human Resources will determine the appropriate response.

 

5866

 

Under the oversight of the Audit Committee, management established a procedure under which any related person transaction or series of transactions in excess of $25,000, other than banking transactions in the ordinary course of business and in compliance with federal banking regulations, will be reported to and approved by the Audit Committee.

 

Transactions with Related Persons

 

In the ordinary course of business, the Bank may from time to time engage in non-banking transactions with other firms or entities whose officers, directors, partners or members are also directors or executive officers of Bancorp or members of their immediate families. In all cases, these transactions are conducted on an arms-length basis. ThereExcept as described below, there were no transactions in 20212022 with related persons involving amounts in excess of $120,000, which is the dollar threshold for disclosure under the SEC’s related person transaction rules.

In March 2022, we acquired Commonwealth Bancshares, Inc. and its wholly-owned banking subsidiary, Commonwealth Bank & Trust Company. Prior to the acquisition, Commonwealth Bank & Trust Company leased approximately 15,976 square feet of office space from Summit I Partners, Ltd., a real estate entity of which Darrell R. Wells is the majority owner. Mr. Wells is the father of our current director and nominee, Laura L. Wells. Mr. Wells, together with his spouse and his personal trust, beneficially own in excess of 5% of our outstanding Common Stock. We assumed the obligations of Commonwealth Bank under the lease with Summit I Partners following the acquisition. The aggregate amount of all lease payments due under the lease on and after January 1, 2022 until the lease expiration date of April 30, 2025, is $1,307,000.

 

As part of its annual assessment of director independence, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee considers the amount and nature of any business transactions or relationships between the Bank and any companies or organizations, including charitable organizations, with which a director may be affiliated. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee has determined that there are no such transactions or relationships that impair any director’s independence or present a conflict of interest on the part of any director.

 

CompensationCompensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

 

During 20212022, Messrs. Lechleiter, Priebe, Saunier and Schutte, all of whom are independent, non-employee directors, served on the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors. None have served as an officer of Stock Yards Bancorp nor had any relationship with Stock Yards Bancorp requiring disclosure under the Securities and Exchange Commission’sSEC’s rules regarding related persons transactions. The Compensation Committee members have no interlocking relationships requiring disclosure under the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission.SEC.

 

ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K

 

A copy of Stock Yards Bancorp, Inc.s 20212022 Annual Report on Form 10-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, without exhibits, will be provided without charge following receipt of a written or oral request directed to: T. Clay Stinnett, Executive Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer, Stock Yards Bancorp, Inc., P.O. Box 32890, Louisville, Kentucky 40232-2890, (502) 625-0890; or clay.stinnett@syb.com.clay.stinnett@syb.com. A copy of the Form 10-K may also be obtained at the companyCompanys website, www.syb.com, or the SECs website, www.sec.gov.

 


67

 

OTHER MATTERS

 

The officers and directors of Stock Yards Bancorp do not know of any matters to be presented for shareholder approval at the Annual Meeting other than those described in this Proxy Statement. If any other matters should properly come before the Annual Meeting, the Board of Directors intends that the persons named in the enclosed form of proxy, or their substitutes, will vote such proxy as recommended by the Board or, if no recommendation is given in their own discretion in the best interests of Stock Yards Bancorp.

 

 

By Order of the Board of Directors

  
 

/s/ James A. Hillebrand

  
 

James A. Hillebrand

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

Stock Yards Bancorp, Inc.

Louisville, Kentucky

March 16, 202217, 2023

 

6068

 

APPENDIX A

 

Reconciliation of GAAP and non-GAAP Financial Measures

 

Earnings per diluted share equals net income divided by weighted average diluted shares outstanding. Return on average assets equals net income divided by total average assets, annualized to reflect a full year return on average assets. Similarly, return on average equity equals net income divided by total average equity, annualized to reflect a full year return on average equity.

 

As a result of the substantial impact that one-time acquisition costs related to the Kentucky Bancshares acquisition had on results for the year ended December 31, 2021,2022, Bancorp considers adjusted diluted earnings per share, return on average assets and return on average equity ratios important as they reflect performance after removing certain merger expenses and purchase accounting adjustments.

 

 

Years Ended December 31,

          

Years Ended December 31,

        

(dollars and shares in thousands)

 

2021

  

2020

  

$ Variance

  

% Variance

  

2022

  

2021

  

$ Variance

  

% Variance

 
                 

Net income, as reported (a)

 $74,645  $58,869  $15,776   26.8% $92,972  $74,645  $18,327  24.6%

Add: One-time acquisition costs

  19,025   -   19,025   100.0% 19,500  19,025  475  2.5%

Add: Provision for credit losses on non-PCD loans

  7,397   -   7,397   100.0% 4,429  7,397  (2,968) -40.1%

Less: Tax effect of adjustments to net income

  (5,747)  -   (5,747)  -100.0%  (5,400)  (5,747)  347   -6.0%

Net income - Non-GAAP (b)

 $95,320  $58,869  $36,451   61.9%

Net income – Non-GAAP (b)

 $111,501  $95,320  $16,181   17.0%
                 

Weighted average diluted shares outstanding (c)

  25,156   22,768   2,388   10.5% 28,922  25,156  3,766  15.0%

Total average assets (d)

 $5,626,886  $4,217,593   1,409,293   33.4% $7,438,880  $5,626,886  1,811,994  32.2%

Total average equity (e)(c)

  573,261   420,119   153,142   36.5% 738,798  573,261  165,537  28.9%
                 

Earnings per share - diluted - GAAP (a/c)

 $2.97  $2.59  $0.38   14.8%

Earnings per share - diluted - Non-GAAP (b/c)

 $3.79  $2.59  $1.20   46.5%

Earnings per share – diluted – GAAP (a/c)

 $3.21  $2.97  $0.25  8.3%

Earnings per share – Diluted – Non-GAAP (b/c)

 $3.86  $3.79  $0.07  1.7%
                 

Return on average assets - GAAP (a/d)

  1.33%  1.40% $(0.00)  -5.0%

Return on average assets - Non-GAAP (b/d)

  1.69%  1.40% $0.00   21.4%

Return on average assets – GAAP (a/d)

 1.25% 1.33%  -8 bps  -5.8%

Return on average assets – Non-GAAP (b/d)

 1.50% 1.69%  -19 bps  -11.5%
                 

Return on average equity - GAAP (a/e)

  13.02%  14.01% $(0.01)  -7.1%

Return on average equity - Non-GAAP (b/e)

  16.63%  14.01% $0.03   18.7%

Return on average equity – GAAP (a/c)

 12.58% 13.02%  -44 bps  -3.4%

Return on average equity – Non-GAAP (b/c)

 15.09% 16.63%  -154 bps  -9.2%

 

A-1

 

b01.jpg

 

pic2_page1.jpg

pic1.jpg

 

b02.jpg